The Comet Assay and its applications in the field of ecotoxicology: a mature tool that continues to expand its perspectives.

Joaquín de Lapuente, Joana Lourenço, Sónia A Mendo, Miquel Borràs, Marta G Martins, Pedro M Costa, Mário Pacheco
Author Information
  1. Joaquín de Lapuente: Unit of Experimental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (UTOX-CERETOX), Barcelona Science Park Barcelona, Spain.
  2. Joana Lourenço: Department of Biology & CESAM, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago . Aveiro, Portugal.
  3. Sónia A Mendo: Department of Biology & CESAM, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago . Aveiro, Portugal.
  4. Miquel Borràs: Unit of Experimental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (UTOX-CERETOX), Barcelona Science Park Barcelona, Spain.
  5. Marta G Martins: Departamento de Ciências e Engenharia do Ambiente, MARE - Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia da Universidade Nova de Lisboa Caparica, Portugal.
  6. Pedro M Costa: Departamento de Ciências e Engenharia do Ambiente, MARE - Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia da Universidade Nova de Lisboa Caparica, Portugal.
  7. Mário Pacheco: Department of Biology & CESAM, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago . Aveiro, Portugal.

Abstract

Since Singh and colleagues, in 1988, launched to the scientific community the alkaline Single Cell Gel Electrophoresis (SCGE) protocol, or Comet Assay, its uses and applications has been increasing. The thematic areas of its current employment in the evaluation of genetic toxicity are vast, either in vitro or in vivo, both in the laboratory and in the environment, terrestrial or aquatic. It has been applied to a wide range of experimental models: bacteria, fungi, cells culture, arthropods, fishes, amphibians, reptiles, mammals, and humans. This document is intended to be a comprehensive review of what has been published to date on the field of ecotoxicology, aiming at the following main aspects: (i) to show the most relevant experimental models used as bioindicators both in the laboratory and in the field. Fishes are clearly the most adopted group, reflecting their popularity as bioindicator models, as well as a primary concern over the aquatic environment health. Amphibians are among the most sensitive organisms to environmental changes, mainly due to an early aquatic-dependent development stage and a highly permeable skin. Moreover, in the terrestrial approach, earthworms, plants or mammalians are excellent organisms to be used as experimental models for genotoxic evaluation of pollutants, complex mix of pollutants and chemicals, in both laboratory and natural environment. (ii) To review the development and modifications of the protocols used and the cell types (or tissues) used. The most recent developments concern the adoption of the enzyme linked assay (digestion with lesion-specific repair endonucleases) and prediction of the ability to repair of oxidative DNA damage, which is becoming a widespread approach, albeit challenging. For practical/technical reasons, blood is the most common choice but tissues/cells like gills, sperm cells, early larval stages, coelomocytes, liver or kidney have been also used. (iii) To highlight correlations with other biomarkers. (iv) To build a constructive criticism and summarize the needs for protocol improvements for future test applications within the field of ecotoxicology. The Comet Assay is still developing and its potential is yet underexploited in experimental models, mesocosmos or natural ecosystems.

