Working memory training improves visual short-term memory capacity.

Hillary Schwarb, Jayde Nail, Eric H Schumacher
Author Information
  1. Hillary Schwarb: Beckman Institute, University of Illinois, 405 North Mathews Avenue, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA. schwarb2@illinois.edu.
  2. Jayde Nail: School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, 654 Cherry Street, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA.
  3. Eric H Schumacher: School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, 654 Cherry Street, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA.

Abstract

Since antiquity, philosophers, theologians, and scientists have been interested in human memory. However, researchers today are still working to understand the capabilities, boundaries, and architecture. While the storage capabilities of long-term memory are seemingly unlimited (Bahrick, J Exp Psychol 113:1-2, 1984), working memory, or the ability to maintain and manipulate information held in memory, seems to have stringent capacity limits (e.g., Cowan, Behav Brain Sci 24:87-185, 2001). Individual differences, however, do exist and these differences can often predict performance on a wide variety of tasks (cf. Engle What is working-memory capacity? 297-314, 2001). Recently, researchers have promoted the enticing possibility that simple behavioral training can expand the limits of working memory which indeed may also lead to improvements on other cognitive processes as well (cf. Morrison and Chein, Psychol Bull Rev 18:46-60 2011). However, initial investigations across a wide variety of cognitive functions have produced mixed results regarding the transferability of training-related improvements. Across two experiments, the present research focuses on the benefit of working memory training on visual short-term memory capacity-a cognitive process that has received little attention in the training literature. Data reveal training-related improvement of global measures of visual short-term memory as well as of measures of the independent sub-processes that contribute to capacity (Awh et al., Psychol Sci 18(7):622-628, 2007). These results suggest that the ability to inhibit irrelevant information within and between trials is enhanced via n-back training allowing for selective improvement on untrained tasks. Additionally, we highlight a potential limitation of the standard adaptive training procedure and propose a modified design to ensure variability in the training environment.

