Prefrontal Cortical Inactivations Decrease Willingness to Expend Cognitive Effort on a Rodent Cost/Benefit Decision-Making Task.

Jay G Hosking, Paul J Cocker, Catharine A Winstanley
Author Information
  1. Jay G Hosking: Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
  2. Paul J Cocker: Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
  3. Catharine A Winstanley: Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Abstract

Personal success often necessitates expending greater effort for greater reward but, equally important, also requires judicious use of our limited cognitive resources (e.g., attention). Previous animal models have shown that the prelimbic (PL) and infralimbic (IL) regions of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) are not involved in (physical) effort-based choice, whereas human studies have demonstrated PFC contributions to (mental) effort. Here, we utilize the rat Cognitive Effort Task (rCET) to probe PFC's role in effort-based decision making. In the rCET, animals can choose either an easy trial, where the attentional demand is low but the reward (sugar) is small or a difficult trial on which both the attentional demand and reward are greater. Temporary inactivation of PL and IL decreased all animals' willingness to expend mental effort and increased animals' distractibility; PL inactivations more substantially affected performance (i.e., attention), whereas IL inactivations increased motor impulsivity. These data imply that the PFC contributes to attentional resources, and when these resources are diminished, animals shift their choice (via other brain regions) accordingly. Thus, one novel therapeutic approach to deficits in effort expenditure may be to focus on the resources that such decision making requires, rather than the decision-making process per se.

