Cognitive remediation for adolescents with 22q11 deletion syndrome (22q11DS): a preliminary study examining effectiveness, feasibility, and fidelity of a hybrid strategy, remote and computer-based intervention.

Margaret A Mariano, Kerri Tang, Matthew Kurtz, Wendy R Kates
Author Information
  1. Margaret A Mariano: Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, State University of New York at Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, United States.
  2. Kerri Tang: Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, State University of New York at Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, United States.
  3. Matthew Kurtz: Department of Psychology and Neuroscience and Behavior, Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT, United States.
  4. Wendy R Kates: Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, State University of New York at Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, United States. Electronic address: katesw@upstate.edu.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: 22q11DS is a multiple anomaly syndrome involving intellectual and behavioral deficits, and increased risk for schizophrenia. As cognitive remediation (CR) has recently been found to improve cognition in younger patients with schizophrenia, we investigated the efficacy, feasibility, and fidelity of a remote, hybrid strategy, computerized CR program in youth with 22q11DS.
METHODS: A longitudinal design was implemented in which 21 Participants served as their own controls. Following an eight month baseline period in which no interventions were provided, cognitive coaches met with Participants remotely for CR via video conferencing three times a week over a targeted 8month timeframe and facilitated their progress through the intervention, offering task-specific strategies. A subset of strategies were examined for fidelity. Outcomes were evaluated using a neurocognitive test battery at baseline, pre-treatment and post-treatment.
RESULTS: All Participants adhered to the intervention. The mean length of the treatment phase was 7.96months. A moderately high correlation (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.73) was found for amount and type of strategies offered by coaches. Participants exhibited significant improvements (ES=.36-.55, p≤.009) in working memory, shifting attention and cognitive flexibility. All significant models were driven by improvements in pre to post-treatment scores.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on our preliminary investigation, a remote, hybrid strategy, computerized CR program can be implemented with 22q11DS youth despite geographic location, health, and cognitive deficits. It appears effective in enhancing cognitive skills during the developmental period of adolescence, making this type of CR delivery useful for youth with 22q11DS transitioning into post-school environments.