References

  1. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Mar 27;6:63 [PMID: 22470330]
  2. Psychophysiology. 2013 Mar;50(3):297-307 [PMID: 23350956]
  3. Nature. 2008 May 8;453(7192):233-5 [PMID: 18385672]
  4. Psychol Sci. 2011 Nov;22(11):1434-41 [PMID: 21987693]
  5. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Nov;30(6):1322-37 [PMID: 15521807]
  6. J Cogn Neurosci. 1997 Jul;9(4):462-75 [PMID: 23968211]
  7. Nature. 2005 Nov 24;438(7067):500-3 [PMID: 16306992]
  8. Psychol Sci. 2007 Jul;18(7):614-21 [PMID: 17614870]
  9. Br Med J. 1947 Jun 21;1(4511):877-80 [PMID: 20248127]
  10. Brain Res. 2012 Jul 23;1466:44-55 [PMID: 22659025]
  11. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Nov;30(6):1302-21 [PMID: 15521806]
  12. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e50431 [PMID: 23209740]
  13. Behav Brain Sci. 2001 Feb;24(1):87-114; discussion 114-85 [PMID: 11515286]
  14. Psychol Bull. 2002 Jul;128(4):612-37 [PMID: 12081085]
  15. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Feb 15;2 Suppl 1:S167-79 [PMID: 22682905]
  16. J Neurosci. 2009 Jul 8;29(27):8726-33 [PMID: 19587279]
  17. Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Apr;14(2):187-93 [PMID: 17694899]
  18. Psychol Sci. 2009 Apr;20(4):423-8 [PMID: 19320861]
  19. Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Feb;20(1):135-41 [PMID: 23184506]
  20. Dev Sci. 2009 Jan;12(1):106-13 [PMID: 19120418]
  21. Psychol Sci. 2007 Jul;18(7):622-8 [PMID: 17614871]
  22. Percept Mot Skills. 1978 Apr;46(2):395-401 [PMID: 662537]
  23. Physiol Behav. 2007 Sep 10;92(1-2):186-92 [PMID: 17597168]
  24. PLoS One. 2013 Jun 28;8(6):e67781 [PMID: 23840775]
  25. Psychol Aging. 2008 Dec;23(4):720-30 [PMID: 19140643]
  26. J Cogn Neurosci. 2002 Jan 1;14(1):1-10 [PMID: 11798382]
  27. Nat Neurosci. 2004 Jan;7(1):75-9 [PMID: 14699419]
  28. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 May 13;105(19):6829-33 [PMID: 18443283]
  29. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jun 21;108(25):10081-6 [PMID: 21670271]
  30. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2007 May;136(2):217-40 [PMID: 17500647]
  31. Cereb Cortex. 2011 Nov;21(11):2555-64 [PMID: 21471559]
  32. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2003 Mar;132(1):47-70 [PMID: 12656297]
  33. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Jun;133(2):189-217 [PMID: 15149250]
  34. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Jun 12;6:173 [PMID: 22701418]
  35. Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Feb;15(1):215-22 [PMID: 18605506]
  36. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Dec;32(6):1465-78 [PMID: 17154785]
  37. J Neurosci. 2013 May 15;33(20):8705-15 [PMID: 23678114]
  38. Dev Psychol. 2013 Feb;49(2):270-91 [PMID: 22612437]
  39. Psychon Bull Rev. 2001 Jun;8(2):331-5 [PMID: 11495122]
  40. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 May;142(2):359-79 [PMID: 22708717]
  41. Behav Res Methods. 2005 Aug;37(3):498-505 [PMID: 16405146]
  42. Psychol Aging. 2008 Dec;23(4):731-42 [PMID: 19140644]
  43. Science. 2008 Jun 13;320(5882):1510-2 [PMID: 18556560]
  44. Psychol Sci. 2011 Mar;22(3):361-8 [PMID: 21310945]
  45. Brain Cogn. 2012 Jul;79(2):96-106 [PMID: 22475577]
  46. Memory. 2010 May;18(4):394-412 [PMID: 20408039]
  47. Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Apr;17(2):193-9 [PMID: 20382919]
  48. Front Aging Neurosci. 2010 Jul 13;2:null [PMID: 20725526]
  49. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 May;33(3):615-22 [PMID: 17470009]
  50. JAMA. 2006 Dec 20;296(23):2805-14 [PMID: 17179457]
  51. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Nov;129(3):387-98 [PMID: 18929349]
  52. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1984 Mar;113(1):1-29 [PMID: 6242406]
  53. Neuropsychologia. 2012 Aug;50(10):2379-88 [PMID: 22722069]
  54. Nature. 2003 May 29;423(6939):534-7 [PMID: 12774121]
  55. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2005 Jul;76(7 Suppl):C24-30 [PMID: 16018326]
  56. Nature. 2010 Jun 10;465(7299):775-8 [PMID: 20407435]
  57. Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Oct;17(5):673-9 [PMID: 21037165]
  58. Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Feb;18(1):46-60 [PMID: 21327348]
  59. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 May;27(3):817-35 [PMID: 11394682]

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Attention
Cognition
Female
Humans
Learning
Male
Memory, Short-Term
Photic Stimulation
Task Performance and Analysis
Transfer, Psychology
Visual Perception
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0memorytrainingworkingPsycholcapacitycognitivevisualshort-termHoweverresearcherscapabilitiesabilityinformationlimitsSci2001differencescanwidevarietytaskscfimprovementswellresultstraining-relatedimprovementmeasuresSinceantiquityphilosopherstheologiansscientistsinterestedhumantodaystillunderstandboundariesarchitecturestoragelong-termseeminglyunlimitedBahrickJExp113:1-21984maintainmanipulateheldseemsstringentegCowanBehavBrain24:87-185IndividualhoweverexistoftenpredictperformanceEngleworking-memorycapacity?297-314RecentlypromotedenticingpossibilitysimplebehavioralexpandindeedmayalsoleadprocessesMorrisonCheinBullRev18:46-602011initialinvestigationsacrossfunctionsproducedmixedregardingtransferabilityAcrosstwoexperimentspresentresearchfocusesbenefitcapacity-aprocessreceivedlittleattentionliteratureDatarevealglobalindependentsub-processescontributeAwhetal187:622-6282007suggestinhibitirrelevantwithintrialsenhancedvian-backallowingselectiveuntrainedAdditionallyhighlightpotentiallimitationstandardadaptiveprocedureproposemodifieddesignensurevariabilityenvironmentWorkingimproves

Similar Articles

Cited By