Does hearing two dialects at different times help infants learn dialect-specific rules?

Kalim Gonzales, LouAnn Gerken, Rebecca L Gómez
Author Information
  1. Kalim Gonzales: National Key Research Center for Linguistics and Applied Linguistics, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510420, China. Electronic address: kalimg@gdufs.edu.cn.
  2. LouAnn Gerken: Department of Psychology, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.
  3. Rebecca L Gómez: Department of Psychology, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.

Abstract

Infants might be better at teasing apart dialects with different language rules when hearing the dialects at different times, since language learners do not always combine input heard at different times. However, no previous research has independently varied the temporal distribution of conflicting language input. Twelve-month-olds heard two artificial language streams representing different dialects-a "pure stream" whose sentences adhered to abstract grammar rules like aX bY, and a "mixed stream" wherein any a- or b-word could precede any X- or Y-word. Infants were then tested for generalization of the pure stream's rules to novel sentences. Supporting our hypothesis, infants showed generalization when the two streams' sentences alternated in minutes-long intervals without any perceptually salient change across streams (Experiment 2), but not when all sentences from these same streams were randomly interleaved (Experiment 3). Results are interpreted in light of temporal context effects in word learning.

Keywords

References

  1. Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(11):2037-78 [PMID: 16580701]
  2. Dev Sci. 2009 Jul;12(4):583-601 [PMID: 19635085]
  3. Cognition. 2008 May;107(2):479-500 [PMID: 18082676]
  4. Cognition. 2013 Jun;127(3):375-82 [PMID: 23545387]
  5. Cogn Sci. 2009 Aug;33(6):1087-1116 [PMID: 20574548]
  6. Psychol Sci. 2010 Mar;21(3):343-8 [PMID: 20424066]
  7. Psychol Sci. 2001 Jul;12(4):323-8 [PMID: 11476100]
  8. Cogn Psychol. 2009 Aug;59(1):30-66 [PMID: 19324332]
  9. J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Jan;105(1):512-21 [PMID: 9921674]
  10. Front Psychol. 2011 Nov 25;2:324 [PMID: 22131981]
  11. Cognition. 2010 Nov;117(2):107-25 [PMID: 20832060]
  12. Psychol Rev. 2013 Oct;120(4):751-78 [PMID: 24219848]
  13. Lang Cogn Process. 2014;29(7):771-780 [PMID: 25018577]
  14. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2003 Feb;35(1):116-24 [PMID: 12723786]
  15. Lang Learn Dev. 2009;5(1):30-49 [PMID: 24729760]
  16. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Jun;24(3):756-66 [PMID: 9627414]
  17. Cogn Psychol. 2004 Dec;49(4):370-407 [PMID: 15342259]
  18. Dev Sci. 2004 Nov;7(5):567-80 [PMID: 15603290]
  19. Cognition. 1993 Jul;48(1):71-99 [PMID: 8403835]
  20. Psychol Sci. 2008 Dec;19(12):1247-52 [PMID: 19121132]

Grants

  1. R01 HD042170/NICHD NIH HHS
  2. HD42170/NICHD NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Female
Humans
Infant
Language
Language Development
Male
Speech
Speech Perception
Verbal Learning

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0differentlanguagesentencesdialectsrulestimestwostreamsInfantshearinginputheardtemporalstream"generalizationinfantschangeExperimentlearningmightbetterteasingapartsincelearnersalwayscombineHoweverpreviousresearchindependentlyvarieddistributionconflictingTwelve-month-oldsartificialrepresentingdialects-a"purewhoseadheredabstractgrammarlikeaXbY"mixedwhereina-b-wordprecedeX-Y-wordtestedpurestream'snovelSupportinghypothesisshowedstreams'alternatedminutes-longintervalswithoutperceptuallysalientacross2randomlyinterleaved3Resultsinterpretedlightcontexteffectswordhelplearndialect-specificrules?DynamicMemorydevelopmentRule

Similar Articles

Cited By