Fungi isolated from Miscanthus and sugarcane: biomass conversion, fungal enzymes, and hydrolysis of plant cell wall polymers.

Prachand Shrestha, Ana B Ibáñez, Stefan Bauer, Sydney I Glassman, Timothy M Szaro, Thomas D Bruns, John W Taylor
Author Information
  1. Prachand Shrestha: Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3102 USA.
  2. Ana B Ibáñez: Energy Biosciences Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA.
  3. Stefan Bauer: Energy Biosciences Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA.
  4. Sydney I Glassman: Department of Environmental Science Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA.
  5. Timothy M Szaro: Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3102 USA.
  6. Thomas D Bruns: Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3102 USA.
  7. John W Taylor: Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3102 USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Biofuel use is one of many means of addressing global change caused by anthropogenic release of fossil fuel carbon dioxide into Earth's atmosphere. To make a meaningful reduction in fossil fuel use, bioethanol must be produced from the entire plant rather than only its starch or sugars. Enzymes produced by fungi constitute a significant percentage of the cost of bioethanol production from non-starch (i.e., lignocellulosic) components of energy crops and agricultural residues. We, and others, have reasoned that fungi that naturally deconstruct plant walls may provide the best enzymes for bioconversion of energy crops.
RESULTS: Previously, we have reported on the isolation of 106 fungi from decaying leaves of Miscanthus and sugarcane (Appl Environ Microbiol 77:5490-504, 2011). Here, we thoroughly analyze 30 of these fungi including those most often found on decaying leaves and stems of these plants, as well as four fungi chosen because they are well-studied for their plant cell wall deconstructing enzymes, for wood decay, or for genetic regulation of plant cell wall deconstruction. We extend our analysis to assess not only their ability over an 8-week period to bioconvert Miscanthus cell walls but also their ability to secrete total protein, to secrete enzymes with the activities of xylanases, exocellulases, endocellulases, and beta-glucosidases, and to remove specific parts of Miscanthus cell walls, that is, glucan, xylan, arabinan, and lignin.
CONCLUSION: This study of fungi that bioconvert energy crops is significant because 30 fungi were studied, because the fungi were isolated from decaying energy grasses, because enzyme activity and removal of plant cell wall components were recorded in addition to biomass conversion, and because the study period was 2 months. Each of these factors make our study the most thorough to date, and we discovered fungi that are significantly superior on all counts to the most widely used, industrial bioconversion fungus, Trichoderma reesei. Many of the best fungi that we found are in taxonomic groups that have not been exploited for industrial bioconversion and the cultures are available from the Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures in Utrecht, Netherlands, for all to use.

Keywords

References

  1. Braz J Microbiol. 2012 Jul;43(3):1062-71 [PMID: 24031929]
  2. Bioresour Technol. 2010 Nov;101(22):8698-705 [PMID: 20624677]
  3. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2012 May 10;50(6-7):304-10 [PMID: 22500897]
  4. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e50571 [PMID: 23227186]
  5. Bioresour Technol. 2012 Jun;114:589-96 [PMID: 22459963]
  6. Science. 2006 Jan 27;311(5760):506-8 [PMID: 16439656]
  7. Bioresour Technol. 2011 Feb;102(3):3546-50 [PMID: 20933405]
  8. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2012 Jul 28;5(1):54 [PMID: 22839529]
  9. Bioresour Technol. 2008 Nov;99(16):7623-9 [PMID: 18346891]
  10. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 Aug;77(15):5490-504 [PMID: 21685162]
  11. Bioresour Technol. 2013 Feb;130:296-305 [PMID: 23313674]
  12. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2010 Jun;13(3):305-12 [PMID: 20097119]
  13. BMC Genomics. 2012 Feb 02;13:57 [PMID: 22300648]
  14. Science. 2008 Feb 29;319(5867):1235-8 [PMID: 18258862]
  15. Nat Biotechnol. 2008 Feb;26(2):169-72 [PMID: 18259168]
  16. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2012 Apr;109(4):1083-7 [PMID: 22095526]
  17. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012 Sep;78(18):6483-90 [PMID: 22773628]
  18. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Dec 29;106(52):22157-62 [PMID: 20018766]
  19. J Biotechnol. 2007 Jun 30;130(3):219-28 [PMID: 17544537]
  20. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2011 Feb 16;4:4 [PMID: 21324176]
  21. Biochemistry. 2010 Apr 20;49(15):3305-16 [PMID: 20230050]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0fungiplantcellenzymesenergyMiscanthuswallusecropswallsbioconversiondecayingstudyBiofuelfossilfuelmakebioethanolproducedsignificantcomponentsbestleaves30foundabilityperiodbioconvertsecreteisolatedbiomassconversionindustrialFungiBACKGROUND:onemanymeansaddressingglobalchangecausedanthropogenicreleasecarbondioxideEarth'satmospheremeaningfulreductionmustentireratherstarchsugarsEnzymesconstitutepercentagecostproductionnon-starchielignocellulosicagriculturalresiduesothersreasonednaturallydeconstructmayprovideRESULTS:Previouslyreportedisolation106sugarcaneApplEnvironMicrobiol77:5490-5042011thoroughlyanalyzeincludingoftenstemsplantswellfourchosenwell-studieddeconstructingwooddecaygeneticregulationdeconstructionextendanalysisassess8-weekalsototalproteinactivitiesxylanasesexocellulasesendocellulasesbeta-glucosidasesremovespecificpartsglucanxylanarabinanligninCONCLUSION:studiedgrassesenzymeactivityremovalrecordedaddition2 monthsfactorsthoroughdatediscoveredsignificantlysuperiorcountswidelyusedfungusTrichodermareeseiManytaxonomicgroupsexploitedculturesavailableCentraalbureauvoorSchimmelculturesUtrechtNetherlandssugarcane:fungalhydrolysispolymersBioconversionCellulosehemicellulosedegradingLignocellulose

Similar Articles

Cited By