Exploring some aspects associated with dentine hypersensitivity in children.

Caleb Shitsuka, Fausto Medeiros Mendes, Maria Salete Nahás Pires Corrêa, Mariana Ferreira Leite
Author Information
  1. Caleb Shitsuka: University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
  2. Fausto Medeiros Mendes: University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
  3. Maria Salete Nahás Pires Corrêa: University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
  4. Mariana Ferreira Leite: University of Cruzeiro do Sul, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The etiology of dentine hypersensitivity (DH) is still inconclusive and there are few studies concerning it in children.
AIM: To evaluate clinical, dietary, and salivary variables in children with DH complaints.
DESIGN: Forty-eight children were asked about DH. Data regarding dietary habits were collected from the children's parents and an examination was performed to determine dental erosion. Dental biofilm was estimated by oral hygiene status, according to Greene and Vermillion's Simplified Oral Hygiene Index (OHI-S). Whole saliva was collected under mechanical stimulation and evaluated salivary flow rate, initial pH, buffer capacity, and calcium and phosphate concentrations. The temperature of soft drinks, drinking method, sense of bitter taste, and other variables were also determined. Possible factors associated with DH were analyzed by univariate and multiple Poisson regression analyses. The prevalence ratio (PR) values and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated.
RESULTS: DH was associated with the presence of dental erosion (PR; 95% CI = 2.23; 1.05 to 4.71) and salivary flow rate (2.49; 1.05 to 5.91). When the presence of erosion was not included, other variables were retained as follows: bitter taste (2.36; 1.38 to 4.03), OHI-S (0.47; 0.23 to 0.97).
CONCLUSION: DH in children is associated with factors related to dental erosion.

References

  1. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008;9(3):72-80 [PMID: 18335122]
  2. Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Mar;17 Suppl 1:S3-8 [PMID: 23224064]
  3. J Clin Periodontol. 1997 Nov;24(11):808-13 [PMID: 9402502]
  4. Br Dent J. 1999 Dec 11;187(11):606-11; discussion 603 [PMID: 16163281]
  5. J Oral Rehabil. 2002 Mar;29(3):226-31 [PMID: 11896838]
  6. J Can Dent Assoc. 1990 Dec;56(12):1101-3 [PMID: 2285881]
  7. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2003 Sep;4(3):143-8 [PMID: 14529336]
  8. J Can Dent Assoc. 2004 Nov;70(10):697-702 [PMID: 15530269]
  9. J Am Dent Assoc. 1964 Jan;68:7-13 [PMID: 14076341]
  10. Braz Oral Res. 2012 May-Jun;26(3):263-8 [PMID: 22641447]
  11. Int J Dent. 2012;2012:858950 [PMID: 22792109]
  12. Caries Res. 2011;45 Suppl 1:2-12 [PMID: 21625128]
  13. Am J Dent. 2006 Dec;19(6):319-25 [PMID: 17212071]
  14. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008 May;139 Suppl:25S-34S [PMID: 18460677]
  15. J Dent. 1987 Dec;15(6):242-8 [PMID: 3480906]
  16. Int Dent J. 2005;55(4 Suppl 1):277-84 [PMID: 16167606]
  17. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18(2):651-7 [PMID: 23740320]
  18. J Oral Sci. 2009 Sep;51(3):323-32 [PMID: 19776498]
  19. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2011 Nov;21(6):451-8 [PMID: 21793955]
  20. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Sep;8(9):ZC48-51 [PMID: 25386522]
  21. Aust Dent J. 2005 Dec;50(4):228-34 [PMID: 17016887]
  22. J Clin Exp Dent. 2014 Oct 01;6(4):e339-43 [PMID: 25593653]
  23. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2010;11(3):071-7 [PMID: 20461327]
  24. J Dent. 2011 Dec;39(12):811-6 [PMID: 21911033]
  25. Dent Mater. 2012 Apr;28(4):457-64 [PMID: 22305715]
  26. Int Dent J. 2005;55(4 Suppl 1):285-90 [PMID: 16167607]
  27. Caries Res. 1994;28(6):447-54 [PMID: 7850849]
  28. Adv Dent Res. 2009;21(1):21-4 [PMID: 19717406]
  29. J Dent. 2000 May;28(4):271-6 [PMID: 10722901]
  30. Arch Oral Biol. 1994;39 Suppl:33S-38S [PMID: 7702465]
  31. Caries Res. 1967;1(4):310-7 [PMID: 5241870]

MeSH Term

Child
Child, Preschool
Cross-Sectional Studies
Dentin Sensitivity
Feeding Behavior
Female
Humans
Male
Oral Hygiene
Saliva
Tooth Erosion

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0DHchildrenerosionassociatedsalivaryvariablesdental95%210dentinehypersensitivitydietarycollectedOHI-SflowratebittertastefactorsPRCIpresence23054BACKGROUND:etiologystillinconclusivestudiesconcerningAIM:evaluateclinicalcomplaintsDESIGN:Forty-eightaskedDataregardinghabitschildren'sparentsexaminationperformeddetermineDentalbiofilmestimatedoralhygienestatusaccordingGreeneVermillion'sSimplifiedOralHygieneIndexWholesalivamechanicalstimulationevaluatedinitialpHbuffercapacitycalciumphosphateconcentrationstemperaturesoftdrinksdrinkingmethodsensealsodeterminedPossibleanalyzedunivariatemultiplePoissonregressionanalysesprevalenceratiovaluesconfidenceintervalscalculatedRESULTS:=7149591includedretainedfollows:3638034797CONCLUSION:relatedExploringaspects

Similar Articles

Cited By