Keywords

References

  1. Ecotoxicology. 2009 Jan;18(1):94-9 [PMID: 18766441]
  2. Genet Mol Biol. 2011 Oct;34(4):681-8 [PMID: 22215974]
  3. Environ Toxicol. 2015 Jul 8;30(8):918-26 [PMID: 24500942]
  4. Chem Res Toxicol. 2011 Jul 18;24(7):1040-7 [PMID: 21667992]
  5. Environ Pollut. 2011 Apr;159(4):841-9 [PMID: 21292364]
  6. Chemosphere. 2013 Jun;92(1):1-9 [PMID: 23557725]
  7. Aquat Toxicol. 2013 Oct 15;142-143:283-93 [PMID: 24077184]
  8. Mutagenesis. 2010 Sep;25(5):523-30 [PMID: 20643706]
  9. Mutat Res. 1998 Mar 20;399(2):135-47 [PMID: 9672656]
  10. Chemosphere. 2004 Aug;56(5):457-63 [PMID: 15212911]
  11. Chemosphere. 2010 Nov;81(10):1253-62 [PMID: 20884039]
  12. Aquat Toxicol. 2004 May 28;68(1):27-37 [PMID: 15110467]
  13. Environ Pollut. 2012 Feb;161:107-20 [PMID: 22230075]
  14. Mutat Res. 1994 Oct 16;310(2):175-85 [PMID: 7523890]
  15. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2007 Jul;67(3):361-8 [PMID: 17173970]
  16. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2014 Apr;161:41-52 [PMID: 24524868]
  17. Mutat Res. 2003 Jan 10;534(1-2):165-72 [PMID: 12504765]
  18. Reprod Toxicol. 2013 Apr;36:6-11 [PMID: 23178896]
  19. J Environ Biol. 2012 Jul;33(4):699-703 [PMID: 23359994]
  20. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol. 2010 Mar;61(1):29-36 [PMID: 20338865]
  21. Mar Environ Res. 2013 Mar;84:51-9 [PMID: 23294529]
  22. Mutat Res. 2013 Jun 14;754(1-2):22-31 [PMID: 23591161]
  23. Mutat Res. 2007 May 18;629(2):81-8 [PMID: 17344091]
  24. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2010 Oct;73(7):1530-6 [PMID: 20696478]
  25. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2013 Jul;36(1):194-201 [PMID: 23619523]
  26. Sci Total Environ. 2006 Feb 15;355(1-3):232-46 [PMID: 16442436]
  27. J Environ Monit. 2011 Sep;13(9):2559-67 [PMID: 21785796]
  28. Environ Mol Mutagen. 1999;34(4):246-55 [PMID: 10618172]
  29. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2006 Oct;47(8):616-23 [PMID: 16878316]
  30. Lab Anim. 1991 Jan;25(1):61-7 [PMID: 2010977]
  31. Ecotoxicology. 2013 Jul;22(5):825-37 [PMID: 23483329]
  32. Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Apr 1;45(7):2634-40 [PMID: 21401085]
  33. Aquat Toxicol. 2004 May 28;68(1):13-26 [PMID: 15110466]
  34. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2010 May 3;99(2):93-9 [PMID: 20338776]
  35. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2010 Apr;151(3):271-7 [PMID: 19941973]
  36. Drug Chem Toxicol. 2014 Oct;37(4):466-71 [PMID: 24524247]
  37. Mutat Res. 1994 Oct 16;310(2):169-73 [PMID: 7523889]
  38. Mutat Res. 1999 Dec 13;446(2):181-8 [PMID: 10635340]
  39. Drug Chem Toxicol. 2013 Oct;36(4):451-60 [PMID: 23534497]
  40. Mutagenesis. 2001 May;16(3):219-23 [PMID: 11320147]
  41. Folia Histochem Cytobiol. 2001;39 Suppl 2:52-3 [PMID: 11820626]
  42. DNA Repair (Amst). 2013 Nov;12(11):1007-10 [PMID: 24054700]
  43. Mutat Res. 2012 Mar 18;743(1-2):1-9 [PMID: 22266476]
  44. Mutat Res. 2003 Jan 10;534(1-2):21-32 [PMID: 12504752]
  45. Aquat Toxicol. 2005 Jun 15;73(2):128-38 [PMID: 15885821]
  46. Arch Toxicol. 2013 Jun;87(6):949-68 [PMID: 23685795]
  47. Biomark Insights. 2013 Apr 25;8:43-51 [PMID: 23700361]
  48. Mar Environ Res. 2004 May;57(4):295-310 [PMID: 14749061]
  49. Environ Mol Mutagen. 1997;29(4):418-30 [PMID: 9212794]
  50. PLoS One. 2014 Feb 04;9(2):e87789 [PMID: 24504252]
  51. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1995 Jan;54(1):112-9 [PMID: 7756773]
  52. Environ Pollut. 2008 Jun;153(3):590-3 [PMID: 17949869]
  53. Ecotoxicology. 2010 Nov;19(8):1551-9 [PMID: 20838886]
  54. Environ Mol Mutagen. 1996;28(2):112-20 [PMID: 8844992]
  55. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2014 Feb;100:7-14 [PMID: 24433785]
