3-T breast diffusion-weighted MRI by echo-planar imaging with spectral spatial excitation or with additional spectral inversion recovery: an in vivo comparison of image quality.

Megan C Jacobsen, Basak E Dogan, Beatriz E Adrada, Jeri Sue Plaxco, Wei Wei, Jong Bum Son, John D Hazle, Jingfei Ma
Author Information
  1. Megan C Jacobsen: From the Departments of *Imaging Physics, †Diagnostic Radiology, and ‡Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare conventional diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with spectral spatial excitation (cDWI) and an enhanced DWI with additional adiabatic spectral inversion recovery (eDWI) for 3-T breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
METHODS: Twenty-four patients were enrolled in the study with both cDWI and eDWI. Three breast radiologists scored cDWI and eDWI images of each patient for fat-suppression quality, geometric distortion, visibility of normal structure and biopsy-proven lesions, and overall image quality. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for evaluable tissues were measured. Statistical tests were performed for qualitative and quantitative comparisons.
RESULTS: Diffusion-weighted imaging with spectral spatial excitation yielded significantly higher CNR and SNR on a lesion basis, and higher glandular CNR and SNR and muscle SNR on a patient basis. Enhanced DWI also yielded significantly higher qualitative scores in all categories. No significant difference was found in ADC values.
CONCLUSIONS: Enhanced DWI provided superior image quality and higher CNR and SNR on a lesion basis. Enhanced DWI can replace cDWI for 3-T breast DWI.

References

  1. Neoplasia. 2009 Feb;11(2):102-25 [PMID: 19186405]
  2. Jpn J Radiol. 2009 May;27(4):163-7 [PMID: 19499306]
  3. Radiology. 2001 Jul;220(1):13-30 [PMID: 11425968]
  4. NMR Biomed. 2004 Jun;17(4):170-80 [PMID: 15229930]
  5. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1985 Jul-Aug;9(4):659-75 [PMID: 2991345]
  6. Radiology. 1986 Nov;161(2):401-7 [PMID: 3763909]
  7. Radiology. 1988 Aug;168(2):497-505 [PMID: 3393671]
  8. Radiology. 1989 Mar;170(3 Pt 1):681-6 [PMID: 2916021]
  9. Radiology. 1989 Oct;173(1):265-7 [PMID: 2781018]
  10. NMR Biomed. 2010 May;23(4):399-405 [PMID: 20131313]
  11. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Oct;34(4):842-51 [PMID: 21769987]
  12. Eur Radiol. 2012 Dec;22(12):2648-53 [PMID: 22706913]
  13. Eur J Radiol. 2013 Mar;82(3):435-43 [PMID: 22658868]
  14. Eur Radiol. 2013 Jul;23(7):1791-802 [PMID: 23504036]
  15. Magn Reson Med. 1990 Aug;15(2):287-304 [PMID: 2392053]
  16. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Dec;193(6):1716-22 [PMID: 19933670]
  17. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006 Oct;24(4):735-46 [PMID: 16958057]
  18. NMR Biomed. 1997 Oct;10(7):348-52 [PMID: 9471126]
  19. Acad Radiol. 2007 Sep;14(9):1077-83 [PMID: 17707315]
  20. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Aug;26(2):375-85 [PMID: 17622966]
  21. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Jun;188(6):1622-35 [PMID: 17515386]

Grants

  1. P30 CA016672/NCI NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adult
Aged
Breast
Breast Neoplasms
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Echo-Planar Imaging
Female
Humans
Image Enhancement
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0DWIspectralSNRimagingcDWIbreastqualityCNRhigherspatialexcitationeDWI3-TimagebasisEnhanceddiffusion-weightedadditionalinversionMRIpatientratioADCqualitativeyieldedsignificantlylesionOBJECTIVE:compareconventionalenhancedadiabaticrecoverymagneticresonanceMETHODS:Twenty-fourpatientsenrolledstudyThreeradiologistsscoredimagesfat-suppressiongeometricdistortionvisibilitynormalstructurebiopsy-provenlesionsoverallSignal-to-noisecontrast-to-noiseapparentdiffusioncoefficientevaluabletissuesmeasuredStatisticaltestsperformedquantitativecomparisonsRESULTS:Diffusion-weightedglandularmusclealsoscorescategoriessignificantdifferencefoundvaluesCONCLUSIONS:providedsuperiorcanreplaceecho-planarrecovery:vivocomparison

Similar Articles

Cited By