Heavy metal accumulation in soils and grains, and health risks associated with use of treated municipal wastewater in subsurface drip irrigation.

Kamran Asgari, Wim M Cornelis
Author Information
  1. Kamran Asgari: Young Researchers and Elite Club, Khorasgan (Isfahan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran, KAMRAN.ASGARI@stu.sku.ac.ir.

Abstract

Constant use of treated wastewater (TWW) for irrigation over prolonged periods may cause buildup of heavy metals up to toxic levels for plants and animals, and entails environmental hazards in different aspects. However, application of TWW on agricultural land might be an effective and sustainable strategy in arid and semi-arid countries where fresh water resources are under great pressure, as long as potential harmful effects on the environment including soil, plants, and fresh water resources, and health risks to humans are minimized. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of deep emitters on limiting potential heavy metal accumulation in soils and grains, and health risk under drip irrigation with treated municipal wastewater. A field experiment was conducted according to a split block design with two treatments (fresh and wastewater) and three sub-treatments (0, 15, and 30 cm depth of emitters) in four replicates on a sandy loam Calcic Argigypsids, in Esfahan, Iran. The annual rainfall is about 123 mm, mean annual ETo is 1457 mm, and the elevation is 1590 m above sea level. A two-crop rotation of wheat (Triticum spp.) and corn (Zea mays) was established on each plot with wheat growing from February to June and corn from July to September. Soil samples were collected before planting and after harvesting for each crop in each year. Edible grain samples of corn and wheat were collected at harvest. Elemental concentrations (Cu, Zn, Cd, Pb, Cr, Ni) in soil and grains were determined using an atomic absorption spectrophotometer. Results showed that the concentrations of heavy metals in the wastewater-irrigated soils were not significantly different (P > 0.05) compared with the freshwater-irrigated soils. No significant difference (P > 0.05) in heavy metal content in soil between different depths of emitters was found. A pollution load index (PLI) showed that there was no substantial buildup of heavy metals in the wastewater-irrigated soils compared to the freshwater-irrigated soils. Cu, Pb, and Zn concentrations in wheat and corn grains were within the permissible US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) limits, but concentrations of Cd (in wheat and corn) and Cr (in corn) were above the safe limits of the EPA. In addition, concentrations of Ni in wheat and corn seeds were several folds higher than the EPA standards. A health risk index (HRI) which is usually adopted to assess the health risk to hazard materials in foods showed values higher than 1 for Cd, particularly for wheat grain (HRI >2.5). Results also showed that intake of Cu through consumption of edible wheat grains posed a relatively high potential health risk to children (HRI >1.4), whereas children might also be exposed to health risk from Cd and Cr from corn grains (HRI >1.4). Based on aforementioned results, it can be concluded that the emitter depth in drip irrigation does not play a significant role in the accumulation of heavy metals from TWW in our sandy loam soil. Although their accumulation in the soil was limited and similar to using freshwater, uptake of Cd and Cr by wheat and corn was relatively large and hence resulted in health risk. The results suggest that more attention should be directed towards cultivation of other crops with drip irrigation system for a safe and more productive use of wastewater for irrigation. Alternatively, methods that filter the wastewater before it enters the soil environment might be an option that needs further investigation.