Keywords

References

  1. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2012 Jan;159B(1):87-93 [PMID: 22170773]
  2. Brain Lang. 2004 Apr;89(1):122-35 [PMID: 15010244]
  3. Schizophr Res. 2004 Oct 1;70(2-3):223-32 [PMID: 15329299]
  4. Schizophr Bull. 2015 Jan;41(1):250-8 [PMID: 24444862]
  5. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2010 Apr;44(4):364-71 [PMID: 20307169]
  6. Schizophr Res. 2007 Aug;94(1-3):221-30 [PMID: 17524620]
  7. Schizophr Bull. 1996;22(2):201-22 [PMID: 8782282]
  8. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2006 Oct;21(7):623-43 [PMID: 17014981]
  9. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2012 May;51(5):464-6 [PMID: 22525952]
  10. Schizophr Bull. 2011 Sep;37 Suppl 2:S80-90 [PMID: 21860051]
  11. Behav Cogn Psychother. 2014 Jul;42(4):421-34 [PMID: 23631951]
  12. Schizophr Res. 2006 Oct;87(1-3):261-9 [PMID: 16737798]
  13. Schizophr Res. 2012 Aug;139(1-3):151-6 [PMID: 22627123]
  14. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2009 Jan;15(1):31-41 [PMID: 19128526]
  15. Am J Psychiatry. 2003 Sep;160(9):1580-6 [PMID: 12944331]
  16. Res Dev Disabil. 2013 May;34(5):1758-69 [PMID: 23506790]
  17. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2014 Feb;8(1):32-8 [PMID: 23343011]
  18. Schizophr Bull. 2000;26(4):801-16 [PMID: 11087013]
  19. J Med Genet. 1997 Jun;34(6):453-8 [PMID: 9192263]
  20. Am J Psychiatry. 2012 Jul;169(7):710-8 [PMID: 22581070]
  21. Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Sep;34(9):2606-13 [PMID: 23751300]
  22. Psychol Med. 2014 Apr;44(6):1267-77 [PMID: 24016317]
  23. Child Neuropsychol. 2005 Feb;11(1):21-37 [PMID: 15823981]
  24. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:167-202 [PMID: 11283309]
  25. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999 Oct;56(10):940-5 [PMID: 10530637]
  26. Am J Psychiatry. 2011 May;168(5):472-85 [PMID: 21406461]
  27. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2009 Nov;48(11):1060-8 [PMID: 19797984]
  28. Brain Inj. 1997 Mar;11(3):197-209 [PMID: 9058001]
  29. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001 Aug;58(8):763-8 [PMID: 11483142]
  30. Medscape J Med. 2008;10(4):90 [PMID: 18504479]
  31. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004 Sep;61(9):866-76 [PMID: 15351765]
  32. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2013 Mar;26(2):151-7 [PMID: 23318663]
  33. Schizophr Res. 2009 Sep;113(2-3):252-8 [PMID: 19524409]
  34. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2002;109(1):101-17 [PMID: 11793166]
  35. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2013 Mar;21(3):218-30 [PMID: 23395189]
  36. Schizophr Res. 2007 Jan;89(1-3):251-60 [PMID: 17070671]
  37. Schizophr Res. 2013 Feb;143(2-3):397-8 [PMID: 23290608]
  38. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2005 Apr;44(4):377-84 [PMID: 15782085]
  39. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014 Aug;53(8):859-68 [PMID: 25062593]
  40. Front Psychol. 2014 Jun 10;5:566 [PMID: 24959159]
  41. Genet Med. 2001 Jan-Feb;3(1):34-9 [PMID: 11339375]
  42. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2005 Mar;111(3):193-201 [PMID: 15701103]
  43. Schizophr Bull. 2009 Mar;35(2):347-61 [PMID: 19176470]

Grants

  1. R21 MH085901/NIMH NIH HHS
  2. R33 MH085901/NIMH NIH HHS
  3. R21/R33 MH085901/NIMH NIH HHS

MeSH Term

22q11 Deletion Syndrome
Adolescent
Attention
Child
Cognition
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
Computers
Executive Function
Feasibility Studies
Female
Humans
Intelligence Tests
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Memory, Short-Term
Neuropsychological Tests
Telemedicine
Treatment Outcome
Video Recording

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.022q11DScognitiveCRsyndromeremediationfidelityremotehybridstrategyyouthparticipantsinterventionstrategiesdeficitsschizophreniafoundfeasibilitycomputerizedprogramimplementedbaselineperiodcoachespost-treatmentcorrelationtypesignificantimprovementspreliminaryCognitiveBACKGROUND:multipleanomalyinvolvingintellectualbehavioralincreasedriskrecentlyimprovecognitionyoungerpatientsinvestigatedefficacyMETHODS:longitudinaldesign21servedcontrolsFollowingeightmonthinterventionsprovidedmetremotelyviavideoconferencingthreetimesweektargeted8monthtimeframefacilitatedprogressofferingtask-specificsubsetexaminedOutcomesevaluatedusingneurocognitivetestbatterypre-treatmentRESULTS:adheredmeanlengthtreatmentphase796monthsmoderatelyhighintraclasscoefficient073amountofferedParticipantsexhibitedES=36-55p≤009workingmemoryshiftingattentionflexibilitymodelsdrivenprescoresCONCLUSIONS:Basedinvestigationcandespitegeographiclocationhealthappearseffectiveenhancingskillsdevelopmentaladolescencemakingdeliveryusefultransitioningpost-schoolenvironmentsadolescents22q11deletion:studyexaminingeffectivenesscomputer-basedAdolescentsRemoteSchizophreniaVelocardiofacial

Similar Articles

Cited By