Socialized sub-groups in a temporary stable Raven flock?

Anna Braun, Thomas Walsdorff, Orlaith N Fraser, Thomas Bugnyar
Author Information
  1. Anna Braun: University Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Konrad Lorenz Research Station, Gruenau, Austria.
  2. Thomas Walsdorff: University Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
  3. Orlaith N Fraser: University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  4. Thomas Bugnyar: University Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Konrad Lorenz Research Station, Gruenau, Austria.

Abstract

A complex social life serves as one of the main driving forces behind the evolution of higher cognitive abilities in vertebrates. In birds, however, data are primarily derived from captive animals, which strongly contrast with free-flying birds in terms of the number of interaction partners as well as available space. In captivity, Common Raven , nonbreeder groups show strong social bonds and complex tactical manoeuvring, whereas wild non-breeders are thought to resemble anonymous aggregations. Over 2 years, we observed a free-flying population of Ravens that visits a game park in the northern Alps. We here focus on the daily fission-fusion dynamics, individual spacing, and the influence of spacing on the birds' agonistic and affiliative behaviour. The composition of marked Ravens in the local population changed slowly but constantly, although often remaining stable for several weeks. Birds only flocked for feeding, mobbing and roosting, and spent the rest of the day in loose aggregations, characterised by temporary small subgroups of 2-5 individuals. Aggression was high during crowd foraging but low outside of a feeding context. Affiliative behaviours, such as sitting within reaching distance, allo-preening and social play, were observed particularly in the small subgroups. These findings suggest that Raven aggregations are not as unstructured as previously thought. Birds may spend time and/or interact affilliatively with multiple individuals during the day. This, along with temporary stability in group composition, provides the opportunity for social relationships to develop, and enables the existence of socialised subgroups within free-flying Raven aggregations.

Keywords

References

  1. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007 Apr 29;362(1480):489-505 [PMID: 17255008]
  2. Anim Cogn. 2004 Jan;7(1):37-43 [PMID: 12827547]
  3. Environ Manage. 2003 Aug;32(2):205-17 [PMID: 14753646]
  4. Biol Lett. 2010 Aug 23;6(4):472-4 [PMID: 20106860]
  5. Curr Biol. 2008 Sep 23;18(18):1415-9 [PMID: 18804375]
  6. Nature. 2004 Aug 12;430(7001):778-81 [PMID: 15306809]
  7. Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Nov;7(11):494-7 [PMID: 14585446]
  8. Anim Cogn. 2006 Oct;9(4):369-76 [PMID: 16909235]
  9. J Comp Psychol. 2007 Nov;121(4):372-9 [PMID: 18085920]
  10. Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Aug 22;272(1573):1641-6 [PMID: 16087417]
  11. Curr Biol. 2007 Aug 21;17(16):R714-23 [PMID: 17714665]
  12. Curr Biol. 2007 Jan 23;17(2):152-8 [PMID: 17240341]
  13. Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Feb 22;278(1705):634-40 [PMID: 20826480]
  14. Nature. 2001 Nov 22;414(6862):443-6 [PMID: 11719804]
  15. Curr Biol. 2007 Oct 23;17(20):R883-4 [PMID: 17956747]
  16. Z Tierpsychol. 1966 Mar;23(1):28-36 [PMID: 5995353]
  17. PLoS One. 2009;4(2):e4530 [PMID: 19240813]
  18. PLoS One. 2010 May 12;5(5):e10605 [PMID: 20485685]
  19. Anim Behav. 1998 Nov;56(5):1083-1090 [PMID: 9819322]
  20. PLoS One. 2011 Mar 25;6(3):e18118 [PMID: 21464962]
  21. Anim Behav. 2012 Jan;83(1):171-177 [PMID: 22298910]
  22. Science. 2001 Apr 20;292(5516):491-4 [PMID: 11313492]
  23. Anim Behav. 2010 Apr 1;79(4):927-933 [PMID: 25821236]

Grants

  1. Y 366/Austrian Science Fund FWF

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0Ravensocialaggregationsfree-flyingtemporarysubgroupscomplexlifebirdsthoughtobservedpopulationRavensdynamicsspacingcompositionstableBirdsfeedingdaysmallindividualswithinservesonemaindrivingforcesbehindevolutionhighercognitiveabilitiesvertebrateshoweverdataprimarilyderivedcaptiveanimalsstronglycontrasttermsnumberinteractionpartnerswellavailablespacecaptivityCommonnonbreedergroupsshowstrongbondstacticalmanoeuvringwhereaswildnon-breedersresembleanonymous2yearsvisitsgameparknorthernAlpsfocusdailyfission-fusionindividualinfluencebirds'agonisticaffiliativebehaviourmarkedlocalchangedslowlyconstantlyalthoughoftenremainingseveralweeksflockedmobbingroostingspentrestloosecharacterised2-5AggressionhighcrowdforaginglowoutsidecontextAffiliativebehaviourssittingreachingdistanceallo-preeningplayparticularlyfindingssuggestunstructuredpreviouslymayspendtimeand/orinteractaffilliativelymultiplealongstabilitygroupprovidesopportunityrelationshipsdevelopenablesexistencesocialisedSocializedsub-groupsflock?CommonComplexsocietiesCorvidsFission–fusionGroup

Similar Articles

Cited By