Exposure of surgeons to extremely low-frequency magnetic fields during laparoscopic and robotic surgeries.

Jee Soo Park, Jai Won Chung, Nam Kyu Kim, Min Soo Cho, Chang Moo Kang, Soo Beom Choi, Deok Won Kim
Author Information
  1. Jee Soo Park: From the Department of Medical Engineering (JSP, JWC, SBC, DWK); Department of Medicine (JSP); Graduate Program in Biomedical Engineering (JWC, DWK); Brain Korea 21 PLUS Project for Medical Science (SBC); the Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery (NKK, MSC); and the Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery (CMK), Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

The development of new medical electronic devices and equipment has increased the use of electrical apparatuses in surgery. Many studies have reported the association of long-term exposure to extremely low-frequency magnetic fields (ELF-MFs) with diseases or cancer. Robotic surgery has emerged as an alternative tool to overcome the disadvantages of conventional laparoscopic surgery. However, there has been no report regarding how much ELF-MF surgeons are exposed to during laparoscopic and robotic surgeries. In this observational study, we aimed to measure and compare the ELF-MFs that surgeons are exposed to during laparoscopic and robotic surgery.The intensities of the ELF-MFs surgeons are exposed to were measured every 4 seconds for 20 cases of laparoscopic surgery and 20 cases of robotic surgery using portable ELF-MF measuring devices with logging capability.The mean ELF-MF exposures were 0.6 ± 0.1 mG for laparoscopic surgeries and 0.3 ± 0.0 mG for robotic surgeries (significantly lower with P < 0.001 by Mann-Whitney U test).Our results show that the ELF-MF exposure levels of surgeons in both robotic and conventional laparoscopic surgery were lower than 2 mG, which is the most stringent level considered safe in many studies. However, we should not overlook the effects of long-term ELF-MF exposure during many surgeries in the course of a surgeon's career.

References

  1. Bioelectromagnetics. 1998;19(2):98-106 [PMID: 9492166]
  2. Health Phys. 2010 Dec;99(6):818-36 [PMID: 21068601]
  3. Am J Epidemiol. 2002 Mar 1;155(5):446-54 [PMID: 11867356]
  4. Int J Cancer. 2001 Mar 1;91(5):728-35 [PMID: 11267988]
  5. Fertil Steril. 2009 Feb;91(2):556-9 [PMID: 18377901]
  6. Cancer Causes Control. 2006 May;17(4):553-8 [PMID: 16596310]
  7. Annu Rev Public Health. 2005;26:165-89 [PMID: 15760285]
  8. J Cell Physiol. 2008 Jan;214(1):20-6 [PMID: 17620313]
  9. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2007;43(3):208-17 [PMID: 17938450]
  10. Int Endod J. 2012 Aug;45(8):744-8 [PMID: 22429106]
  11. Am J Epidemiol. 1999 Jan 15;149(2):135-42 [PMID: 9921958]
  12. Bioelectromagnetics. 2004 Oct;25(7):481-91 [PMID: 15376248]
  13. Health Phys. 1998 Apr;74(4):494-522 [PMID: 9525427]
  14. Neuro Oncol. 1999 Jul;1(3):212-20 [PMID: 11550314]
  15. Surg Oncol. 2009 Sep;18(3):242-6 [PMID: 19560913]
  16. Am J Epidemiol. 2003 Nov 15;158(10):969-80 [PMID: 14607805]
  17. Bioelectromagnetics. 2005 Jul;26(5):412-30 [PMID: 15887256]
  18. Am J Epidemiol. 1979 Mar;109(3):273-84 [PMID: 453167]
  19. Br J Med Med Res. 2014 Apr 16;4(8):1641-1662 [PMID: 24839595]
  20. Bioelectromagnetics. 2011 Jul;32(5):378-87 [PMID: 21284008]
  21. Ann Surg. 2004 Jan;239(1):14-21 [PMID: 14685095]
  22. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 2002;80:1-395 [PMID: 12071196]
  23. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2003 Aug;12(4):301-7 [PMID: 12883383]
  24. Cancer Causes Control. 1997 Mar;8(2):167-74 [PMID: 9134240]
  25. Yonsei Med J. 2003 Feb;44(1):133-7 [PMID: 12619186]
  26. Anesthesiology. 2009 Aug;111(2):275-8 [PMID: 19568164]
  27. Rev Urol. 2005 Fall;7(4):211-4 [PMID: 16985832]
  28. Br J Cancer. 2010 Sep 28;103(7):1122-7 [PMID: 20877338]

MeSH Term

Humans
Laparoscopy
Magnetic Fields
Occupational Exposure
Robotic Surgical Procedures
Surgeons

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0surgerylaparoscopicroboticELF-MFsurgeonssurgeriesexposureELF-MFsexposeddevicesstudieslong-termextremelylow-frequencymagneticfieldsconventionalHoweverThe20cases0lowermanydevelopmentnewmedicalelectronicequipmentincreaseduseelectricalapparatusesManyreportedassociationdiseasescancerRoboticemergedalternativetoolovercomedisadvantagesreportregardingmuchobservationalstudyaimedmeasurecompareintensitiesmeasuredevery4secondsusingportablemeasuringloggingcapabilitymeanexposures6 ± 01 mG3 ± 00 mGsignificantlyP < 0001Mann-WhitneyUtestOurresultsshowlevels2 mGstringentlevelconsideredsafeoverlookeffectscoursesurgeon'scareerExposure

Similar Articles

Cited By