Applying a Multiple Group Causal Indicator Modeling Framework to the Reading Comprehension Skills of Third, Seventh, and Tenth Grade Students.

Elizabeth L Tighe, Richard K Wagner, Christopher Schatschneider
Author Information
  1. Elizabeth L Tighe: Florida State University.
  2. Richard K Wagner: Florida State University.
  3. Christopher Schatschneider: Florida State University.

Abstract

This study demonstrates the utility of applying a causal indicator modeling framework to investigate important predictors of reading comprehension in third, seventh, and tenth grade students. The results indicated that a 4-factor multiple indicator multiple indicator cause (MIMIC) model of reading comprehension provided adequate fit at each grade level. This model included latent predictor constructs of decoding, verbal reasoning, nonverbal reasoning, and working memory and accounted for a large portion of the reading comprehension variance (73% to 87%) across grade levels. Verbal reasoning contributed the most unique variance to reading comprehension at all grade levels. In addition, we fit a multiple group 4-factor MIMIC model to investigate the relative stability (or variability) of the predictor contributions to reading comprehension across development (i.e., grade levels). The results revealed that the contributions of verbal reasoning, nonverbal reasoning, and working memory to reading comprehension were stable across the three grade levels. Decoding was the only predictor that could not be constrained to be equal across grade levels. The contribution of decoding skills to reading comprehension was higher in third grade and then remained relatively stable between seventh and tenth grade. These findings illustrate the feasibility of using MIMIC models to explain individual differences in reading comprehension across the development of reading skills.

Keywords

References

  1. Percept Mot Skills. 1994 Aug;79(1 Pt 1):55-64 [PMID: 7991333]
  2. Psychon Bull Rev. 1996 Dec;3(4):422-33 [PMID: 24213976]
  3. J Learn Disabil. 2003 Sep-Oct;36(5):424-36 [PMID: 15497486]
  4. J Exp Child Psychol. 2010 May;106(1):20-9 [PMID: 20018296]
  5. J Learn Disabil. 2009 Nov-Dec;42(6):548-75 [PMID: 19745196]
  6. Child Neuropsychol. 2010;16(4):313-25 [PMID: 20455127]
  7. Psychol Methods. 2011 Sep;16(3):265-84 [PMID: 21767021]
  8. J Learn Disabil. 2010 Jul-Aug;43(4):332-45 [PMID: 20463282]
  9. J Learn Disabil. 2012 May-Jun;45(3):217-31 [PMID: 22539057]
  10. Read Writ. 2014 Jan;27(1):101-127 [PMID: 26346315]
  11. J Exp Child Psychol. 1999 Jun;73(2):139-58 [PMID: 10328862]
  12. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012 May;141(2):302-320 [PMID: 21875246]

Grants

  1. P50 HD052120/NICHD NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0readingcomprehensiongradereasoningacrosslevelsindicatormultipleMIMICmodelpredictordecodingverbalnonverbalworkingmemorycausalmodelinginvestigatethirdseventhtenthresults4-factorfitvariancecontributionsdevelopmentstableskillsstudydemonstratesutilityapplyingframeworkimportantpredictorsstudentsindicatedcauseprovidedadequatelevelincludedlatentconstructsaccountedlargeportion73%87%VerbalcontributeduniqueadditiongrouprelativestabilityvariabilityierevealedthreeDecodingconstrainedequalcontributionhigherremainedrelativelyfindingsillustratefeasibilityusingmodelsexplainindividualdifferencesApplyingMultipleGroupCausalIndicatorModelingFrameworkReadingComprehensionSkillsThirdSeventhTenthGradeStudents

Similar Articles

Cited By