Keywords

References

  1. J Neurosci. 2005 Dec 14;25(50):11628-36 [PMID: 16354921]
  2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Sep 24;110(39):15788-93 [PMID: 24019461]
  3. J Neurosci. 2012 Oct 31;32(44):15450-7 [PMID: 23115182]
  4. J Neurosci. 2001 Jul 1;21(13):4908-14 [PMID: 11425918]
  5. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013 May;38(6):1094-104 [PMID: 23303072]
  6. Science. 1989 May 26;244(4907):933-8 [PMID: 2658056]
  7. Biol Psychiatry. 2013 Jul 15;74(2):130-6 [PMID: 23394903]
  8. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2009 Sep;34(10):2329-43 [PMID: 19536111]
  9. Eur J Neurosci. 2007 Jan;25(2):559-66 [PMID: 17284198]
  10. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2014 Jun;39(7):1558-67 [PMID: 24496320]
  11. Behav Brain Res. 2011 Aug 10;221(2):430-42 [PMID: 21108972]
  12. Nat Neurosci. 2012 Sep;15(9):1281-9 [PMID: 22902719]
  13. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2002 Oct;163(3-4):362-80 [PMID: 12373437]
  14. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Apr 27;107(17):7922-6 [PMID: 20385798]
  15. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2014 Dec;14(4):1184-95 [PMID: 24668615]
  16. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2013 Jul 8;36:451-66 [PMID: 23841841]
  17. Behav Brain Res. 2013 Aug 1;250:91-101 [PMID: 23664821]
  18. J Neurosci. 2006 Dec 20;26(51):13264-72 [PMID: 17182776]
  19. J Neurosci. 2003 Jul 23;23(16):6475-9 [PMID: 12878688]
  20. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012 Jul;37(8):1825-37 [PMID: 22453140]
  21. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2003 May;167(3):304-14 [PMID: 12677356]
  22. J Abnorm Psychol. 2014 May;123(2):387-97 [PMID: 24886012]
  23. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2011 May;29(3):215-23 [PMID: 21345366]
  24. Neurotox Res. 2008 Oct;14(2-3):249-62 [PMID: 19073430]
  25. J Neurosci. 2004 Feb 4;24(5):1129-35 [PMID: 14762131]
  26. PLoS Biol. 2012 Feb;10(2):e1001266 [PMID: 22363208]
  27. Science. 2014 May 23;344(6186):862-7 [PMID: 24855262]
  28. Scand J Psychol. 2014 Jun;55(3):233-43 [PMID: 24602177]
  29. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e72626 [PMID: 24013455]
  30. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e57575 [PMID: 23460877]
  31. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2010 Nov;139(4):665-82 [PMID: 20853993]
  32. PLoS One. 2014;9(10):e111580 [PMID: 25353339]
  33. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2011 Apr;6(2):252-6 [PMID: 20855294]
  34. Brain Cogn. 1996 Mar;30(2):155-74 [PMID: 8811992]
  35. Neural Netw. 2006 Oct;19(8):1302-14 [PMID: 16949252]
  36. Science. 2007 Mar 30;315(5820):1860-2 [PMID: 17395832]
  37. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2007 Apr;191(3):521-50 [PMID: 16983543]
  38. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2000 Aug;25(6):535-49 [PMID: 10840167]
  39. Neurosci Res. 2004 Sep;50(1):1-11 [PMID: 15288493]
  40. Cereb Cortex. 1996 May-Jun;6(3):470-81 [PMID: 8670672]
  41. J Neurosci. 2006 Mar 1;26(9):2449-57 [PMID: 16510723]
  42. J Neurosci. 2013 Oct 23;33(43):16865-73 [PMID: 24155293]
  43. J Pediatr. 2013 Jan;162(1):90-3 [PMID: 22906511]
  44. Schizophr Bull. 2011 Mar;37(2):416-25 [PMID: 19713300]
  45. Behav Brain Res. 2003 Nov 30;146(1-2):3-17 [PMID: 14643455]
  46. Biochem Pharmacol. 2007 Oct 15;74(8):1212-23 [PMID: 17689498]
  47. Nat Rev Neurol. 2010 Nov;6(11):611-23 [PMID: 21045795]
  48. Neuroscience. 1999;94(1):47-57 [PMID: 10613496]
  49. Learn Mem. 2005 May-Jun;12(3):334-42 [PMID: 15930509]
  50. Psychol Rev. 2013 Apr;120(2):395-410 [PMID: 23458085]
  51. J Neurosci. 2009 Mar 11;29(10):3148-59 [PMID: 19279252]
  52. Nat Neurosci. 2006 Sep;9(9):1161-8 [PMID: 16921368]
  53. Cereb Cortex. 2002 Dec;12(12):1254-68 [PMID: 12427677]
  54. Neuroscience. 1998 Mar;83(1):63-79 [PMID: 9466399]
  55. J Neurosci. 2002 Dec 15;22(24):10996-1003 [PMID: 12486195]
  56. Science. 1981 Jan 30;211(4481):453-8 [PMID: 7455683]
  57. J Alzheimers Dis. 2014;40(3):737-42 [PMID: 24577458]
  58. J Abnorm Psychol. 2012 Aug;121(3):553-8 [PMID: 22775583]
  59. Eur J Neurosci. 2000 Aug;12(8):3051-8 [PMID: 10971646]
  60. Behav Neurosci. 1995 Dec;109(6):1063-73 [PMID: 8748957]
  61. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2014 Jan;23 Suppl 1:41-57 [PMID: 24375535]
  62. Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Dec;36(6):661-79 [PMID: 24304775]
  63. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2015 Mar;40(4):1005-15 [PMID: 25328051]
  64. J Affect Disord. 2005 Dec;89(1-3):125-35 [PMID: 16324752]
  65. Front Psychol. 2014 May 15;5:435 [PMID: 24860542]
  66. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2009 Mar;9(1):16-27 [PMID: 19246324]
  67. Q J Exp Psychol B. 1998 Aug;51(3):219-33 [PMID: 9786783]
  68. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011 Dec;1239:118-29 [PMID: 22145881]
  69. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012 Sep;37(10):2194-209 [PMID: 22569506]
  70. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2008 Dec;8(4):375-89 [PMID: 19033236]
  71. J Neurosci. 2010 Jul 21;30(29):9708-14 [PMID: 20660253]
  72. J Neurosci. 2012 May 2;32(18):6170-6 [PMID: 22553023]
  73. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2004 Dec;14(6):769-76 [PMID: 15582382]
  74. Brain Cogn. 2004 Nov;56(2):129-40 [PMID: 15518930]
  75. Behav Brain Res. 2015 Feb 15;279:259-73 [PMID: 25446745]
  76. Behav Brain Res. 2003 Nov 30;146(1-2):105-19 [PMID: 14643464]
  77. Neuron. 2012 Jun 7;74(5):947-60 [PMID: 22681697]
  78. Trends Neurosci. 2007 May;30(5):220-7 [PMID: 17400299]
  79. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2015 Mar;15(1):145-54 [PMID: 24957405]
  80. Yale J Biol Med. 1955 Dec-1956 Feb;28(3-4):331-41 [PMID: 13291858]
  81. J Neurosci. 2009 Apr 8;29(14):4531-41 [PMID: 19357278]
  82. Behav Brain Res. 2010 Jul 11;210(2):263-72 [PMID: 20206211]

Grants

  1. /Canadian Institutes of Health Research

MeSH Term

Animals
Attention
Behavior, Animal
Cognition
Decision Making
Male
Prefrontal Cortex
Rats
Rats, Long-Evans
Reward

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0effortresourcesgreaterrewardPLILcortexPFCmentalattentionalrequireseattentionanimalprelimbicinfralimbicregionseffort-basedchoicewhereasCognitiveEffortTaskrCETdecisionmakinganimalstrialdemandanimals'increasedinactivationsPersonalsuccessoftennecessitatesexpendingequallyimportantalsojudicioususelimitedcognitivegPreviousmodelsshownprefrontalinvolvedphysicalhumanstudiesdemonstratedcontributionsutilizeratprobePFC'srolecanchooseeithereasylowsugarsmalldifficultTemporaryinactivationdecreasedwillingnessexpenddistractibilitysubstantiallyaffectedperformanceimotorimpulsivitydataimplycontributesdiminishedshiftviabrainaccordinglyThusonenoveltherapeuticapproachdeficitsexpendituremayfocusratherdecision-makingprocesspersePrefrontalCorticalInactivationsDecreaseWillingnessExpendRodentCost/BenefitDecision-Makingmodelcortico-limbic-striatalcircuits

Similar Articles

Cited By