Prevalence of and factors associated with Brucella sero-positivity in cattle in urban and peri-urban Gulu and Soroti towns of Uganda.

Denis Rwabiita Mugizi, Sofia Boqvist, George William Nasinyama, Charles Waiswa, Kokas Ikwap, Kim Rock, Elisabeth Lindahl, Ulf Magnusson, Joseph Erume
Author Information
  1. Denis Rwabiita Mugizi: College of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity, Makerere University, P. O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda.

Abstract

Brucellosis is a key zoonosis of major public health, animal welfare and economic significance, and is endemic in livestock in Uganda. A cross-sectional epidemiological study was carried out to estimate the sero-prevalence of brucellosis and identify factors associated with sero-positivity in cattle in urban and peri-urban Gulu and Soroti towns of Northern and Eastern Uganda, respectively. A total of 1007 sera and data on biologically plausible risk factors from 166 herds and their spatial locations, were collected from cattle reared in urban and peri-urban Gulu and Soroti towns of Uganda. The sera were analyzed using indirect ELISA and sero-positive reactors confirmed by competitive ELISA. Multivariable models were used to investigate for risk factors. The overall animal-level and herd-level sero-prevalence was 7.5% (76/1007, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 6.15-9.4%) and 27.1% (45/166, 95% CI: 20.9-34.3%), respectively. Herd-level sero-prevalence was significantly (P<0.001) higher in Soroti than Gulu. In Gulu town, sero-positivity increased with an increase in herd size (P=0.03) and age (P=0.002), and was higher in cattle brought in from western Uganda (P<0.0001). In Soroti town, introduction of new cattle into a herd was significantly (P=0.027) associated with herd sero-positivity. There was a geographically differential risk (clustering) of Brucella sero- positivity in herds in Soroti, while sero-positivity was homogeneously distributed in Gulu. The data highlight brucellosis occurrence and major risk factors for its transmission in cattle in urban and peri-urban areas.

References

  1. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007 Apr;13(4):527-31 [PMID: 17553265]
  2. Nature. 2004 Jul 8;430(6996):242-9 [PMID: 15241422]
  3. BMC Vet Res. 2011;7:60 [PMID: 22004574]
  4. J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Jun;44(6):1982-93 [PMID: 16757588]
  5. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1986 Sep 1;189(5):547-9 [PMID: 3759625]
  6. Land use policy. 2010 Jul;27(3):888-897 [PMID: 22210972]
  7. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2006 Apr;38(3):195-206 [PMID: 16986767]
  8. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2006 Jan 15;109(1-2):37-42 [PMID: 16112749]
  9. BMC Vet Res. 2012;8:144 [PMID: 22920578]
  10. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5(1):e944 [PMID: 21264355]
  11. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2011 Mar;43(3):603-8 [PMID: 21082245]
  12. Prev Vet Med. 2010 Apr 1;94(1-2):28-35 [PMID: 20034690]
  13. J Immunol Methods. 2003 Jul;278(1-2):171-8 [PMID: 12957405]
  14. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2000 Jun;32(3):147-54 [PMID: 10907285]
  15. JOP. 2006;7(1):62-5 [PMID: 16407621]
  16. Epidemiol Infect. 2011 Jan;139(1):157-64 [PMID: 20478082]
  17. Prev Vet Med. 2005 Mar 15;67(4):267-81 [PMID: 15748756]
  18. J Vet Med Sci. 2012 Nov;74(11):1417-22 [PMID: 22785123]
  19. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2012 Mar;44(3):557-65 [PMID: 21805229]
  20. Epidemiol Infect. 1997 Feb;118(1):35-41 [PMID: 9042033]
  21. CMAJ. 1993 May 1;148(9):1612-3 [PMID: 8477393]
  22. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2014 Feb;90(2):288-90 [PMID: 24323512]

MeSH Term

Animal Husbandry
Animals
Brucella abortus
Brucellosis, Bovine
Cattle
Cities
Cross-Sectional Studies
Prevalence
Risk Factors
Seroepidemiologic Studies
Uganda

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0cattleGuluSorotiUgandafactorssero-positivityurbanperi-urbanrisksero-prevalenceassociatedtownsherdP=0majorbrucellosisrespectivelyseradataherdsELISA95%significantlyP<0highertownBrucellaBrucellosiskeyzoonosispublichealthanimalwelfareeconomicsignificanceendemiclivestockcross-sectionalepidemiologicalstudycarriedestimateidentifyNorthernEasterntotal1007biologicallyplausible166spatiallocationscollectedrearedanalyzedusingindirectsero-positivereactorsconfirmedcompetitiveMultivariablemodelsusedinvestigateoverallanimal-levelherd-level75%76/1007ConfidenceIntervalCI:615-94%271%45/166CI:209-343%Herd-level001increasedincreasesize03age002broughtwestern0001introductionnew027geographicallydifferentialclusteringsero-positivityhomogeneouslydistributedhighlightoccurrencetransmissionareasPrevalence

Similar Articles

Cited By