Dissociations between developmental dyslexias and attention deficits.

Limor Lukov, Naama Friedmann, Lilach Shalev, Lilach Khentov-Kraus, Nir Shalev, Rakefet Lorber, Revital Guggenheim
Author Information
  1. Limor Lukov: School of Education and Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv, Israel.
  2. Naama Friedmann: School of Education and Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv, Israel.
  3. Lilach Shalev: School of Education and Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv, Israel.
  4. Lilach Khentov-Kraus: School of Education and Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv, Israel.
  5. Nir Shalev: School of Education and Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv, Israel.
  6. Rakefet Lorber: School of Education and Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv, Israel.
  7. Revital Guggenheim: School of Education and Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv, Israel.

Abstract

We examine whether attention deficits underlie developmental dyslexia, or certain types of dyslexia, by presenting double dissociations between the two. We took into account the existence of distinct types of dyslexia and of attention deficits, and focused on dyslexias that may be thought to have an attentional basis: letter position dyslexia (LPD), in which letters migrate within words, attentional dyslexia (AD), in which letters migrate between words, neglect dyslexia, in which letters on one side of the word are omitted or substituted, and surface dyslexia, in which words are read via the sublexical route. We tested 110 children and adults with developmental dyslexia and/or attention deficits, using extensive batteries of reading and attention. For each participant, the existence of dyslexia and the dyslexia type were tested using reading tests that included stimuli sensitive to the various dyslexia types. Attention deficit and its type was established through attention tasks assessing sustained, selective, orienting, and executive attention functioning. Using this procedure, we identified 55 participants who showed a double dissociation between reading and attention: 28 had dyslexia with normal attention and 27 had attention deficits with normal reading. Importantly, each dyslexia with suspected attentional basis dissociated from attention: we found 21 individuals with LPD, 13 AD, 2 neglect dyslexia, and 12 surface dyslexia without attention deficits. Other dyslexia types (vowel dyslexia, phonological dyslexia, visual dyslexia) also dissociated from attention deficits. Examination of 55 additional individuals with both a specific dyslexia and a certain attention deficit found no attention function that was consistently linked with any dyslexia type. Specifically, LPD and AD dissociated from selective attention, neglect dyslexia dissociated from orienting, and surface dyslexia dissociated from sustained and executive attention. These results indicate that visuospatial attention deficits do not underlie these dyslexias.

