Leucopenia and treatment efficacy in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Zhen Su, Yan-Ping Mao, Pu-Yun OuYang, Jie Tang, Xiao-Wen Lan, Fang-Yun Xie
Author Information
  1. Zhen Su: Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060, China. suzhen@sysucc.org.cn.
  2. Yan-Ping Mao: Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060, China. maoyp@sysucc.org.cn.
  3. Pu-Yun OuYang: Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060, China. ouyangpy@sysucc.org.cn.
  4. Jie Tang: Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060, China. tangjie@sysucc.org.cn.
  5. Xiao-Wen Lan: Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060, China. lanxw@sysucc.org.cn.
  6. Fang-Yun Xie: Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060, China. xiefy0758@sina.com.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Leucopenia or neutropenia during chemotherapy predicts better survival in several cancers. We aimed to assess whether leucopenia could be a biological measure of treatment and a marker of efficacy in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (ANPC).
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 3826 patients with ANPC who received chemoradiotherapy. Leucopenia was categorised on the basis of worst grade during treatment according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria version 4.0: no leucopenia (grade 0), mild leucopenia (grade 1-2), and severe leucopenia (grade 3-4). Associations between leucopenia and survival were estimated by Cox proportional hazards model.
RESULTS: Of the 3826 patients, 2511 (65.6 %) developed mild leucopenia (grade 1-2) and 807 (21.1 %) developed severe leucopenia (grade 3-4) during treatment; 508 (13.3 %) did not. A multivariate Cox model that included leucopenia determined that the hazard ratios (HR) of death for patients with mild and severe leucopenia were 0.69 [95 % confidence interval (95 %CI) 0.56-0.85, p < 0.001] and 0.75 (95 %CI 0.59-0.95, p = 0.019), respectively; the HR of distant metastasis for patients with mild and severe leucopenia were 0.77 (95 %CI 0.61-0.96, p = 0.023) and 0.99 (95 %CI 0.77-1.29, p = 0.995), respectively. Leucopenia had no effect on locoregional relapse.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that mild leucopenia during chemoradiotherapy is associated with improved overall survival and distant metastasis-free survival in ANPC. Mild leucopenia may indicate appropriate dosage of chemotherapy. We can identify the patients who may benefit from chemotherapy if they experienced leucopenia during the treatment. Prospective trials are required to assess whether dosing adjustments based on leucopenia may improve chemotherapy efficacy.

References

  1. Eur J Cancer. 1998 Oct;34(11):1693-700 [PMID: 9893654]
  2. Cancer. 2001 Jun 15;91(12):2246-57 [PMID: 11413512]
  3. Br J Cancer. 2002 Apr 22;86(8):1297-302 [PMID: 11953888]
  4. Head Neck. 2012 Dec;34(12):1769-76 [PMID: 22318781]
  5. Lancet Oncol. 2005 Sep;6(9):669-77 [PMID: 16129367]
  6. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010 May;89(5):623-8 [PMID: 20423275]
  7. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Nov 1;23(31):8003-11 [PMID: 16204002]
  8. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2013 Mar;139(3):409-17 [PMID: 23124139]
  9. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2014 Oct;12(10):1454-87 [PMID: 25313184]
  10. Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jul;45(10):1757-63 [PMID: 19217278]
  11. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2006 Nov;18(9):678-83 [PMID: 17100153]
  12. World J Clin Oncol. 2011 Dec 10;2(12):377-83 [PMID: 22171280]
  13. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Jul 1;80(3):661-8 [PMID: 20643517]
  14. Radiother Oncol. 2012 Sep;104(3):331-7 [PMID: 22103978]
  15. Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Mar 1;13(5):1445-52 [PMID: 17332287]
  16. Lung Cancer. 2008 Dec;62(3):356-63 [PMID: 18501466]
  17. Ann Oncol. 2010 Dec;21(12):2403-9 [PMID: 20494962]
  18. Br J Cancer. 2003 Nov 17;89(10):1837-42 [PMID: 14612889]
  19. Chin J Cancer. 2012 Apr;31(4):185-96 [PMID: 22313595]
  20. Br J Cancer. 1999 Aug;80(11):1763-6 [PMID: 10468293]
  21. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2014 May;23(3):394-400 [PMID: 24033646]
  22. Acta Oncol. 2009;48(8):1204-6 [PMID: 19863230]
  23. Radiother Oncol. 2012 Sep;104(3):286-93 [PMID: 22995588]
  24. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Oct 1;21(19):3659-64 [PMID: 14512398]
  25. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Nov 1;75(3):742-50 [PMID: 19251378]
  26. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2008 Aug;6(7):646-95 [PMID: 18691457]
  27. Br J Cancer. 1997;75(2):301-5 [PMID: 9010042]
  28. Br J Cancer. 2007 Jul 2;97(1):37-42 [PMID: 17551497]
  29. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Jan 1;64(1):47-56 [PMID: 16377415]
  30. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2013 Nov;25(11):639-46 [PMID: 23910226]
  31. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2005 May;3(3):316-91 [PMID: 16002004]
  32. J Thorac Oncol. 2010 Sep;5(9):1397-403 [PMID: 20644495]
  33. Br J Cancer. 1999 Aug;80(11):1681 [PMID: 10468282]

MeSH Term

Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
Biomarkers
Carcinoma
Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Leukopenia
Male
Middle Aged
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms
Neoplasm Metastasis
Neoplasm Staging
Radiotherapy
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult

Chemicals

Biomarkers

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0leucopenia0gradetreatmentpatientsmild95Leucopeniachemotherapysurvivalsevere%%CIpefficacyANPC=mayassesswhetheradvancednasopharyngealcarcinoma3826chemoradiotherapy1-23-4CoxmodeldevelopedHRrespectivelydistantindicateBACKGROUND:neutropeniapredictsbetterseveralcancersaimedbiologicalmeasuremarkerMETHODS:retrospectivelyanalyzedreceivedcategorisedbasisworstaccordingNationalCancerInstituteCommonToxicityCriteriaversion40:AssociationsestimatedproportionalhazardsRESULTS:2511656807211508133multivariateincludeddeterminedhazardratiosdeath69[95confidenceinterval56-085<001]7559-0019metastasis7761-0960239977-129995effectlocoregionalrelapseCONCLUSIONS:resultsassociatedimprovedoverallmetastasis-freeMildappropriatedosagecanidentifybenefitexperiencedProspectivetrialsrequireddosingadjustmentsbasedimprove

Similar Articles

Cited By