Adherence to Two Methods of Education and Metabolic Control in Type 2 Diabetics.

Verónica R Gutiérrez Herrera, Hugo Mendieta Zerón, Martha R Mendieta Alcántara
Author Information
  1. Verónica R Gutiérrez Herrera: Faculty of Medicine, Autonomous University of the State of Mexico (UAEMex).
  2. Hugo Mendieta Zerón: Asociación Científica Latina A.C. (ASCILA) and Ciprés Grupo Médico (CGM).
  3. Martha R Mendieta Alcántara: Diabetes Clinic, Regional Hospital "Gral. Ignacio Zaragoza", ISSSTE.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Education in diabetes optimizes metabolic control, prevents acute and chronic complications, and improves quality of life. Our main objective was to evaluate if a better metabolic control is achieved in diabetic patients undergoing a program of intensive interactive care than in those with traditional care and written information.
METHODS: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), aged 20-60 years, education level at least of primary school, serum creatinine ≤ 2.5 mg/dl, self-sufficient and HbA1c ≥ 7.1% were allocated in two groups of education, 1) minimal education (MEG) and 2) full education (FEG). The MEG patients followed predefined diet; FEG patients chose the diet by selecting foods from each group in a list of matches, teaching them to count nutrients, kilocalories (kcal) and percentage of nutrients.
RESULTS: A follow-up of 31 patients in each group was obtained. The proportion of patients who had initial adherence was 13.33% in the MEG group and 9.67% in the FEG group while, at the end of the study, these percentages were of 73.3% and 58.38% respectively. The final HbA1c decreased in both groups, with or without good adherence. The FEG group had a higher decline in the values of cholesterol (p = 0.036) and LDL (p = 0.002) than the MEG group.
CONCLUSION: Education programs in T2DM contribute to a decrease in HbA1c within six months, but an intensive program is more effective in reducing cholesterol and LDL.

Keywords

References

  1. Diabetes Educ. 2014 Sep-Oct;40(5):638-47 [PMID: 24872385]
  2. Diabetes Care. 2001 Mar;24(3):561-87 [PMID: 11289485]
  3. Glob J Health Sci. 2014 Mar;6(2):221-6 [PMID: 24576384]
  4. Patient Educ Couns. 1992 Feb;19(1):61-74 [PMID: 1298950]
  5. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2012;771:42-50 [PMID: 23393670]
  6. Ceylon Med J. 1993 Mar;38(1):18-21 [PMID: 8477485]
  7. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2008 Jan;2(1):139-46 [PMID: 19885190]
  8. Am J Manag Care. 2013 Feb;19(2):104-12 [PMID: 23448107]
  9. Diabetes Educ. 2014 Mar-Apr;40(2):167-77 [PMID: 24470042]
  10. Patient Educ Couns. 1997 Nov;32(3):175-84 [PMID: 9423499]
  11. Diabetes Care. 1999 Mar;22(3):403-8 [PMID: 10097918]
  12. Diabetes Care. 2013 Feb;36(2):463-70 [PMID: 23349150]
  13. Diabetes Educ. 2012 Jan-Feb;38(1):108-23 [PMID: 22116473]
  14. Diabetes Educ. 2012 Sep-Oct;38(5):723-32 [PMID: 22968219]
  15. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2012;4:57-65 [PMID: 22427724]
  16. J Am Diet Assoc. 1989 Mar;89(3):354-8 [PMID: 2921441]
  17. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014 Jun;16(6):358-62 [PMID: 24580377]
  18. Diabet Med. 1999 Sep;16(9):716-30 [PMID: 10510947]
  19. Am Fam Physician. 2003 Oct 15;68(8):1569-74 [PMID: 14596445]
  20. Diabet Med. 1991 Feb-Mar;8(2):111-7 [PMID: 1827394]
  21. Diabetes Educ. 2014 Jul;40(4):476-487 [PMID: 24737885]
  22. Diabetes Care. 1985 Nov-Dec;8(6):537-44 [PMID: 3908024]
  23. Diabetes Care. 1995 Aug;18(8):1204-14 [PMID: 7587866]
  24. Nurs Health Sci. 2011 Sep;13(3):335-43 [PMID: 21812879]
  25. Patient Educ Couns. 1994 Apr;23(1):33-40 [PMID: 7971538]
  26. Diabetes Educ. 2008 Jul-Aug;34(4):698-706 [PMID: 18669812]
  27. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;(2):CD003417 [PMID: 15846663]
  28. Diabetologia. 2002 Sep;45(9):1231-9 [PMID: 12242455]

MeSH Term

Adult
Cholesterol
Creatinine
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Diet, Diabetic
Female
Glycated Hemoglobin
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Compliance
Patient Education as Topic
Self Care

Chemicals

Glycated Hemoglobin A
hemoglobin A1c protein, human
Cholesterol
Creatinine

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0grouppatientseducation2MEGFEGEducationdiabetesmetaboliccontrolHbA1cprogramintensivecaremellitusT2DMgroupsdietnutrientsadherencecholesterolp=0LDLBACKGROUND:optimizespreventsacutechroniccomplicationsimprovesqualitylifemainobjectiveevaluatebetterachieveddiabeticundergoinginteractivetraditionalwritteninformationMETHODS:Patientstypeaged20-60yearslevelleastprimaryschoolserumcreatinine5mg/dlself-sufficient71%allocatedtwo1minimalfullfollowedpredefinedchoseselectingfoodslistmatchesteachingcountkilocalorieskcalpercentageRESULTS:follow-up31obtainedproportioninitial1333%967%endstudypercentages733%5838%respectivelyfinaldecreasedwithoutgoodhigherdeclinevalues036002CONCLUSION:programscontributedecreasewithinsixmonthseffectivereducingAdherenceTwoMethodsMetabolicControlTypeDiabetics

Similar Articles

Cited By