Time-related grammatical use by children with SLI across languages: Beyond tense.

Laurence B Leonard
Author Information
  1. Laurence B Leonard: a Speech, Language & Hearing Sciences, Purdue University , West Lafayette , IN , USA.

Abstract

PURPOSE: For years, investigators have studied the use of tense by children with specific language impairment (SLI). This review article provides a summary of research on the use of other time-related grammatical forms by these children.
METHOD: The literature on children's use of grammatical and lexical aspect, modal verbs and temporal adverbs is reviewed. Findings from children with SLI acquiring a range of different languages are considered.
RESULT: Grammatical aspect and lexical aspect appear to be special weaknesses in children with SLI and problems with lexical aspect may also have an adverse effect on these children's ability to use past tense morphology. Although children with SLI are below age level in their use of modal verbs and temporal adverbs, the available evidence suggests that these weaknesses are no greater than these children's more general limitations with language.
CONCLUSION: The evidence thus far indicates that time-related notions further on the morphosyntactic end of the language continuum (aspect) are more problematic for these children than those time-related notions (modals, temporal adverbs) that include a pragmatic and/or semantic component. In some languages, aspect may prove to be a useful clinical marker of this disorder.

Keywords

References

  1. J Child Lang. 2011 Nov;38(5):999-1027 [PMID: 21281548]
  2. J Child Lang. 2003 Nov;30(4):769-95 [PMID: 14686084]
  3. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2001 Sep;42(6):741-8 [PMID: 11583246]
  4. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2007 Mar-Apr;42(2):209-28 [PMID: 17365094]
  5. J Child Lang. 2013 Jan;40(1):169-92 [PMID: 23217295]
  6. J Child Lang. 2011 Jun;38(3):675-99 [PMID: 21050500]
  7. J Speech Hear Res. 1996 Dec;39(6):1239-57 [PMID: 8959609]
  8. J Child Lang. 2012 Sep;39(4):835-62 [PMID: 22123500]
  9. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2000 Oct-Dec;35(4):527-41 [PMID: 11091822]
  10. J Child Lang. 2010 Mar;37(2):395-418 [PMID: 19698206]
  11. J Speech Hear Res. 1994 Feb;37(1):182-92 [PMID: 8170123]
  12. Lang Acquis. 2004;12(4):219-246 [PMID: 25995609]
  13. Brain Lang. 2001 Jun;77(3):407-18 [PMID: 11386706]
  14. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2005 Jun;48(3):621-34 [PMID: 16197277]
  15. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2009 Feb;52(1):98-117 [PMID: 18723597]
  16. Appl Psycholinguist. 2012 Apr;33(2):308-328 [PMID: 26028793]
  17. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012 Dec;55(6):1671-89 [PMID: 22653917]
  18. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2002 Jun;45(3):559-63 [PMID: 12069007]
  19. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2000 Aug;43(4):834-47 [PMID: 11386472]
  20. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2000 Aug;43(4):848-64 [PMID: 11386473]
  21. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997 Feb;40(1):62-74 [PMID: 9113859]
  22. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007 Feb;50(1):137-48 [PMID: 17344555]
  23. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014 Jun 1;57(3):952-65 [PMID: 24686724]
  24. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007 Jun;50(3):759-77 [PMID: 17538114]

Grants

  1. R01 DC000458/NIDCD NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0childrenaspectuseSLIlanguagetemporaladverbstensetime-relatedgrammaticalchildren'slexicalmodalverbsimpairmentlanguagesweaknessesmayevidencenotionsPURPOSE:yearsinvestigatorsstudiedspecificreviewarticleprovidessummaryresearchformsMETHOD:literaturereviewedFindingsacquiringrangedifferentconsideredRESULT:GrammaticalappearspecialproblemsalsoadverseeffectabilitypastmorphologyAlthoughagelevelavailablesuggestsgreatergenerallimitationsCONCLUSION:thusfarindicatesmorphosyntacticendcontinuumproblematicmodalsincludepragmaticand/orsemanticcomponentproveusefulclinicalmarkerdisorderTime-relatedacrosslanguages:BeyondSpecific

Similar Articles

Cited By (3)