Provision of medical student teaching in UK general practices: a cross-sectional questionnaire study.

Alex Harding, Joe Rosenthal, Marwa Al-Seaidy, Denis Pereira Gray, Robert K McKinley, Society for Academic Primary Care (SAPC) Heads of Teaching Group
Author Information
  1. Alex Harding: University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter.
  2. Joe Rosenthal: University College London Medical School, London.
  3. Marwa Al-Seaidy: ST2 in general practice, Health Education South-West, Exeter.
  4. Denis Pereira Gray: University of Exeter, Exeter.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Health care is increasingly provided in general practice. To meet this demand, the English Department of Health recommends that 50% of all medical students should train for general practice after qualification. Currently 19% of medical students express general practice as their first career choice. Undergraduate exposure to general practice positively influences future career choice. Appropriate undergraduate exposure to general practice is therefore highly relevant to workforce planning
AIM: This study seeks to quantify current exposure of medical students to general practice and compare it with past provision and also with postgraduate provision.
DESIGN AND SETTING: A cross-sectional questionnaire in the UK.
METHOD: A questionnaire regarding provision of undergraduate teaching was sent to the general practice teaching leads in all UK medical schools. Information was gathered on the amount of undergraduate teaching, how this was supported financially, and whether there was an integrated department of general practice. The data were then compared with results from previous studies of teaching provision. The provision of postgraduate teaching in general practice was also examined.
RESULTS: General practice teaching for medical students increased from <1.0% of clinical teaching in 1968 to 13.0% by 2008; since then, the percentage has plateaued. The total amount of general practice teaching per student has fallen by 2 weeks since 2002. Medical schools providing financial data delivered 14.6% of the clinical curriculum and received 7.1% of clinical teaching funding. The number of departments of general practice has halved since 2002. Provision of postgraduate teaching has tripled since 2000.
CONCLUSION: Current levels of undergraduate teaching in general practice are too low to fulfil future workforce requirements and may be falling. Financial support for current teaching is disproportionately low and the mechanism counterproductive. Central intervention may be required to solve this.

Keywords

References

  1. Educ Prim Care. 2015 Jul;26(4):215-9 [PMID: 26253055]
  2. Br J Gen Pract. 2014 May;64(622):214-5 [PMID: 24771809]
  3. Educ Prim Care. 2013 Jul;24(4):237-43 [PMID: 23906166]
  4. Acad Med. 2010 Apr;85(4):599-604 [PMID: 20354374]
  5. Br J Gen Pract. 2011 Jul;61(588):e397-403 [PMID: 21722447]
  6. Med Educ. 1999 May;33(5):350-8 [PMID: 10336770]
  7. Lancet. 1968 Jan 13;1(7533):81-3 [PMID: 4169129]
  8. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1973 Feb;23 Suppl 1:1-12 [PMID: 4713321]
  9. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986 Jun 14;292(6535):1567-71 [PMID: 3087521]
  10. Med Educ. 2001 Feb;35(2):102-9 [PMID: 11169081]
  11. Acad Med. 2002 Aug;77(8):790-8 [PMID: 12176692]
  12. Fam Pract. 2003 Aug;20(4):360-1 [PMID: 12876101]

MeSH Term

Career Choice
Cross-Sectional Studies
Curriculum
Education, Medical, Undergraduate
General Practice
Humans
Program Evaluation
Students, Medical
Surveys and Questionnaires
United Kingdom

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0generalpracticeteachingmedicalstudentsprovisionundergraduatesinceexposureworkforcepostgraduatequestionnaireUKclinicalHealthcareerchoicefuturestudycurrentalsocross-sectionalschoolsamountdata0%student2002ProvisionlowmayBACKGROUND:careincreasinglyprovidedmeetdemandEnglishDepartmentrecommends50%trainqualificationCurrently19%expressfirstUndergraduatepositivelyinfluencesAppropriatethereforehighlyrelevantplanningAIM:seeksquantifycomparepastDESIGNANDSETTING:METHOD:regardingsentleadsInformationgatheredsupportedfinanciallywhetherintegrateddepartmentcomparedresultspreviousstudiesexaminedRESULTS:Generalincreased<11968132008percentageplateauedtotalperfallen2weeksMedicalprovidingfinancialdelivered146%curriculumreceived71%fundingnumberdepartmentshalvedtripled2000CONCLUSION:CurrentlevelsfulfilrequirementsfallingFinancialsupportdisproportionatelymechanismcounterproductiveCentralinterventionrequiredsolvethispractices:costprimaryhealthcare

Similar Articles

Cited By