Staged immediate breast reconstruction.

Michael R Zenn
Author Information
  1. Michael R Zenn: Durham, N.C. From Duke University Medical Center.

Abstract

With the increasing popularity and acceptance of nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction comes an associated higher complication rate of nipple and skin necrosis. Historically, management of this risk has been addressed by predictive technologies or staged surgery with placement of an initial tissue expander. Certain high-risk patients, such as those with large cup size, previous surgery, or previous radiation, may not even be considered for an immediate nipple-sparing mastectomy approach due to even higher rates of complications. This report details a delay technique that allows safe preservation of the nipple-sparing mastectomy tissues, even in high-risk individuals, and facilitates straight-to-implant reconstruction without the need for tissue expansion. The aesthetic benefits, time savings, and acceptable complication profile in this series are presented.

References

  1. Wagner JL, Fearmonti R, Hunt KK, et al. Prospective evaluation of the nipple-areola complex sparing mastectomy for risk reduction and for early-stage breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:1137–1144
  2. Chu C, Carlson G. Techniques and outcomes of nipple sparing mastectomy in the surgical management of breast cancer. Curr Breast Cancer Rep. 2013;5:118–124
  3. Gerber B, Krause A, Dieterich M, Kundt G, Reimer T. The oncological safety of skin sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction: An extended follow-up study. Ann Surg. 2009;249:461–468
  4. Mallon P, Feron JG, Couturaud B, et al. The role of nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer: A comprehensive review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:969–984
  5. Salgarello M, Visconti G, Barone-Adesi L. Nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate implant reconstruction: Cosmetic outcomes and technical refinements. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:1460–1471
  6. Spear SL, Hannan CM, Willey SC, Cocilovo C. Nipple-sparing mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123:1665–1673
  7. Djohan R, Gage E, Gatherwright J, et al. Patient satisfaction following nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: An 8-year outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:818–829
  8. Endara M, Chen D, Verma K, Nahabedian MY, Spear SL. Breast reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy: A systematic review of the literature with pooled analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132:1043–1054
  9. Colwell AS, Damjanovic B, Zahedi B, Medford-Davis L, Hertl C, Austen WG Jr. Retrospective review of 331 consecutive immediate single-stage implant reconstructions with acellular dermal matrix: Indications, complications, trends, and costs. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:1170–1178
  10. Murray JD, Jones GE, Elwood ET, Whitty LA, Garcia C. Laser angiography as a predictor of mastectomy flap necrosis after breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:1017e–1018e
  11. Phillips BT, Lanier ST, Conkling N, et al. Intraoperative perfusion techniques can accurately predict mastectomy skin flap necrosis in breast reconstruction: Results of a prospective trial. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:778e–788e
  12. Spear SL, Rottman SJ, Seiboth LA, Hannan CM. Breast reconstruction using a staged nipple-sparing mastectomy following mastopexy or reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:572–581
  13. Nahabedian MY, Tsangaris TN. Breast reconstruction following subcutaneous mastectomy for cancer: A critical appraisal of the nipple-areola complex. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:1083–1090
  14. Taneda H, Sakai S. Transposition technique for correction of a malpositioned nipple-areola complex after reconstruction following a nipple-sparing mastectomy: A case report. Ann Plast Surg. 2011;67:579–582
  15. Small K, Kelly KM, Swistel A, Dent BL, Taylor EM, Talmor M. Surgical treatment of nipple malposition in nipple-sparing mastectomy device-based reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133:1053–1062
  16. Sahin I, Isik S, Alhan D, Yildiz R, Aykan A, Ozturk E. One-staged silicone implant breast reconstruction following bilateral nipple-sparing prophylactic mastectomy in patients at high-risk for breast cancer. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013;37:303–311
  17. Kronowitz SJ, Robb GL. Radiation therapy and breast reconstruction: a critical review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:395–408

MeSH Term

Breast Neoplasms
Decision Trees
Female
Humans
Mammaplasty
Mastectomy, Subcutaneous
Middle Aged
Risk Factors
Time Factors

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0nipple-sparingmastectomyimmediatereconstructionevenhighercomplicationsurgerytissuehigh-riskpreviousincreasingpopularityacceptancecomesassociatedratenippleskinnecrosisHistoricallymanagementriskaddressedpredictivetechnologiesstagedplacementinitialexpanderCertainpatientslargecupsizeradiationmayconsideredapproachdueratescomplicationsreportdetailsdelaytechniqueallowssafepreservationtissuesindividualsfacilitatesstraight-to-implantwithoutneedexpansionaestheticbenefitstimesavingsacceptableprofileseriespresentedStagedbreast

Similar Articles

Cited By