Neonatal sacrococcygeal teratoma: our experience with 10 cases.

Shalini Sinha, Yogesh Kumar Sarin, Vidyanand P Deshpande
Author Information
  1. Shalini Sinha: Department of Pediatric Surgery, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi-1100021.
  2. Yogesh Kumar Sarin: Department of Pediatric Surgery, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi-1100021.
  3. Vidyanand P Deshpande: Department of Pediatric Surgery, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi-1100021.

Abstract

AIM: To analyse the outcome of neonatal sacrococcygeal teratomas (SCT) in our setup.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hospital records of 10 neonates, who were operated for SCT during 14 years time period, were retrieved and analysed. Letters were sent to 6 parents/ caretakers of children who were lost to follow up; none of them responded.
RESULTS: Seven girls and 3 boys with a mean age of 9 days (range 1-30 days) underwent excision of SCT in the neonatal period. Antenatal pickup rates were poor (2/10). Two patients presented with tumor rupture. Though all had an obvious mass at birth, only half of them presented on day 1 of life. The remaining 5 patients came late at a mean age of 11 days. Half of the SCTs were 10 cm or larger in size. One patient was misdiagnosed as meningomyelocoele. All underwent complete excision with coccygectomy by posterior approach in prone position. There were only 2 patients who could be classified as Altman Type II, the rest were all Altman Type I. Histopathology (HPE) revealed mature cystic teratoma (n=8), grade 1 immature teratoma (n=1) and grade 3 immature teratoma (n=1). There was no mortality; and complications were seen in 3/10 patients (1 neurogenic bladder, 1 major wound infection with ventriculitis and 1 minor wound infection). The mean follow up was 25 months (range 1 month to 6 years) in 4 patients with no recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: Neonatal SCTs are usually benign with a good outcome after complete surgical excision with a low complication rate. Although long term follow up has been advocated, the follow up was poor in this series.

Keywords

References

  1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Feb;156(2):393-6 [PMID: 3548370]
  2. Radiographics. 1994 May;14 (3):607-20; quiz 621-2 [PMID: 8066275]
  3. J Pediatr Surg. 1981 Jun;16(3):358-64 [PMID: 7252741]
  4. Cancer. 1993 Dec 15;72(12):3727-31 [PMID: 8252490]
  5. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1978 Aug;102(8):420-5 [PMID: 580884]
  6. Pediatr Surg Int. 2009 Mar;25(3):243-6 [PMID: 19189110]
  7. Teratology. 1982 Apr;25(2):201-13 [PMID: 7101198]
  8. J Pediatr Surg. 2004 Mar;39(3):430-8; discussion 430-8 [PMID: 15017565]
  9. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2012 Jul;63(1):80-4 [PMID: 22870372]
  10. Cancer. 1981 Jul 1;48(1):217-21 [PMID: 6165455]
  11. J Pediatr Surg. 1998 Jun;33(6):899-903 [PMID: 9660225]
  12. J Pediatr Surg. 1993 Sep;28(9):1158-60 [PMID: 7508500]
  13. Afr Health Sci. 2008 Mar;8(1):54-7 [PMID: 19357734]
  14. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Oct;187(4):W350-6 [PMID: 16985105]
  15. Pediatr Surg Int. 2002 Sep;18(5-6):384-7 [PMID: 12415361]
  16. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1993 May;22(3):377-80 [PMID: 8373123]
  17. J Pediatr Surg. 1998 Feb;33(2):171-6 [PMID: 9498381]
  18. Radiology. 1980 Dec;137(3):653-5 [PMID: 7444051]
  19. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Jun;9(6):425-8 [PMID: 9239831]
  20. J Pediatr Surg. 2006 Jan;41(1):173-81; discussion 173-81 [PMID: 16410129]
  21. J Pediatr Orthop. 1991 Sep-Oct;11(5):603-7 [PMID: 1918346]
  22. J Pediatr Surg. 1998 Feb;33(2):177-9 [PMID: 9498382]
  23. Fetal Diagn Ther. 1998 Sep-Oct;13(5):305-8 [PMID: 9813425]
  24. J Pediatr Surg. 1974 Jun;9(3):389-98 [PMID: 4843993]
  25. Curr Surg. 2006 Jan-Feb;63(1):51-4 [PMID: 16373161]
  26. J Pediatr Surg. 1990 Dec;25(12 ):1287-91 [PMID: 2286911]
  27. Curr Opin Pediatr. 1996 Jun;8(3):287-92 [PMID: 8814409]
  28. Postgrad Med J. 2000 Dec;76(902):754-9 [PMID: 11085765]
  29. Ann Surg. 1980 Mar;191(3):382-4 [PMID: 7362303]
  30. Lancet. 1997 Feb 22;349(9051):538 [PMID: 9048793]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.01patientsfollowteratomaSCT10meandaysexcisionoutcomeneonatalsacrococcygealyearsperiod63agerangeunderwentpoorpresentedSCTscompleteAltmanTypegradeimmaturen=1woundinfectionNeonatalAIM:analyseteratomassetupMATERIALSANDMETHODS:Hospitalrecordsneonatesoperated14timeretrievedanalysedLetterssentparents/caretakerschildrenlostnonerespondedRESULTS:Sevengirlsboys91-30Antenatalpickuprates2/10TwotumorruptureThoughobviousmassbirthhalfdayliferemaining5camelate11HalfcmlargersizeOnepatientmisdiagnosedmeningomyelocoelecoccygectomyposteriorapproachproneposition2classifiedIIrestHistopathologyHPErevealedmaturecysticn=8mortalitycomplicationsseen3/10neurogenicbladdermajorventriculitisminor25monthsmonth4recurrenceCONCLUSIONS:usuallybenigngoodsurgicallowcomplicationrateAlthoughlongtermadvocatedseriesteratoma:experiencecasesSacrococcygeal

Similar Articles

Cited By