Neural responses to the mechanical characteristics of high velocity, low amplitude spinal manipulation: Effect of specific contact site.

William R Reed, Cynthia R Long, Gregory N Kawchuk, Joel G Pickar
Author Information
  1. William R Reed: Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Davenport, IA, USA.
  2. Cynthia R Long: Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Davenport, IA, USA.
  3. Gregory N Kawchuk: University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  4. Joel G Pickar: Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Davenport, IA, USA. Electronic address: pickar_j@palmer.edu.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Systematic investigations are needed identifying how variability in the biomechanical characteristics of spinal manipulation affects physiological responses. Such knowledge may inform future clinical practice and research study design.
OBJECTIVE: To determine how contact site for high velocity, low amplitude spinal manipulation (HVLA-SM) affects sensory input to the central nervous system.
DESIGN: HVLA-SM was applied to 4 specific anatomic locations using a no-HVLA-SM control at each location randomized in an 8×8 Latin square design in an animal model.
METHODS: Neural activity from muscle spindles in the multifidus and longissimus muscles were recorded from L6 dorsal rootlets in 16 anesthetized cats. A posterior to anterior HVLA-SM was applied through the intact skin overlying the L6 spinous process, lamina, inferior articular process and L7 spinous process. HVLA-SMs were preceded and followed by simulated spinal movement applied to the L6 vertebra. Change in mean instantaneous discharge frequency (ΔMIF) was determined during the thrust and the simulated spinal movement.
RESULTS: All contact sites increased L6 muscle spindle discharge during the thrust. Contact at all L6 sites significantly increased spindle discharge more than at the L7 site when recording at L6. There were no differences between L6 contact sites. For simulated movement, the L6 contact sites but not the L7 contact site significantly decreased L6 spindle responses to a change in vertebral position but not to movement to that position.
CONCLUSIONS: This animal study showed that contact site for an HVLA-SM can have a significant effect on the magnitude of sensory input arising from muscle spindles in the back.

Keywords

References

  1. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2005 Nov-Dec;28(9):673-87 [PMID: 16326237]
  2. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2012 Oct;22(5):785-94 [PMID: 22349622]
  3. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006 Jul-Aug;29(6):419-24 [PMID: 16904487]
  4. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2013 Feb;36(2):68-77 [PMID: 23499141]
  5. Man Ther. 2013 Jun;18(3):191-8 [PMID: 23040656]
  6. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1990 Oct;13(8):448-53 [PMID: 2146356]
  7. JAMA. 1998 Nov 11;280(18):1569-75 [PMID: 9820257]
  8. Spine J. 2001 Mar-Apr;1(2):121-30 [PMID: 14588392]
  9. Man Ther. 2009 Oct;14(5):531-8 [PMID: 19027342]
  10. Spine J. 2002 Sep-Oct;2(5):357-71 [PMID: 14589467]
  11. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2013 May;36(4):203-17 [PMID: 23648055]
  12. Exp Brain Res. 2009 Aug;197(4):369-77 [PMID: 19590861]
  13. J Neurophysiol. 1976 Mar;39(2):324-30 [PMID: 130469]
  14. J Neurophysiol. 2009 Apr;101(4):1722-9 [PMID: 19164108]
  15. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Dec 1;34(25):2720-9 [PMID: 19940729]
  16. Spine J. 2007 Sep-Oct;7(5):583-95 [PMID: 17905321]
  17. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Sep 1;22(17):1955-64 [PMID: 9306523]
  18. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993 Jul;18(9):1206-12 [PMID: 8362328]
  19. Spine J. 2015 Jun 1;15(6):1332-8 [PMID: 24139864]
  20. Med Hypotheses. 2006;66(2):258-62 [PMID: 16242852]
  21. Man Ther. 2012 Jun;17(3):241-5 [PMID: 22386279]
  22. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12:170 [PMID: 21781310]
  23. J Physiol. 1969 Feb;200(3):723-43 [PMID: 4237132]
  24. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1994 Sep;17(7):431-41 [PMID: 7989876]
  25. J Neurosci Methods. 1999 Jul 15;89(2):87-96 [PMID: 10491938]
  26. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2005 May;28(4):e1-7 [PMID: 15883571]
  27. Anat Anz. 1980;148(1):55-67 [PMID: 7212283]
  28. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:492039 [PMID: 23401713]
  29. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983 Oct;(179):62-70 [PMID: 6225597]
  30. Spine J. 2005 May-Jun;5(3):277-90 [PMID: 15863084]
  31. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2013 Nov-Dec;36(9):557-63 [PMID: 24161387]
  32. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Oct 1;26(19):2105-10; discussion 2110-1 [PMID: 11698887]
  33. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2014 Jun;58(2):141-8 [PMID: 24932018]
  34. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2014 Jun;37(5):287-93 [PMID: 24928637]
  35. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2001 Mar-Apr;24(3):157-69 [PMID: 11313611]
  36. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jan 1;30(1):115-22 [PMID: 15626991]
  37. Science. 1964 Jan 31;143(3605):481-2 [PMID: 14080317]
  38. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2014 Feb;37(2):68-78 [PMID: 24387888]
  39. Ann Intern Med. 1992 Oct 1;117(7):590-8 [PMID: 1388006]
  40. J Physiol. 1961 Jul;157:370-92 [PMID: 13712062]
  41. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2001 Jan;24(1):2-11 [PMID: 11174689]
  42. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2013 Feb;36(2):78-83 [PMID: 23499142]
  43. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006 Jan;29(1):22-31 [PMID: 16396726]
  44. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2010 Oct;33(8):585-93 [PMID: 21036280]
  45. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Feb 1;38(3):E158-77 [PMID: 23169072]
  46. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1975 Mar;74(7):638-50 [PMID: 124754]
  47. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2012 Dec;22(6):814-20 [PMID: 22721784]
  48. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1993 Jul;8(4):210-4 [PMID: 23915971]
  49. Man Ther. 2012 Dec;17(6):577-83 [PMID: 22809745]

Grants

  1. U19 AAT004137/PHS HHS
  2. U19 AT004137/NCCIH NIH HHS
  3. C06 RR015433/NCRR NIH HHS
  4. C06 RR15433/NCRR NIH HHS
  5. K01 AT005935/NCCIH NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Animals
Biomechanical Phenomena
Cats
Electric Stimulation
Manipulation, Spinal
Models, Animal
Muscle Spindles
Paraspinal Muscles
Pressure
Random Allocation
Sensory Thresholds

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0L6contactspinalsiteHVLA-SMmovementsitesmanipulationresponsesappliedmusclespindlesprocessL7simulateddischargespindlecharacteristicsaffectsstudydesignhighvelocitylowamplitudesensoryinputspecificanimalNeuralspinousthrustincreasedsignificantlypositionBACKGROUND:SystematicinvestigationsneededidentifyingvariabilitybiomechanicalphysiologicalknowledgemayinformfutureclinicalpracticeresearchOBJECTIVE:determinecentralnervoussystemDESIGN:4anatomiclocationsusingno-HVLA-SMcontrollocationrandomized8×8LatinsquaremodelMETHODS:activitymultifiduslongissimusmusclesrecordeddorsalrootlets16anesthetizedcatsposterioranteriorintactskinoverlyinglaminainferiorarticularHVLA-SMsprecededfollowedvertebraChangemeaninstantaneousfrequencyΔMIFdeterminedRESULTS:ContactrecordingdifferencesdecreasedchangevertebralCONCLUSIONS:showedcansignificanteffectmagnitudearisingbackmechanicalmanipulation:EffectDoseManualtherapyMuscleSpecificitySpinal

Similar Articles

Cited By (23)