  56. Aquat Toxicol. 2006 Jun 10;78(1):21-6 [PMID: 16513190]
  57. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2010 May;58(4):1023-31 [PMID: 20012274]
  58. Environ Mol Mutagen. 1998;31(4):374-82 [PMID: 9654247]
  59. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2013 Jun;92:18-26 [PMID: 23490194]
  60. Environ Mol Mutagen. 1995;26(4):345-56 [PMID: 8575424]
  61. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2005 May 28;68(10):811-32 [PMID: 16020178]
  62. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2013 Dec;98:119-27 [PMID: 24103773]
  63. Mutat Res. 2004 Mar 14;558(1-2):27-34 [PMID: 15036116]
  64. Chemosphere. 2001 Jul;44(3):383-92 [PMID: 11459143]
  65. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2006 Oct;25(10):2794-803 [PMID: 17022423]
  66. Aquat Toxicol. 2012 Oct 15;122-123:67-74 [PMID: 22728207]
  67. Ecotoxicology. 2005 Apr;14(3):323-35 [PMID: 15943108]
  68. Mutat Res. 2009 Jan-Feb;681(1):80-92 [PMID: 18439870]
  69. Toxicol In Vitro. 2012 Apr;26(3):500-10 [PMID: 22281180]
  70. Ecotoxicology. 2012 Jul;21(5):1381-90 [PMID: 22526921]
  71. Toxicol In Vitro. 2003 Oct-Dec;17(5-6):603-7 [PMID: 14599451]
  72. Aquat Toxicol. 2011 Jan 25;101(2):405-11 [PMID: 21216351]
  73. Ecotoxicology. 2013 Sep;22(7):1111-22 [PMID: 23836361]
  74. Environ Toxicol. 2015 Jul;30(7):735-45 [PMID: 24459015]
  75. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2013 Aug 5;125:51-5 [PMID: 23742810]
  76. Mutagenesis. 2008 May;23(3):207-21 [PMID: 18381356]
  77. Ecotoxicology. 2010 Oct;19(7):1238-48 [PMID: 20563841]
  78. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2006 Sep;65(1):56-61 [PMID: 16095691]
  79. Zoo Biol. 2013 Jul-Aug;32(4):400-6 [PMID: 23609917]
  80. Mutat Res. 1998 Mar 30;413(3):235-50 [PMID: 9651536]
  81. Mutat Res. 1998 Jul 31;415(3):167-84 [PMID: 9714792]
  82. Mutat Res. 2013 May 15;753(2):107-13 [PMID: 23506740]
  83. Fish Physiol Biochem. 2010 Sep;36(3):605-626 [PMID: 19609701]
  84. Altern Lab Anim. 2005 Jul;33 Suppl 1:117-30 [PMID: 16194145]
  85. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2013 Jun;54(5):362-73 [PMID: 23625742]
  86. Environ Mol Mutagen. 1997;29(3):277-88 [PMID: 9142171]
  87. Folia Biol (Praha). 1996;42(1-2):17-21 [PMID: 8831022]
  88. PLoS One. 2014 Jan 27;9(1):e87337 [PMID: 24475276]
  89. Mar Pollut Bull. 2007 Jun;54(6):726-32 [PMID: 17328928]
  90. Mutat Res. 1998 Jun 5;401(1-2):143-52 [PMID: 9639693]
  91. Mar Environ Res. 2002 Sep-Dec;54(3-5):499-503 [PMID: 12408608]
  92. Ecotoxicology. 2011 Aug;20(6):1455-66 [PMID: 21656038]
  93. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2011;74(15-16):1067-75 [PMID: 21707430]
  94. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2011;74(15-16):1020-9 [PMID: 21707426]
  95. Sci Total Environ. 2010 Apr 1;408(9):2136-45 [PMID: 20083295]
  96. Environ Res. 2003 Jan;91(1):54-61 [PMID: 12550088]
  97. Mutagenesis. 2004 May;19(3):165-8 [PMID: 15123781]
  98. Radiats Biol Radioecol. 2012 Mar-Apr;52(2):198-206 [PMID: 22690583]
  99. Exp Cell Res. 1988 Mar;175(1):184-91 [PMID: 3345800]
  100. Carcinogenesis. 1993 Sep;14(9):1733-5 [PMID: 8403192]
  101. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2010 Jun;29(6):1358-66 [PMID: 20821580]
  102. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2010 Oct;73(7):1543-7 [PMID: 20719386]
  103. Mutat Res. 2013 Jan 20;750(1-2):86-91 [PMID: 23098860]
  104. Mutat Res. 2009 Nov-Dec;680(1-2):2-6 [PMID: 19524702]
  105. Environ Toxicol. 2005 Feb;20(1):74-84 [PMID: 15712291]
  106. Mutat Res. 1999 May 19;426(2):99-102 [PMID: 10350578]
  107. Mutat Res. 2011 Aug 16;723(2):152-7 [PMID: 21621635]
  108. Aquat Toxicol. 2013 Oct 15;142-143:85-95 [PMID: 23969285]
  109. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2001;38(4):316-22 [PMID: 11774363]
