Brief Intervention for Heavy Drinking in Primary Care: Role of Patient Initiation.

Gail L Rose, Sarah E Guth, Gary J Badger, Dennis A Plante, Tera L Fazzino, John E Helzer
Author Information
  1. Gail L Rose: Department of Psychiatry (GLR, SEG, JEH), Department of Medical Biostatistics (GJB), and Department of General Internal Medicine (DAP), University of Vermont, College of Medicine, Burlington, VT; and Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health (TLF), University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Alcohol brief intervention (BI) in primary care (PC) is effective, but remains underutilized despite multiple efforts to increase provider-initiated BI. An alternative approach to promote BI is to prompt patients to initiate alcohol-related discussions. Little is known about the role of patients in BI delivery.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the characteristics of PC patients who reported initiating BI with their providers, and to evaluate the association between the initiator (patient vs provider) and drinking after a BI.
METHODS: In the context of clinical trial, patients (n = 267) who received BI during a PC visit reported on the manner in which the BI was initiated, readiness to change, demographics, and recent history of alcohol consumption. Drinking was assessed again at 6-months after the BI.
RESULTS: Fifty percent of patients receiving a BI reported initiating the discussion of drinking themselves. Compared with those who reported a provider-initiated discussion, self-initiators were significantly younger (43.7 years vs 47.1 years; P = 0.03), more likely to meet Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) criteria for current major depression (24% vs 14%; P = 0.04), and more likely to report a history of alcohol withdrawal symptoms (68% vs 52%; P < 0.01). Baseline readiness to change, baseline consumption rates, and current DSM-IV alcohol dependence were not different between groups. In the 2 to 3 weeks after BI, self-initiators reported greater decreases in drinks per week (5.7 vs 2.4; P = 0.02), and drinking days per week (1.0 vs 0.3; P = 0.002). At 6-month follow-up, self-initiators showed significantly greater reductions in weekly drinking compared to those whose provider initiated the BI (P = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: Patient- and provider-initiated BI occurred with equal frequency, and patient-initiated BIs were associated with greater reductions in alcohol use. Future efforts to increase the BI rate in PC should include a focus on prompting patients to initiate alcohol-related discussions.