References

  1. Environ Int. 2004 Aug;30(6):785-91 [PMID: 15120196]
  2. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2001 Sep;67(3):423-30 [PMID: 11479673]
  3. J Hazard Mater. 2012 Aug 15;227-228:148-54 [PMID: 22657103]
  4. J Environ Sci (China). 2006;18(6):1135-41 [PMID: 17294954]
  5. J Sci Food Agric. 2010 Jan 30;90(2):314-20 [PMID: 20355048]
  6. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2014 Feb;100:258-65 [PMID: 24135422]
  7. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2014 Sep;21(17 ):10083-95 [PMID: 24862481]
  8. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2013 Apr;90:76-81 [PMID: 23321363]
  9. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2003 Apr;13(3):175-9 [PMID: 21782652]
  10. Environ Geochem Health. 2014 Feb;36(1):169-82 [PMID: 23771812]
  11. J Hazard Mater. 2010 Jul 15;179(1-3):612-21 [PMID: 20399016]
  12. Environ Int. 2015 Apr;77:5-15 [PMID: 25603422]
  13. Chem Cent J. 2011 Oct 22;5:64 [PMID: 22017878]
  14. Sci Total Environ. 2005 Nov 1;350(1-3):28-37 [PMID: 16227070]
  15. Sci Total Environ. 2013 Oct 1;463-464:530-40 [PMID: 23831799]
  16. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2008 Mar;69(3):513-24 [PMID: 17555815]
  17. Environ Int. 2005 Aug;31(6):805-12 [PMID: 15979146]
  18. Sci Total Environ. 2014 Feb 1;470-471:340-7 [PMID: 24144938]
  19. Food Chem Toxicol. 2010 Feb;48(2):611-9 [PMID: 19941927]
  20. Environ Int. 2007 Feb;33(2):206-18 [PMID: 17074391]
  21. Environ Pollut. 2014 Feb;185:158-67 [PMID: 24284198]
  22. Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Feb 1;43(3):637-42 [PMID: 19244995]
  23. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2012 Feb;76(2):200-8 [PMID: 22019253]
  24. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2012 Nov;85:120-30 [PMID: 22921257]
  25. Sci Total Environ. 2000 Apr 17;249(1-3):331-46 [PMID: 10813462]
  26. Food Chem Toxicol. 2013 Aug;58:449-58 [PMID: 23721688]
  27. Sci Total Environ. 2009 Feb 15;407(5):1551-61 [PMID: 19068266]
  28. Environ Pollut. 2008 Apr;152(3):686-92 [PMID: 17720286]

MeSH Term

Adult
Agriculture
Child
Edible Grain
Environmental Monitoring
Food Contamination
Fresh Water
Humans
Iran
Metals, Heavy
Risk Assessment
Soil Pollutants
Triticum
United States
Waste Disposal, Fluid
Wastewater
Zea mays

Chemicals

Metals, Heavy
Soil Pollutants
Waste Water

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0wheatcornhealthwastewaterirrigationheavysoilsoilsgrainsriskconcentrationsCdmetalsaccumulationdripCrshowedHRIusetreatedTWWdifferentmightfreshpotentialemittersmetalCuEPAbuildupplantswaterresourcesenvironmentrisksassessmunicipaldepthsandyloamannualsamplescollectedgrainZnPbNiusingResultswastewater-irrigatedP > 005comparedfreshwater-irrigatedsignificantindexlimitssafehigheralsorelativelychildren>14resultsConstantprolongedperiodsmaycausetoxiclevelsanimalsentailsenvironmentalhazardsaspectsHoweverapplicationagriculturallandeffectivesustainablestrategyaridsemi-aridcountriesgreatpressurelongharmfuleffectsincludinghumansminimizedaimstudyeffectdeeplimitingfieldexperimentconductedaccordingsplitblockdesigntwotreatmentsthreesub-treatments01530 cmfourreplicatesCalcicArgigypsidsEsfahanIranrainfall123 mmmeanETo1457 mmelevation1590 msealeveltwo-croprotationTriticumsppZeamaysestablishedplotgrowingFebruaryJuneJulySeptemberSoilplantingharvestingcropyearEdibleharvestElementaldeterminedatomicabsorptionspectrophotometersignificantlydifferencecontentdepthsfoundpollutionloadPLIsubstantialwithinpermissibleUSEnvironmentalProtectionAgencyadditionseedsseveralfoldsstandardsusuallyadoptedhazardmaterialsfoodsvalues1particularly>25intakeconsumptionedibleposedhighwhereasexposedBasedaforementionedcanconcludedemitterplayroleAlthoughlimitedsimilarfreshwateruptakelargehenceresultedsuggestattentiondirectedtowardscultivationcropssystemproductiveAlternativelymethodsfilterentersoptionneedsinvestigationHeavyassociatedsubsurface

Similar Articles

Cited By