4th annual primary care ethics conference: ethics education and lifelong learning.

Andrew Papanikitas, John Spicer, Emma McKenzie-Edwards, David Misselbrook
Author Information
  1. Andrew Papanikitas: NIHR Academic Clinical Lecturer in General Practice, Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford, UK.
  2. John Spicer: Head of Primary Care Education and Development, Health Education South London (University of London), London, UK.
  3. Emma McKenzie-Edwards: General Practitioner and GP Educator, Bury Knowle Health Centre, Oxford, UK.
  4. David Misselbrook: Senior Lecturer in Family Medicine, RCSI Bahrain, Adliya, Kingdom of Bahrain.

Abstract

Primary care ethics is a field of study that has recently found new life, with calls to establish the relevance of ethical discussion in general practice, to gather a body of literature and to carve out an intellectual space for primary care on the academic landscape of bioethics. In this report, we reflect on the key strands of the 4th primary care ethics conference held at the Royal Society of Medicine, on a theme of ethics education and lifelong learning: first, to produce insights that have relevance for policy and practice; and second, to illustrate the idea that not only is ethics relevant in primary care, but primary care is relevant in medical ethics. Core themes included the advantages and disadvantages of prescriptive ways of doing ethics in education, ethical reflection and potential risk to professional status, the need to deal with societal change and to take on board the insights gained from empirical work, whether this is about different kinds of fatherhood, or work on the causes of moral distress in healthcare workers.

Keywords

References

  1. J Med Ethics. 1994 Dec;20(4):229-34 [PMID: 7861428]
  2. J Med Ethics. 1988 Sep;9(4):125-8 [PMID: 11650820]
  3. Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2010 Jan;(88):1-20, v [PMID: 21805819]
  4. J R Soc Med. 2011 Oct;104(10):395-400 [PMID: 21969476]
  5. London J Prim Care (Abingdon). 2011 Jul;4(1):69-71 [PMID: 25949651]
  6. BMJ. 1994 Jul 16;309(6948):184-8 [PMID: 8044100]
  7. Midwifery. 2013 Jul;29(7):723-9 [PMID: 23522667]
  8. Ulster Med J. 1987 Apr;56(1):1-12 [PMID: 3590384]
  9. Br J Gen Pract. 2010 Jul;60(576):521-3 [PMID: 20594443]
  10. Clin Med (Lond). 2010 Jun;10(3):242-4 [PMID: 20726453]
  11. Br J Gen Pract. 2009 May;59(562):e167-76 [PMID: 19401010]
  12. London J Prim Care (Abingdon). 2008;1(1):5-7 [PMID: 25949534]
  13. J R Soc Med. 2011 Mar;104(3):94-6 [PMID: 21357971]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0ethicscareprimaryeducationpracticerelevanceethicalgeneral4thlifelonginsightsrelevantworkPrimaryfieldstudyrecentlyfoundnewlifecallsestablishdiscussiongatherbodyliteraturecarveintellectualspaceacademiclandscapebioethicsreportreflectkeystrandsconferenceheldRoyalSocietyMedicinethemelearning:firstproducepolicysecondillustrateideamedicalCorethemesincludedadvantagesdisadvantagesprescriptivewaysreflectionpotentialriskprofessionalstatusneeddealsocietalchangetakeboardgainedempiricalwhetherdifferentkindsfatherhoodcausesmoraldistresshealthcareworkersannualconference:learningrolemodels

Similar Articles

Cited By (2)