References

  1. Addict Behav. 1992 Sep-Oct;17(5):507-11 [PMID: 1442242]
  2. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1981 Apr;38(4):381-9 [PMID: 6260053]
  3. Alcohol Alcohol. 2014 Jan-Feb;49(1):66-78 [PMID: 24232177]
  4. Aust N Z J Public Health. 1998 Apr;22(2):206-9 [PMID: 9744177]
  5. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2004 Jun;23(2):167-70 [PMID: 15370022]
  6. J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Jul;21(7):698-703 [PMID: 16808769]
  7. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2006 Mar;24(1):5-15 [PMID: 16464809]
  8. J Stud Alcohol. 1982 Mar;43(3):240-51 [PMID: 7120995]
  9. Psychol Med. 1982 Nov;12(4):855-70 [PMID: 7156256]
  10. Med Care. 2012 Feb;50(2):179-87 [PMID: 20881876]
  11. Behav Res Ther. 1979;17(2):157-60 [PMID: 426744]
  12. Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Oct;51(471):822-7 [PMID: 11677706]
  13. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Jan;11(1):218-48 [PMID: 24366045]
  14. Am J Prev Med. 2008 Nov;35(5 Suppl):S373-80 [PMID: 18929984]
  15. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(2):CD004148 [PMID: 17443541]
  16. Subst Abus. 2000 Mar;21(1):21-31 [PMID: 12466645]
  17. Prev Med. 2004 Apr;38(4):473-8 [PMID: 15020181]
  18. Addict Behav. 1986;11(2):149-61 [PMID: 3739800]
  19. J Stud Alcohol. 2005 May;66(3):361-8 [PMID: 16047525]
  20. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2008 Oct;35(3):294-303 [PMID: 18329222]
  21. Fam Pract. 1999 Dec;16(6):551-7 [PMID: 10625125]
  22. Br J Addict. 1992 May;87(5):743-54 [PMID: 1591525]
  23. Fam Pract. 2012 Apr;29(2):213-22 [PMID: 21987374]
  24. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2002 Mar 1;66(1):39-43 [PMID: 11850134]
  25. BMJ. 2002 Oct 19;325(7369):870 [PMID: 12386040]
  26. Addiction. 2008 Aug;103(8):1271-80 [PMID: 18422825]
  27. J Stud Alcohol. 2005 May;66(3):379-88 [PMID: 16047527]
  28. Arch Intern Med. 2005 May 9;165(9):986-95 [PMID: 15883236]
  29. J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Sep;21(9):966-72 [PMID: 16918743]
  30. J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Aug;22(8):1144-9 [PMID: 17541671]
  31. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Aug 6;159(3):210-8 [PMID: 23698791]
  32. Addict Behav. 2007 Jul;32(7):1321-30 [PMID: 17098368]
  33. Br J Addict. 1988 Apr;83(4):393-402 [PMID: 3395719]
  34. Subst Use Misuse. 2010 May;45(6):936-50 [PMID: 20397878]
  35. Am J Public Health. 2003 Apr;93(4):635-41 [PMID: 12660210]
  36. J Prim Care Community Health. 2014 Jan 1;5(1):50-4 [PMID: 24327588]
  37. Br J Addict. 1989 Jul;84(7):801-14 [PMID: 2758153]
  38. Alcohol Alcohol. 2008 Jan-Feb;43(1):62-9 [PMID: 17942439]
  39. Fam Pract. 2003 Jun;20(3):270-5 [PMID: 12738695]
  40. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2007 Jul-Aug;16(6):859-68 [PMID: 17678456]
  41. J Fam Pract. 1999 May;48(5):356-63 [PMID: 10334612]
  42. Subst Use Misuse. 2009;44(6):775-93 [PMID: 19444721]
  43. Addiction. 1993 Dec;88(12):1667-77 [PMID: 8130706]
  44. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2008 Mar;69(2):251-8 [PMID: 18299766]
  45. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2003 Jan 24;69(1):9-14 [PMID: 12536061]
  46. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1983 Jun;51(3):390-5 [PMID: 6863699]
  47. J Gerontol Soc Work. 2011 Apr;54(3):276-91 [PMID: 21462059]
  48. Am J Prev Med. 2002 May;22(4):320-3 [PMID: 11988386]
  49. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1985;11(1-2):131-49 [PMID: 4061431]
  50. Addict Behav. 1982;7(2):123-32 [PMID: 7102443]

Grants

  1. R01 AA014270/NIAAA NIH HHS
  2. R01 AA018658/NIAAA NIH HHS
  3. R01 AA011954/NIAAA NIH HHS
  4. R01AA018658/NIAAA NIH HHS
  5. R21 AA015777/NIAAA NIH HHS
  6. R01AA11954/NIAAA NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adult
Alcohol Drinking
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Primary Health Care
Psychotherapy, Brief
Self Care
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0BIpatientsvsreportedP = 0PCdrinkingalcoholprovider-initiatedself-initiatorsgreatereffortsincreaseinitiatealcohol-relateddiscussionsinitiatingproviderinitiatedreadinesschangehistoryconsumptionDrinkingdiscussionsignificantly7years1likelycurrent23perweek0002reductionsBACKGROUND:AlcoholbriefinterventionprimarycareeffectiveremainsunderutilizeddespitemultiplealternativeapproachpromotepromptLittleknownroledeliveryOBJECTIVES:determinecharacteristicsprovidersevaluateassociationinitiatorpatientMETHODS:contextclinicaltrialn = 267receivedvisitmannerdemographicsrecentassessed6-monthsRESULTS:FiftypercentreceivingComparedyounger434703meetDiagnosticStatisticalManualMentalDisordersDSMcriteriamajordepression24%14%04reportwithdrawalsymptoms68%52%P < 001BaselinebaselineratesDSM-IVdependencedifferentgroupsweeksdecreasesdrinks5402days6-monthfollow-upshowedweeklycomparedwhoseCONCLUSIONS:Patient-occurredequalfrequencypatient-initiatedBIsassociateduseFuturerateincludefocuspromptingBriefInterventionHeavyPrimaryCare:RolePatientInitiation

Similar Articles

Cited By