Attenuated infrared neuron stimulation response in cochlea of deaf animals may associate with the degeneration of spiral ganglion neurons.

Bingbin Xie, Chunfu Dai, Huawei Li
Author Information
  1. Bingbin Xie: Department of Otology and Skull Base Surgery, Hearing Research Key Lab of Health Ministry of China, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200031, China.
  2. Chunfu Dai: Department of Otology and Skull Base Surgery, Hearing Research Key Lab of Health Ministry of China, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200031, China ; cfdai66@163.com.
  3. Huawei Li: Department of Otology and Skull Base Surgery, Hearing Research Key Lab of Health Ministry of China, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200031, China ; Hwli@shmu.edu.cn.

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesize that degenerated spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs) in guinea pigs reduces auditory brainstem responses evoked by pulsed infrared stimulation.
BACKGROUND: Pulsed infrared laser excitation can directly evoke physiological responses in neuronal and other excitable cells in vivo and in vitro. Laser pulses could benefit patients with cochlear implants to stimulate the auditory system.
METHODS: Pulsed infrared lasers were used to study evoked optical auditory brainstem responses (oABRs) in normal hearing and deafened animals. Aslo, the morphology and anatomy of SGNs in normal hearing and deafened guinea pigs were compared.
RESULTS: By recording oABRs evoked by varying infrared laser pulse durations, it is suggested that degeneration of SGNs in deafened guinea pigs was associated with an elevated oABR threshold and with lower amplitudes. Moreover, oABR threshold decreased while amplitudes increased in both normal hearing and deafened animals as the pulse duration prolonged. Electron microscopy revealed that SGNs in deafened guinea pigs had swollen and vacuolar mitochondria, as well as demyelinated soma and axons.
CONCLUSION: Infrared laser pulses can stimulate SGNs to evoke oABRs in guinea pigs. Deafened guinea pigs have elevated thresholds and smaller amplitude responses, likely a result of degenerated SGNs. Short pulse durations are more suitable to evoke responses in both normal hearing and deafened animals.

Keywords

References

  1. Brain Res. 2004 Jan 30;997(1):40-51 [PMID: 14715148]
  2. Hear Res. 2007 Sep;231(1-2):1-12 [PMID: 17475424]
  3. Lasers Surg Med. 2006 Sep;38(8):745-53 [PMID: 16871623]
  4. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2007 Jun;54(6 Pt 1):1108-14 [PMID: 17554829]
  5. Laryngoscope. 2010 Oct;120(10):2071-82 [PMID: 20830761]
  6. Hear Res. 2014 Apr;310:69-75 [PMID: 24508368]
  7. Biophys J. 2008 Apr 15;94(8):3159-66 [PMID: 18192375]
  8. Laser Photon Rev. 2011 Jan 1;5(1):68-80 [PMID: 23082105]
  9. Hear Res. 2004 Nov;197(1-2):1-10 [PMID: 15504598]
  10. Hear Res. 1999 Jul;133(1-2):27-39 [PMID: 10416862]
  11. Audiol Neurootol. 2012;17(6):357-72 [PMID: 22907151]
  12. Lasers Surg Med. 1994;15(3):295-305 [PMID: 7830476]
  13. Hear Res. 1998 Jul;121(1-2):11-28 [PMID: 9682804]
  14. J Neurosci Methods. 2009 May 15;179(2):201-7 [PMID: 19428528]
  15. Hear Res. 2008 Oct;244(1-2):25-34 [PMID: 18692557]
  16. Hear Res. 2007 Mar;225(1-2):60-70 [PMID: 17258411]
  17. Hear Res. 2011 Dec;282(1-2):289-302 [PMID: 21763410]
  18. Biomed Opt Express. 2012 Dec 1;3(12):3332-45 [PMID: 23243582]
  19. J Physiol. 2011 Mar 15;589(Pt 6):1283-94 [PMID: 21242259]
  20. Hear Res. 2005 Apr;202(1-2):74-86 [PMID: 15811701]
  21. Nat Photonics. 2010 Aug 15;4:623-626 [PMID: 21423854]
  22. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2012 Nov;295(11):1987-99 [PMID: 23044730]
  23. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2011 Jun;58(6):1648-55 [PMID: 21278011]
  24. J Biomed Opt. 2007 Mar-Apr;12(2):021008 [PMID: 17477715]
  25. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58189 [PMID: 23505466]
  26. Hear Res. 2008 Aug;242(1-2):42-51 [PMID: 18321670]
  27. Biophys J. 2007 Oct 1;93(7):2567-80 [PMID: 17526565]
  28. Hear Res. 2010 Oct 1;269(1-2):102-11 [PMID: 20603207]
  29. Nat Commun. 2012 Mar 13;3:736 [PMID: 22415827]
  30. Hear Res. 2008 Aug;242(1-2):164-71 [PMID: 18164883]
  31. Hear Res. 2014 May;311:72-88 [PMID: 24709273]
  32. Laryngoscope. 2007 Sep;117(9):1641-7 [PMID: 17607145]
  33. Opt Lett. 2005 Mar 1;30(5):504-6 [PMID: 15789717]
  34. Lasers Med Sci. 2014 Jan;29(1):343-9 [PMID: 23712393]
  35. J Neurosci Res. 2003 Mar 15;71(6):785-90 [PMID: 12605404]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0SGNsguineapigsdeafenedresponsesinfraredlasernormalhearinganimalsauditoryevokedevokeoABRspulsedegeneratedspiralganglionneuronsbrainstempulsedstimulationPulsedcanpulsesstimulatedurationsdegenerationelevatedoABRthresholdamplitudes140Lasers170HYPOTHESIS:hypothesizereducesBACKGROUND:excitationdirectlyphysiologicalneuronalexcitablecellsvivovitroLaserbenefitpatientscochlearimplantssystemMETHODS:lasersusedstudyopticalAslomorphologyanatomycomparedRESULTS:recordingvaryingsuggestedassociatedlowerMoreoverdecreasedincreaseddurationprolongedElectronmicroscopyrevealedswollenvacuolarmitochondriawelldemyelinatedsomaaxonsCONCLUSION:InfraredDeafenedthresholdssmalleramplitudelikelyresultShortsuitableAttenuatedneuronresponsecochleadeafmayassociate0140optics35384940Otolaryngology5380Physiology

Similar Articles

Cited By