District wellness policies and school-level practices in Minnesota, USA.

Nicole Larson, Cynthia Davey, Pamela Hoffman, Martha Y Kubik, Marilyn S Nanney
Author Information
  1. Nicole Larson: 1Division of Epidemiology and Community Health,School of Public Health,University of Minnesota,Suite 300,1300 South Second Street,Minneapolis,MN 55454,USA.
  2. Cynthia Davey: 2Biostatistical Design and Analysis Center,Clinical and Translational Science Institute,University of Minnesota,Minneapolis,MN,USA.
  3. Pamela Hoffman: 3Department of Family Medicine & Community Health,Program in Health Disparities Research,University of Minnesota,Minneapolis,MN,USA.
  4. Martha Y Kubik: 4School of Nursing,University of Minnesota,Minneapolis,MN,USA.
  5. Marilyn S Nanney: 3Department of Family Medicine & Community Health,Program in Health Disparities Research,University of Minnesota,Minneapolis,MN,USA.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the strength of district wellness policies with corresponding school-level practices reported by principals and teachers.
DESIGN: District-level wellness policy data were collected from school district websites and, if not available online, by requests made to district administrators in the autumn of 2013. The strength of district policies was scored using the Wellness School Assessment Tool. School-level data were drawn from the 2012 Minnesota School Health Profiles principal and teacher surveys and the National Center for Education Statistics Common Core Data. Generalized estimating equations which accounted for school-level demographics and the nesting of up to two schools within some districts were used to examine ten district policy items and fourteen school-level practices of relevance to nutrition standards, nutrition education and wellness promotion, and physical activity promotion.
SETTING: State-wide sample of 180 districts and 212 public schools in Minnesota, USA.
RESULTS: The mean number of energy-dense, nutrient-poor snack foods and beverages available for students to purchase at school was inversely related to the strength of district wellness policies regulating vending machines and school stores (P=0·01). The proportion of schools having a joint use agreement for shared use of physical activity facilities was inversely related to the strength of district policies addressing community use of school facilities (P=0·03). No associations were found between the strength of other district policies and school-level practices.
CONCLUSIONS: Nutrition educators and other health professionals should assist schools in periodically assessing their wellness practices to ensure compliance with district wellness policies and environments supportive of healthy behaviours.

Keywords

References

  1. Fed Regist. 2016 Jul 29;81(146):50151-70 [PMID: 27476196]
  2. Am J Prev Med. 2012 Sep;43(3):304-8 [PMID: 22898124]
  3. J Adolesc Health. 2009 Sep;45(3 Suppl):S30-7 [PMID: 19699434]
  4. Pediatrics. 2008 Jul;122(1):e251-9 [PMID: 18595970]
  5. Am J Prev Med. 2012 Dec;43(6):643-9 [PMID: 23159260]
  6. Milbank Q. 2009 Mar;87(1):71-100 [PMID: 19298416]
  7. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009 Jul;109(7):1256-62 [PMID: 19559146]
  8. Am J Public Health. 2012 Jul;102(7):1406-13 [PMID: 22420819]
  9. Am J Public Health. 2012 Aug;102(8):1594-9 [PMID: 22594746]
  10. J Phys Act Health. 2013 May;10(4):480-7 [PMID: 22820322]
  11. Child Obes. 2012 Aug;8(4):331-8 [PMID: 22867072]
  12. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012 Apr;166(4):311-6 [PMID: 22147763]
  13. J Sch Health. 2010 Nov;80(11):527-35; quiz 570-2 [PMID: 21039551]
  14. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010 Jul;110(7):1043-8 [PMID: 20630161]
  15. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49890 [PMID: 23166788]
  16. Public Health Rep. 2012 Mar-Apr;127(2):216-23 [PMID: 22379223]
  17. Health Promot Pract. 2014 Sep;15(5):622-8 [PMID: 24942750]
  18. Prev Chronic Dis. 2012;9:E118 [PMID: 22742592]
  19. J Sch Health. 2009 Nov;79(11):541-6 [PMID: 19840231]
  20. Am J Prev Med. 2013 Aug;45(2):143-9 [PMID: 23867020]
  21. J Sch Health. 2012 Jun;82(6):262-7 [PMID: 22568461]
  22. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012 Sep;112(9):1436-1442 [PMID: 22640775]
  23. J Sch Health. 2013 Nov;83(11):757-62 [PMID: 24138345]
  24. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2013 May-Jun;19(3 Suppl 1):S41-8 [PMID: 23529054]
  25. Prev Med. 2014 May;62:179-81 [PMID: 24518003]

Grants

  1. R01 HD070738/NICHD NIH HHS
  2. UL1 TR000114/NCATS NIH HHS
  3. 5R01HD070738/NICHD NIH HHS
  4. UL1TR000114/NCATS NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Beverages
Child
Drinking Water
Food Services
Fruit
Health Behavior
Health Education
Health Policy
Health Promotion
Humans
Minnesota
Motor Activity
Nutrition Policy
Obesity
School Health Services
Schools
Snacks
Students
Vegetables

Chemicals

Drinking Water

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0districtwellnesspoliciesstrengthschool-levelpracticesschoolsschoolMinnesotaactivityusepolicydataavailableSchooldistrictsnutritioneducationpromotionphysicalUSAfoodsinverselyrelatedfacilitiesNutritionDistrictOBJECTIVE:comparecorrespondingreportedprincipalsteachersDESIGN:District-levelcollectedwebsitesonlinerequestsmadeadministratorsautumn2013scoredusingWellnessAssessmentToolSchool-leveldrawn2012HealthProfilesprincipalteachersurveysNationalCenterEducationStatisticsCommonCoreDataGeneralizedestimatingequationsaccounteddemographicsnestingtwowithinusedexaminetenitemsfourteenrelevancestandardsSETTING:State-widesample180212publicRESULTS:meannumberenergy-densenutrient-poorsnackbeveragesstudentspurchaseregulatingvendingmachinesstoresP=0·01proportionjointagreementsharedaddressingcommunityP=0·03associationsfoundCONCLUSIONS:educatorshealthprofessionalsassistperiodicallyassessingensurecomplianceenvironmentssupportivehealthybehavioursCompetitivePhysicalSecondary

Similar Articles

Cited By