Go when you know: Chimpanzees' confidence movements reflect their responses in a computerized memory task.

Michael J Beran, Bonnie M Perdue, Sara E Futch, J David Smith, Theodore A Evans, Audrey E Parrish
Author Information
  1. Michael J Beran: Language Research Center and Department of Psychology, Georgia State University, United States. Electronic address: mjberan@yahoo.com.
  2. Bonnie M Perdue: Department of Psychology, Agnes Scott College, United States.
  3. Sara E Futch: Department of Psychology, Wofford College, United States.
  4. J David Smith: Department of Psychology, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, United States.
  5. Theodore A Evans: Language Research Center, Georgia State University, United States.
  6. Audrey E Parrish: Language Research Center and Department of Psychology, Georgia State University, United States.

Abstract

Three chimpanzees performed a computerized memory task in which auditory feedback about the accuracy of each response was delayed. The delivery of food rewards for correct responses also was delayed and occurred in a separate location from the response. Crucially, if the chimpanzees did not move to the reward-delivery site before food was dispensed, the reward was lost and could not be recovered. Chimpanzees were significantly more likely to move to the dispenser on trials they had completed correctly than on those they had completed incorrectly, and these movements occurred before any external feedback about the outcome of their responses. Thus, chimpanzees moved (or not) on the basis of their confidence in their responses, and these confidence movements aligned closely with objective task performance. These untrained, spontaneous confidence judgments demonstrated that chimpanzees monitored their own states of knowing and not knowing and adjusted their behavior accordingly.

Keywords

References

  1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Apr 24;98(9):5359-62 [PMID: 11274360]
  2. J Exp Anal Behav. 2002 Nov;78(3):497-508 [PMID: 12507016]
  3. Anim Cogn. 2004 Oct;7(4):239-46 [PMID: 15105996]
  4. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2004 Jul;30(3):203-12 [PMID: 15279511]
  5. J Gen Psychol. 2005 Apr;132(2):165-86 [PMID: 15871299]
  6. Behav Processes. 2006 May 1;72(2):184-9 [PMID: 16460887]
  7. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2006 Apr;32(2):111-9 [PMID: 16634654]
  8. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2006 May;135(2):282-97 [PMID: 16719654]
  9. Curr Biol. 2007 Mar 20;17(6):551-5 [PMID: 17346969]
  10. Psychol Sci. 2007 Jan;18(1):64-71 [PMID: 17362380]
  11. Anim Cogn. 2008 Jan;11(1):21-42 [PMID: 17437141]
  12. Mem Cognit. 2008 Jan;36(1):9-19 [PMID: 18323058]
  13. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2008 Apr;34(2):266-82 [PMID: 18426309]
  14. Anim Cogn. 2009 Jan;12(1):169-80 [PMID: 18712532]
  15. Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Aug;15(4):679-91 [PMID: 18792496]
  16. Dev Sci. 2008 Sep;11(5):750-60 [PMID: 18801131]
  17. Anim Cogn. 2009 Jul;12(4):575-85 [PMID: 19242741]
  18. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2009 Apr;35(2):129-42 [PMID: 19364222]
  19. Behav Brain Sci. 2009 Apr;32(2):121-38; discussion 138-82 [PMID: 19386144]
  20. Memory. 2009 Jul;17(5):493-501 [PMID: 19468957]
  21. Anim Cogn. 2010 Jan;13(1):93-101 [PMID: 19526256]
  22. Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Sep;13(9):389-96 [PMID: 19726218]
  23. Comp Cogn Behav Rev. 2009 Jan 1;4:17-28 [PMID: 20046911]
  24. Anim Cogn. 2010 Sep;13(5):689-700 [PMID: 20306102]
  25. Anim Cogn. 2011 Jan;14(1):83-93 [PMID: 20665063]
  26. Learn Behav. 2011 Mar;39(1):1-11 [PMID: 21264568]
  27. Cognition. 2011 Jul;120(1):90-105 [PMID: 21459372]
  28. Anim Cogn. 2012 Mar;15(2):187-99 [PMID: 21909935]
  29. Anim Cogn. 2012 May;15(3):293-304 [PMID: 21918872]
  30. J Comp Psychol. 2012 Aug;126(3):263-78 [PMID: 22023265]
  31. Anim Cogn. 2012 May;15(3):409-19 [PMID: 22183204]
  32. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 May;38(3):686-708 [PMID: 22250905]
  33. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 May 19;367(1594):1297-309 [PMID: 22492748]
  34. Anim Cogn. 2013 Jan;16(1):65-84 [PMID: 22923213]
  35. Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64:417-44 [PMID: 23020639]
  36. Anim Cogn. 2013 Mar;16(2):211-21 [PMID: 23065184]
  37. Anim Cogn. 2013 Mar;16(2):241-54 [PMID: 23065186]
  38. Psychol Sci. 2013 May;24(5):660-6 [PMID: 23508741]
  39. Anim Cogn. 2014 Mar;17(2):249-57 [PMID: 23812677]
  40. J Comp Psychol. 2014 May;128(2):143-9 [PMID: 23875919]
  41. J Comp Psychol. 2014 May;128(2):152-4; discussion 160-2 [PMID: 24866006]
  42. J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2014 Apr;40(2):249-59 [PMID: 24893220]
  43. Anim Cogn. 2014 Nov;17(6):1353-64 [PMID: 24950721]
  44. PLoS One. 2015 Feb 23;10(2):e0118408 [PMID: 25706561]
  45. Comp Cogn Behav Rev. 2009;4:54-55 [PMID: 26478758]
  46. Curr Zool. 2011;57(4):531-542 [PMID: 26779256]
  47. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1994 Sep;123(3):297-315 [PMID: 7931094]
  48. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1995 Dec;124(4):391-408 [PMID: 8530911]
  49. Psychol Rev. 1996 Jul;103(3):490-517 [PMID: 8759045]
  50. Cognition. 1997 Jan;62(1):75-97 [PMID: 8997171]
  51. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1997 Jun;126(2):147-64 [PMID: 9163934]
  52. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1998 Mar;127(1):55-68 [PMID: 9503651]
  53. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1998 Sep;127(3):227-50 [PMID: 9742715]

Grants

  1. P01 HD060563/NICHD NIH HHS
  2. R01 HD061455/NICHD NIH HHS
  3. HD060563/NICHD NIH HHS
  4. HD061455/NICHD NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Acoustic Stimulation
Animals
Female
Formative Feedback
Judgment
Male
Memory
Metacognition
Movement
Pan troglodytes
Reward
Task Performance and Analysis

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0chimpanzeesresponsesconfidencetaskmovementscomputerizedmemoryfeedbackresponsedelayedfoodoccurredmoveChimpanzeescompletedjudgmentsknowingThreeperformedauditoryaccuracydeliveryrewardscorrectalsoseparatelocationCruciallyreward-deliverysitedispensedrewardlostrecoveredsignificantlylikelydispensertrialscorrectlyincorrectlyexternaloutcomeThusmovedbasisalignedcloselyobjectiveperformanceuntrainedspontaneousdemonstratedmonitoredstatesadjustedbehavioraccordinglyGoknow:Chimpanzees'reflectConfidenceMatching-to-sampleMemoryMetacognition

Similar Articles

Cited By