Femoral neck osteotomy guide for total hip arthroplasty.

Lei Yang, Zhanle Zheng, Wei Chen, Juan Wang, Yingze Zhang
Author Information
  1. Lei Yang: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Key Biomechanical Laboratory of Orthopaedics of Hebei Province, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050051, China.
  2. Zhanle Zheng: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Key Biomechanical Laboratory of Orthopaedics of Hebei Province, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050051, China.
  3. Wei Chen: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Key Biomechanical Laboratory of Orthopaedics of Hebei Province, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050051, China.
  4. Juan Wang: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Key Biomechanical Laboratory of Orthopaedics of Hebei Province, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050051, China.
  5. Yingze Zhang: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Key Biomechanical Laboratory of Orthopaedics of Hebei Province, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050051, China. dryzzhang@126.com.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a common last-resort treatment for hip disease, but postoperative patients often complain of discrepancies in leg length. This study introduces a device designed to increase the precision of the femoral neck osteotomy and reduce the incidence of leg length discrepancy.
METHODS: Forty-eight patients undergoing THA were divided into two groups, with and without the use of the femoral osteotomy guide. All operations were performed through a posterolateral approach. Differences in leg length were recorded before and after the operation. Measurements were also made to compare the preoperative plan with the actual amount of bone removed.
RESULTS: The mean average difference in femoral neck resection height was 0.84 mm when using the osteotomy guide and 1.69 mm without the guide. Discrepancies in postoperative leg length were 5.45 mm and 13.37 mm in the groups with and without the guide, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The femoral neck osteotomy guide is an effectively auxiliary tool for increasing the accuracy of bone resection in arthroplasty using the posterolateral approach.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR-OOC-15005904 ; date: 2015-01-30.

Associated Data

ChiCTR | CHICTROOC15005904

References

  1. J Arthroplasty. 2004 Jun;19(4 Suppl 1):108-10 [PMID: 15190563]
  2. Lancet. 2012 Nov 17;380(9855):1768-77 [PMID: 23021846]
  3. J Arthroplasty. 1992;7 Suppl:403-9 [PMID: 1431923]
  4. J Orthop Surg Res. 2014;9:58 [PMID: 25037492]
  5. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006 Jan;14(1):38-45 [PMID: 16394166]
  6. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2013 Dec;6(4):336-41 [PMID: 23900834]
  7. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004 Sep;86(7):966-9 [PMID: 15446519]
  8. Orthopedics. 2007 Sep;30(9):764-5 [PMID: 17899929]
  9. Singapore Med J. 2011 Sep;52(9):681-4 [PMID: 21947147]
  10. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005 Feb;87(2):155-7 [PMID: 15736733]
  11. J Arthroplasty. 2005 Oct;20(7):887-91 [PMID: 16230240]

MeSH Term

Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
Female
Femur Neck
Humans
Leg Length Inequality
Male
Middle Aged
Osteotomy
Postoperative Complications
Single-Blind Method
Treatment Outcome

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0guideosteotomyleglengthfemoralneckhiparthroplastywithoutTHApostoperativepatientsgroupsposterolateralapproachboneresectionusingBACKGROUND:Totalcommonlast-resorttreatmentdiseaseoftencomplaindiscrepanciesstudyintroducesdevicedesignedincreaseprecisionreduceincidencediscrepancyMETHODS:Forty-eightundergoingdividedtwouseoperationsperformedDifferencesrecordedoperationMeasurementsalsomadecomparepreoperativeplanactualamountremovedRESULTS:meanaveragedifferenceheight084 mm169 mmDiscrepancies545 mm1337 mmrespectivelyCONCLUSION:effectivelyauxiliarytoolincreasingaccuracyTRIALREGISTRATION:ChiCTR-OOC-15005904date:2015-01-30Femoraltotal

Similar Articles

Cited By