  110. Mutat Res. 2004 Aug 18;552(1-2):197-207 [PMID: 15288552]
  111. Toxicon. 2013 May;66:25-30 [PMID: 23402841]
  112. Mutat Res. 2007 Jun 15;630(1-2):42-9 [PMID: 17419090]
  113. Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2015 Feb;118:38-42 [PMID: 25752428]
  114. Mutagenesis. 2001 Jul;16(4):297-301 [PMID: 11420396]
  115. Mar Biotechnol (NY). 2001 Jun;3(Supplement 1):S50-60 [PMID: 14961300]
  116. Ecotoxicology. 2008 May;17(4):280-6 [PMID: 18297398]
  117. Reproduction. 2010 Jun;139(6):989-97 [PMID: 20357047]
  118. PLoS One. 2014 Jan 27;9(1):e87582 [PMID: 24475312]
  119. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2012 May;79:247-255 [PMID: 22280972]
  120. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2013 Feb;20(2):738-48 [PMID: 23138562]
  121. J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol. 2007 Feb 1;307(2):84-90 [PMID: 17171708]
  122. Ecotoxicology. 2011 Mar;20(2):377-84 [PMID: 21210217]
  123. Environ Toxicol. 2006 Jun;21(3):264-77 [PMID: 16646022]
  124. Rev Environ Health. 2005 Jan-Mar;20(1):1-13 [PMID: 15835495]
  125. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2012 Nov;85:96-103 [PMID: 22938960]
  126. Mutat Res. 1999 May 19;426(2):103-6 [PMID: 10350579]
  127. Mutat Res. 2003 Sep;544(1):43-64 [PMID: 12888107]
  128. Mutat Res. 2012 Jan 24;741(1-2):1-6 [PMID: 22009068]
  129. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2013 Jun;90(6):660-5 [PMID: 23563591]
  130. Genet Mol Biol. 2009 Jan;32(1):138-43 [PMID: 21637659]
  131. Mutat Res. 2000 Oct 10;470(1):39-51 [PMID: 10986474]
  132. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2010 Aug;59(2):182-93 [PMID: 20098983]
  133. Sci Total Environ. 2013 Jan 15;443:673-80 [PMID: 23220759]
  134. Toxicol In Vitro. 2011 Aug;25(5):1097-105 [PMID: 21419840]
  135. Mutagenesis. 2004 Jan;19(1):61-5 [PMID: 14681314]
  136. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2012 Dec;86:168-75 [PMID: 23025894]
  137. J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng. 2010;45(1):49-55 [PMID: 20390841]
  138. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2013 Apr;54(3):204-12 [PMID: 23444166]
  139. J Hazard Mater. 2014 May 30;273:239-46 [PMID: 24751489]
  140. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2010 Oct;73(7):1525-9 [PMID: 20684845]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0usedCometAssayexperimentalfieldmodelsapplicationslaboratoryenvironmentecotoxicologyprotocolevaluationterrestrialaquaticcellsamphibiansreviewconcernorganismsearlydevelopmentapproachearthwormsplantspollutantsnaturalrepairSinceSinghcolleagues1988launchedscientificcommunityalkalineSingleCellGelElectrophoresisSCGEusesincreasingthematicareascurrentemploymentgenetictoxicityvasteithervitrovivoappliedwiderangemodels:bacteriafungiculturearthropodsfishesreptilesmammalshumansdocumentintendedcomprehensivepublisheddateaimingfollowingmainaspects:showrelevantbioindicatorsFishesclearlyadoptedgroupreflectingpopularitybioindicatorwellprimaryhealthAmphibiansamongsensitiveenvironmentalchangesmainlydueaquatic-dependentstagehighlypermeableskinMoreovermammaliansexcellentgenotoxiccomplexmixchemicalsiimodificationsprotocolscelltypestissuesrecentdevelopmentsadoptionenzymelinkedassaydigestionlesion-specificendonucleasespredictionabilityoxidativeDNAdamagebecomingwidespreadalbeitchallengingpractical/technicalreasonsbloodcommonchoicetissues/cellslikegillsspermlarvalstagescoelomocytesliverkidneyalsoiiihighlightcorrelationsbiomarkersivbuildconstructivecriticismsummarizeneedsimprovementsfuturetestwithinstilldevelopingpotentialyetunderexploitedmesocosmosecosystemsecotoxicology:maturetoolcontinuesexpandperspectivesmolluskspiscinemodel

Similar Articles

Cited By