Implementation of Free Text Format Nursing Diagnoses at a University Hospital's Medical Department. Exploring Nurses' and Nursing Students' Experiences on Use and Usefulness. A Qualitative Study.

Sigrun Aasen Frigstad, Torunn Hatlen Nøst, Beate André
Author Information
  1. Sigrun Aasen Frigstad: Faculty of Nursing, Sør-Trøndelag University College (HiST), Postboks 2320, 7004 Trondheim, Norway.
  2. Torunn Hatlen Nøst: St. Olav's Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Postboks 3250, 7006 Trondheim, Norway.
  3. Beate André: Faculty of Nursing, Sør-Trøndelag University College (HiST), Postboks 2320, 7004 Trondheim, Norway.

Abstract

Background. Nursing documentation has long traditions and represents core element of nursing, but the documentation is often criticized of being incomplete. Nursing diagnoses are an important research topic in nursing in terms of quality of nursing assessment, interventions, and outcome in addition to facilitating communication and continuity. Aim. The aim of this study was to explore the nurses' and nursing students' experiences after implementing free text format nursing diagnoses in a medical department. Method. The study design included educational intervention of free text nursing diagnoses. Data was collected through five focus group interviews with 18 nurses and 6 students as informants. The data was analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Results. The informants describe positive experiences concerning free text format nursing diagnoses' use and usefulness; it promotes reflection and discussion and is described as a useful tool in the diagnostic process, though it was challenging to find the diagnosis' appropriate formulation. Conclusion. Our findings indicate a valid usability of free text format nursing diagnoses as it promotes the diagnostic process. The use seems to enhance critical thinking and may serve as valuable preparation towards an implementation of standardized nursing diagnoses. Use and support of key personnel seem valuable in an implementation process.

References

  1. Nurse Educ Today. 2013 Sep;33(9):935-7 [PMID: 23218906]
  2. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif. 2003 Jul-Sep;14(3):96-107 [PMID: 14649031]
  3. NI 2012 (2012). 2012 Jun 23;2012:108 [PMID: 24199065]
  4. J Adv Nurs. 2011 Sep;67(9):1858-75 [PMID: 21466578]
  5. Nurse Educ Today. 2013 Mar;33(3):297-302 [PMID: 22795745]
  6. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif. 2010 Apr-Jun;21(2):82-8 [PMID: 20500615]
  7. Nurse Educ. 2010 Jul-Aug;35(4):156-61 [PMID: 20548183]
  8. Nurse Educ Today. 2014 Mar;34(3):362-71 [PMID: 23830067]
  9. Contemp Nurse. 2012 Jun;41(2):160-8 [PMID: 22800381]
  10. Nurse Educ Pract. 2013 Sep;13(5):437-41 [PMID: 23140800]
  11. Comput Inform Nurs. 2008 Jul-Aug;26(4):183-9 [PMID: 18600124]
  12. Nurse Educ Today. 2014 Oct;34(10):1311-23 [PMID: 23786869]
  13. Int J Nurs Pract. 2009 Aug;15(4):280-6 [PMID: 19703044]
  14. J Adv Nurs. 2010 Jun;66(6):1388-400 [PMID: 20546369]
  15. J Clin Nurs. 2010 Jan;19(1-2):100-8 [PMID: 20500248]
  16. Am J Crit Care. 2013 Jul;22(4):306-13 [PMID: 23817819]
  17. J Adv Nurs. 2006 Dec;56(5):514-31 [PMID: 17078827]
  18. J Nurs Manag. 2011 Jan;19(1):143-52 [PMID: 21223414]
  19. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21;(1):CD002099 [PMID: 19160206]
  20. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;(4):CD000409 [PMID: 17943742]
  21. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif. 2010 Jul-Sep;21(3):124-33 [PMID: 20646090]
  22. BMC Nurs. 2012 Aug 01;11:11 [PMID: 22852577]
  23. Nurse Educ Today. 2014 Nov;34(11):1357-60 [PMID: 24713126]
  24. Palliat Support Care. 2013 Apr;11(2):135-40 [PMID: 23089522]
  25. Scand J Caring Sci. 2014 Dec;28(4):629-47 [PMID: 24245661]
  26. J Clin Nurs. 2011 Sep;20(17-18):2386-403 [PMID: 21676043]
  27. J Prof Nurs. 2010 Jul-Aug;26(4):232-41 [PMID: 20637445]
  28. Nurse Educ Today. 2004 Feb;24(2):105-12 [PMID: 14769454]
  29. Nurse Educ Today. 2010 Jan;30(1):73-7 [PMID: 19581026]
  30. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Aug 10;(8):CD000125 [PMID: 21833939]
  31. Comput Inform Nurs. 2011 Oct;29(10):599-607 [PMID: 22041791]
  32. J Clin Nurs. 2006 Aug;15(8):936-45 [PMID: 16879537]
  33. Int J Nurs Knowl. 2013 Oct;24(3):163-70 [PMID: 23859641]
  34. J Adv Nurs. 2010 Nov;66(11):2481-9 [PMID: 20735494]
  35. Implement Sci. 2012 May 31;7:50 [PMID: 22651257]
  36. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif. 2009 Jan-Mar;20(1):9-15 [PMID: 19207524]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0nursingdiagnosesNursingfreetextformatprocessdocumentationstudyexperiencesinformantsusepromotesdiagnosticvaluableimplementationUseBackgroundlongtraditionsrepresentscoreelementoftencriticizedincompleteimportantresearchtopictermsqualityassessmentinterventionsoutcomeadditionfacilitatingcommunicationcontinuityAimaimexplorenurses'students'implementingmedicaldepartmentMethoddesignincludededucationalinterventionDatacollectedfivefocusgroupinterviews18nurses6studentsdataanalyzedusingqualitativecontentanalysisResultsdescribepositiveconcerningdiagnoses'usefulnessreflectiondiscussiondescribedusefultoolthoughchallengingfinddiagnosis'appropriateformulationConclusionfindingsindicatevalidusabilityseemsenhancecriticalthinkingmayservepreparationtowardsstandardizedsupportkeypersonnelseemImplementationFreeTextFormatDiagnosesUniversityHospital'sMedicalDepartmentExploringNurses'Students'ExperiencesUsefulnessQualitativeStudy

Similar Articles

Cited By (5)