Prevalence of gluteus medius weakness in people with chronic low back pain compared to healthy controls.

Nicholas A Cooper, Kelsey M Scavo, Kyle J Strickland, Natti Tipayamongkol, Jeffrey D Nicholson, Dennis C Bewyer, Kathleen A Sluka
Author Information
  1. Nicholas A Cooper: Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA. nicholas-cooper@uiowa.edu.
  2. Kelsey M Scavo: Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
  3. Kyle J Strickland: Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
  4. Natti Tipayamongkol: Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
  5. Jeffrey D Nicholson: Department of Rehabilitation Therapies, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
  6. Dennis C Bewyer: Department of Rehabilitation Therapies, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
  7. Kathleen A Sluka: Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.

Abstract

PURPOSE: Clinical observation suggests that hip abductor weakness is common in patients with low back pain (LBP). The purpose of this study is to describe and compare the prevalence of hip abductor weakness in a clinical population with chronic non-specific LBP and a matched sample without LBP.
METHODS: One hundred fifty subjects with chronic non-specific LBP and a matched cohort of 75 control subjects were recruited. A standardized back and hip physical exam was performed. Specifically tensor fascia lata, gluteus medius, and gluteus maximus strength were assessed with manual muscle testing. Functional assessment of the hip abductors was performed with assessment for the presence of the Trendelenburg sign. Palpation examination of the back, gluteal and hip region was performed to try and reproduce the subject's pain complaint. Friedman's test or Cochran's Q with post hoc comparisons adjusted for multiple comparisons was used to compare differences between healthy controls and people with chronic low back pain for both the affected and unaffected sides. Mann-Whitney U was used to compare differences in prevalence between groups. Hierarchical linear regression was used to identify predictors of LBP in this sample.
RESULTS: Gluteus medius is weaker in people with LBP compared to controls or the unaffected side (Friedman's test, p < 0.001). The Trendelenburg sign is more prevalent in subjects with LBP than controls (Cochran's Q, p < 0.001). There is more palpation tenderness over the gluteals, greater trochanter, and paraspinals in people with low back pain compared to controls (Cochran's Q, p < 0.001). Hierarchical linear regression, with BMI as a covariate, demonstrated that Gluteus medius weakness, low back regional tenderness, and male sex were predictive of LBP in this sample.
CONCLUSION: Gluteus medius weakness and gluteal muscle tenderness are common symptoms in people with chronic non-specific LBP. Future investigations should validate these findings with quantitative measures as well as investigate the effect of gluteus medius strengthening in people with LBP.

Keywords

References

  1. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010 Apr;24(2):193-204 [PMID: 20227641]
  2. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1985 Nov;67(5):741-6 [PMID: 4055873]
  3. J Sport Rehabil. 2010 Nov;19(4):422-35 [PMID: 21116011]
  4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;(3):CD000335 [PMID: 16034851]
  5. Spine J. 2008 Jan-Feb;8(1):114-20 [PMID: 18164459]
  6. Iowa Orthop J. 2003;23:57-60 [PMID: 14575251]
  7. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Oct 1;36(21 Suppl):S19-42 [PMID: 21952188]
  8. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2002 Sep;32(9):447-60 [PMID: 12322811]
  9. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 2;147(7):492-504 [PMID: 17909210]
  10. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jan 1;33(1):95-103 [PMID: 18165754]
  11. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998 Oct;(355):3-7 [PMID: 9917586]
  12. Iowa Orthop J. 2009;29:97-9 [PMID: 19742094]
  13. Spine J. 2008 Jan-Feb;8(1):96-113 [PMID: 18164458]
  14. Phys Ther. 1987 Jul;67(7):1072-6 [PMID: 3602100]
  15. J Sport Rehabil. 2014 Feb;23(1):56-64 [PMID: 24231811]
  16. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2008 Jun;23(5):545-53 [PMID: 18282648]
  17. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 2;147(7):478-91 [PMID: 17909209]
  18. Eur Spine J. 2011 Jan;20(1):19-39 [PMID: 20640863]
  19. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Jul 15;37(16):1347-56 [PMID: 22333955]
  20. Chiropr Osteopat. 2010 Jan 13;18:1 [PMID: 20157442]
  21. Postgrad Med. 1983 Feb;73(2):99-105, 108 [PMID: 6823467]
  22. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Apr;42(4):A1-57 [PMID: 22466247]
  23. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002 Jan;34(1):9-16 [PMID: 11782641]
  24. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jun;73(6):968-74 [PMID: 24665116]
  25. Pain. 1994 Sep;58(3):317-23 [PMID: 7838580]

Grants

  1. 25953527/PHS HHS

MeSH Term

Adult
Buttocks
Case-Control Studies
Female
Humans
Linear Models
Low Back Pain
Male
Middle Aged
Muscle Weakness
Muscle, Skeletal
Myalgia
Paraspinal Muscles
Prevalence
Thigh

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0LBPbackpainmediusweaknesspeoplehiplowchronicgluteuscontrolstendernessabductorcomparenon-specificsamplesubjectsperformedCochran'sQusedGluteuscomparedp < 0001commonprevalencematchedmuscleassessmentTrendelenburgsignglutealFriedman'stestcomparisonsdifferenceshealthyunaffectedHierarchicallinearregressionMusclePURPOSE:ClinicalobservationsuggestspatientspurposestudydescribeclinicalpopulationwithoutMETHODS:Onehundredfiftycohort75controlrecruitedstandardizedphysicalexamSpecificallytensorfascialatamaximusstrengthassessedmanualtestingFunctionalabductorspresencePalpationexaminationregiontryreproducesubject'scomplaintposthocadjustedmultipleaffectedsidesMann-WhitneyUgroupsidentifypredictorsRESULTS:weakersideprevalentpalpationglutealsgreatertrochanterparaspinalsBMIcovariatedemonstratedregionalmalesexpredictiveCONCLUSION:symptomsFutureinvestigationsvalidatefindingsquantitativemeasureswellinvestigateeffectstrengtheningPrevalenceHipLowMuscular

Similar Articles

Cited By