Effect of hydration status and fluid availability on ad-libitum energy intake of a semi-solid breakfast.

Robert A Corney, Anja Horina, Caroline Sunderland, Lewis J James
Author Information
  1. Robert A Corney: School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Leicestershire LE11 3TU, UK.
  2. Anja Horina: School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Leicestershire LE11 3TU, UK.
  3. Caroline Sunderland: School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, NG11 8NS, UK.
  4. Lewis J James: School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Leicestershire LE11 3TU, UK. Electronic address: L.james@lboro.ac.uk.

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of hydration status and fluid availability on appetite and energy intake. Sixteen males completed four 24 h trials, visiting the laboratory overnight fasted on two consecutive days. Standardised foods were provided during the 24 h and on day two an ad-libitum semi-solid porridge breakfast was provided. Water intake during the 24 h (0 or 40 mL⋅kg(-1)) and fluid provision during the ad-libitum breakfast were manipulated so subjects were euhydrated with (EU-F) and without fluid (EU-NF) available at breakfast; and hypohydrated with (HYPO-F) and without fluid (HYPO-NF) available at breakfast. Blood samples (0 and 24 h), urine samples (0-24 h) and subjective responses (0, 24 and 24.5 h) were collected. HYPO trials decreased body mass by ~1.8%. Serum and urine osmolality increased and plasma volume decreased during HYPO trials (P <0.001). Total urine output was greater during EU than HYPO trials (P <0.001). Ad-libitum energy intake was not different between trials: 2658 (938) kJ (EU-F), 2353 (643) kJ (EU-NF), 2295 (529) kJ (HYPO-F), 2414 (954) kJ (HYPO-NF), (P = 0.131). Fluid intake was ~200 mL greater during HYPO-F than EU-F (P <0.01). There was an interaction effect for thirst (P < 0.001), but not hunger or fullness. These results demonstrate that mild hypohydration produced by inadequate fluid intake and fluid availability during eating does not influence ad-libitum energy intake of a semi-solid breakfast, at least in healthy young males.

Keywords

MeSH Term

Adult
Appetite
Breakfast
Dehydration
Drinking
Eating
Energy Intake
Fasting
Humans
Male
Osmolar Concentration
Satiation
Satiety Response
Thirst
Urination
Water-Electrolyte Balance
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0fluidintakebreakfastenergy24 htrialsad-libitumkJavailabilitysemi-solid0EU-FHYPO-FurineHYPOP <0001hydrationstatusmalestwoprovidedWaterwithoutEU-NFavailableHYPO-NFsamples24decreasedgreaterFluidstudyinvestigatedeffectsappetiteSixteencompletedfourvisitinglaboratoryovernightfastedconsecutivedaysStandardisedfoodsdayporridge40 mL⋅kg-1provisionmanipulatedsubjectseuhydratedhypohydratedBlood0-24 hsubjectiveresponses5 hcollectedbodymass~18%SerumosmolalityincreasedplasmavolumeTotaloutputEUAd-libitumdifferenttrials:2658938235364322955292414954P = 0131~200 mL01interactioneffectthirstP < 0hungerfullnessresultsdemonstratemildhypohydrationproducedinadequateeatinginfluenceleasthealthyyoungEffectAppetiteDehydrationrestrictionHungerHypohydration

Similar Articles

Cited By