Social cognitive training in adolescents with chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: feasibility and preliminary effects of the intervention.

V Shashi, W Harrell, S Eack, C Sanders, A McConkie-Rosell, M S Keshavan, M J Bonner, K Schoch, S R Hooper
Author Information
  1. V Shashi: Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
  2. W Harrell: Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
  3. S Eack: School of Social Work and Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
  4. C Sanders: Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
  5. A McConkie-Rosell: Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
  6. M S Keshavan: Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  7. M J Bonner: Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
  8. K Schoch: Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
  9. S R Hooper: Department of Allied Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Children with chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11DS) often have deficits in social cognition and social skills that contribute to poor adaptive functioning. These deficits may be of relevance to the later occurrence of serious psychiatric illnesses such as schizophrenia. Yet, there are no evidence-based interventions to improve social cognitive functioning in children with 22q11DS.
METHODS: Using a customised social cognitive curriculum, we conducted a pilot small-group-based social cognitive training (SCT) programme in 13 adolescents with 22q11DS, relative to a control group of nine age- and gender-matched adolescents with 22q11DS.
RESULTS: We found the SCT programme to be feasible, with high rates of compliance and satisfaction on the part of the participants and their families. Our preliminary analyses indicated that the intervention group showed significant improvements in an overall social cognitive composite index.
CONCLUSIONS: SCT in a small-group format for adolescents with 22q11DS is feasible and results in gains in social cognition. A larger randomised controlled trial would permit assessment of efficacy of this promising novel intervention.

Keywords

References

  1. Psychiatr Serv. 2009 Nov;60(11):1468-76 [PMID: 19880464]
  2. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010 Jul;49(7):665-74 [PMID: 20610136]
  3. Psychiatry Res. 2010 May 15;177(1-2):211-5 [PMID: 20381171]
  4. Am J Psychiatry. 1996 Dec;153(12):1541-7 [PMID: 8942449]
  5. Biol Psychiatry. 2008 Jan 1;63(1):49-57 [PMID: 17651704]
  6. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2007 Jan 5;144B(1):27-36 [PMID: 17034021]
  7. Schizophr Res. 2010 Jul;120(1-3):210-6 [PMID: 20472402]
  8. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2000;6(2):142-7 [PMID: 10899808]
  9. J Affect Disord. 2009 Dec;119(1-3):177-80 [PMID: 19269692]
  10. Psychiatry Res. 2011 Sep 30;189(2):292-8 [PMID: 21831452]
  11. Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2008;14(1):3-10 [PMID: 18636631]
  12. Schizophr Res. 2012 Dec;142(1-3):99-107 [PMID: 23122739]
  13. Schizophr Res. 2010 May;118(1-3):118-21 [PMID: 20056393]
  14. PLoS One. 2014 Jun 05;9(6):e98827 [PMID: 24901541]
  15. Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Sep;34(9):2606-13 [PMID: 23751300]
  16. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2012 Sep;56(9):865-78 [PMID: 21883601]
  17. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2007 Sep;51(Pt 9):666-70 [PMID: 17845235]
  18. Res Soc Work Pract. 2011 Jan 27;21(1):32-42 [PMID: 23885163]
  19. J Pediatr. 1999 Feb;134(2):193-8 [PMID: 9931529]
  20. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999 Oct;56(10):940-5 [PMID: 10530637]
  21. Am J Med Genet. 1992 Jan 1;42(1):141-2 [PMID: 1308357]
  22. Appl Neuropsychol. 2006;13(4):258-68 [PMID: 17362146]
  23. J Autism Dev Disord. 2013 Dec;43(12):2866-77 [PMID: 23619953]
  24. Annu Rev Psychol. 2009;60:693-716 [PMID: 18771388]
  25. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004 Sep;61(9):866-76 [PMID: 15351765]
  26. J Med Genet. 1996 Aug;33(8):719 [PMID: 8863171]
  27. Am J Psychiatry. 2014 Jun;171(6):627-39 [PMID: 24577245]
  28. Schizophr Res. 2006 Jun;84(2-3):187-93 [PMID: 16545541]
  29. Schizophr Bull. 2007 May;33(3):688-702 [PMID: 17440198]
  30. Psychiatr Serv. 2006 Dec;57(12):1751-7 [PMID: 17158490]
  31. Genet Med. 2001 Jan-Feb;3(1):34-9 [PMID: 11339375]
  32. Asian J Psychiatr. 2011 Jun 1;4(2):119-124 [PMID: 21743818]
  33. Br J Psychiatry. 2005 Feb;186:115-20 [PMID: 15684233]
  34. Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr. 2004 May;130(2):146-62 [PMID: 15605973]
  35. J Neurodev Disord. 2011 Jun;3(2):152-61 [PMID: 21544568]
  36. Behav Genet. 2011 May;41(3):403-12 [PMID: 21573985]

Grants

  1. R01 MH078015/NIMH NIH HHS
  2. R34 MH091314/NIMH NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Child
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
DiGeorge Syndrome
Feasibility Studies
Female
Humans
Male
Pilot Projects
Social Perception
Social Skills
Treatment Outcome

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0social22q11DScognitiveadolescentsSCTinterventionchromosome22q112deletiondeficitscognitionfunctioningpsychiatrictrainingprogrammegroupfeasiblepreliminaryBACKGROUND:ChildrensyndromeoftenskillscontributepooradaptivemayrelevancelateroccurrenceseriousillnessesschizophreniaYetevidence-basedinterventionsimprovechildrenMETHODS:Usingcustomisedcurriculumconductedpilotsmall-group-based13relativecontrolnineage-gender-matchedRESULTS:foundhighratescompliancesatisfactionpartparticipantsfamiliesanalysesindicatedshowedsignificantimprovementsoverallcompositeindexCONCLUSIONS:small-groupformatresultsgainslargerrandomisedcontrolledtrialpermitassessmentefficacypromisingnovelSocialsyndrome:feasibilityeffectsbehaviouralphenotypesgeneticsintellectualdisabilitymentalhealthdisorders

Similar Articles

Cited By