Keywords

References

  1. Brain Lang. 1999 Mar;67(1):1-29 [PMID: 10190998]
  2. Vision Res. 1999 Feb;39(3):585-602 [PMID: 10341987]
  3. Neuroreport. 1999 Apr 26;10(6):1283-7 [PMID: 10363940]
  4. Cortex. 1999 Dec;35(5):661-74 [PMID: 10656634]
  5. Cortex. 2000 Feb;36(1):109-23 [PMID: 10728901]
  6. Brain Lang. 2001 Jan;76(1):18-34 [PMID: 11161352]
  7. Psychol Rev. 2001 Jan;108(1):204-56 [PMID: 11212628]
  8. Q J Exp Psychol A. 2001 May;54(2):439-67 [PMID: 11394056]
  9. Neuropsychologia. 2002;40(8):1506-15 [PMID: 11931955]
  10. Trends Cogn Sci. 2002 Sep 1;6(9):359 [PMID: 12200168]
  11. Neuropsychologia. 2003;41(8):877-85 [PMID: 12667524]
  12. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003 Apr;16(2):185-91 [PMID: 12668226]
  13. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1962 Nov;25:339-44 [PMID: 14032919]
  14. Brain Cogn. 2003 Nov;53(2):181-4 [PMID: 14607143]
  15. Cortex. 2004 Apr;40(2):301-13 [PMID: 15156788]
  16. J Learn Disabil. 2000 Mar-Apr;33(2):179-91 [PMID: 15505947]
  17. Dyslexia. 2004 Nov;10(4):339-63 [PMID: 15573964]
  18. J Learn Disabil. 2005 Mar-Apr;38(2):142-57 [PMID: 15813596]
  19. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1992 May;31(3):439-48 [PMID: 1592775]
  20. Behav Neurol. 2005;16(2-3):145-58 [PMID: 16410630]
  21. Cognition. 2007 Aug;104(2):198-230 [PMID: 16859667]
  22. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Dec;32(6):1303-23 [PMID: 17154774]
  23. Cortex. 2008 Oct;44(9):1146-60 [PMID: 18761129]
  24. Dev Psychopathol. 2008 Fall;20(4):1329-49 [PMID: 18838044]
  25. J Neuropsychol. 2007 Sep;1(Pt 2):201-36 [PMID: 19331018]
  26. Cortex. 2010 Sep;46(8):982-1004 [PMID: 19853849]
  27. Neuropsychologia. 2010 Jun;48(7):1935-47 [PMID: 20298704]
  28. Brain Cogn. 1991 Mar;15(2):139-59 [PMID: 2043361]
  29. Exp Brain Res. 2010 Oct;206(2):219-35 [PMID: 20714712]
  30. Cortex. 2010 Nov-Dec;46(10):1216-37 [PMID: 20832785]
  31. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2001 Sep;18(6):551-76 [PMID: 20945228]
  32. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2001 Sep;18(7):577-615 [PMID: 20945229]
  33. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2001 Dec 1;18(8):673-96 [PMID: 20945233]
  34. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2002 Jul 1;19(5):421-44 [PMID: 20957547]
  35. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2006 Sep;23(6):795-821 [PMID: 21049354]
  36. Neuropsychologia. 2011 Jul;49(9):2584-91 [PMID: 21609725]
  37. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1990;13:25-42 [PMID: 2183676]
  38. J Neuropsychol. 2012 Mar;6(1):1-30 [PMID: 22257495]
  39. Cortex. 1990 Sep;26(3):343-59 [PMID: 2249436]
  40. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2012;35:73-89 [PMID: 22524787]
  41. Behav Neurol. 2012;25(3):193-203 [PMID: 22713385]
  42. Neuropsychologia. 2012 Dec;50(14):3681-92 [PMID: 22820637]
  43. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(2):245-60 [PMID: 22928494]
  44. Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Jan;34(1):431-9 [PMID: 23023301]
  45. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1990 Feb;18(1):29-45 [PMID: 2324400]
  46. Neuropsychologia. 2013 Sep;51(11):2109-19 [PMID: 23850599]
  47. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Jun 03;8:356 [PMID: 24917802]
  48. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Oct 15;9:497 [PMID: 26528159]
  49. Cogn Neuropsychol. 1996 Jan 1;13(1):25-50 [PMID: 28532313]
  50. Neuropsychologia. 1986;24(6):759-67 [PMID: 3100983]
  51. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1987 Sep;50(9):1110-6 [PMID: 3668560]
  52. J Psycholinguist Res. 1973 Jul;2(3):175-99 [PMID: 4795473]
  53. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1983 Aug;35(Pt 3):469-95 [PMID: 6571320]
  54. Br J Psychol. 1983 Nov;74 (Pt 4):517-33 [PMID: 6640236]
  55. J Exp Psychol. 1980 Jun;109(2):160-74 [PMID: 7381367]
  56. Percept Psychophys. 1995 Aug;57(6):787-95 [PMID: 7651803]
  57. Cortex. 1993 Dec;29(4):601-15 [PMID: 8124937]
  58. Neuropsychologia. 1993 Sep;31(9):871-85 [PMID: 8232846]
  59. Neuropsychologia. 1977;15(1):31-41 [PMID: 831151]
  60. Cognition. 1993 May;47(2):149-80 [PMID: 8324999]
  61. Brain Lang. 1996 Jan;52(1):114-28 [PMID: 8741978]
  62. Percept Mot Skills. 1996 Jun;82(3 Pt 2):1155-67 [PMID: 8823883]
  63. Cortex. 1998 Sep;34(4):531-46 [PMID: 9800088]
  64. J Exp Child Psychol. 1999 Feb;72(2):73-94 [PMID: 9927524]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0dyslexiaattentiondeficitsdissociateddevelopmentaltypesattentionalneglectsurfacereadingdyslexiasLPDletterswordsADtypeunderliecertaindoubleexistenceletterpositionmigratetestedusingdeficitsustainedselectiveorientingexecutive55dissociationattention:normalfoundindividualsexaminewhetherpresentingdissociationstwotookaccountdistinctfocusedmaythoughtbasis:withinonesidewordomittedsubstitutedreadviasublexicalroute110childrenadultsand/orextensivebatteriesparticipanttestsincludedstimulisensitivevariousAttentionestablishedtasksassessingfunctioningUsingprocedureidentifiedparticipantsshowed2827Importantlysuspectedbasis2113212withoutvowelphonologicalvisualalsoExaminationadditionalspecificfunctionconsistentlylinkedSpecificallyresultsindicatevisuospatialDissociations

Similar Articles

Cited By