Do Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccines Represent Good Value for Money in a Lower-Middle Income Country? A Cost-Utility Analysis in the Philippines.

Manuel Alexander Haasis, Joyce Anne Ceria, Wantanee Kulpeng, Yot Teerawattananon, Marissa Alejandria
Author Information
  1. Manuel Alexander Haasis: National Center for Pharmaceutical Access and Management (NCPAM), Department of Health, Manila, Philippines.
  2. Joyce Anne Ceria: National Center for Pharmaceutical Access and Management (NCPAM), Department of Health, Manila, Philippines.
  3. Wantanee Kulpeng: Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP), Department of Health, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
  4. Yot Teerawattananon: Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP), Department of Health, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
  5. Marissa Alejandria: Institute of Clinical Epidemiology-National Institutes of Health (NIH), University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to assess the value for money of introducing pneumococcal conjugate vaccines as part of the immunization program in a lower-middle income country, the Philippines, which is not eligible for GAVI support and lower vaccine prices. It also includes the newest clinical evidence evaluating the efficacy of PCV10, which is lacking in other previous studies.
METHODS: A cost-utility analysis was conducted. A Markov simulation model was constructed to examine the costs and consequences of PCV10 and PCV13 against the current scenario of no PCV vaccination for a lifetime horizon. A health system perspective was employed to explore different funding schemes, which include universal or partial vaccination coverage subsidized by the government. Results were presented as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) in Philippine peso (Php) per QALY gained (1 USD = 44.20 Php). Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed to determine the impact of parameter uncertainty.
RESULTS: With universal vaccination at a cost per dose of Php 624 for PCV10 and Php 700 for PCV13, both PCVs are cost-effective compared to no vaccination given the ceiling threshold of Php 120,000 per QALY gained, yielding ICERs of Php 68,182 and Php 54,510 for PCV10 and PCV13, respectively. Partial vaccination of 25% of the birth cohort resulted in significantly higher ICER values (Php 112,640 for PCV10 and Php 84,654 for PCV13) due to loss of herd protection. The budget impact analysis reveals that universal vaccination would cost Php 3.87 billion to 4.34 billion per annual, or 1.6 to 1.8 times the budget of the current national vaccination program.
CONCLUSION: The inclusion of PCV in the national immunization program is recommended. PCV13 achieved better value for money compared to PCV10. However, the affordability and sustainability of PCV implementation over the long-term should be considered by decision makers.

References

  1. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e39150 [PMID: 22815698]
  2. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2000 Mar;19(3):187-95 [PMID: 10749457]
  3. J Med Assoc Thai. 2010 Nov;93 Suppl 5:S6-12 [PMID: 21298830]
  4. Vaccine. 2011 Dec 6;29(52):9600-6 [PMID: 21933696]
  5. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2013 Oct;32(10):e383-9 [PMID: 23629024]
  6. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2007 Jun;26(6):468-72 [PMID: 17529860]
  7. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 Dec;12(6):488-94 [PMID: 15548905]
  8. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2002 Sep;21(9):810-5 [PMID: 12352800]
  9. N Engl J Med. 2001 Feb 8;344(6):403-9 [PMID: 11172176]
  10. Vaccine. 2013 Jun 10;31(26):2839-47 [PMID: 23588084]
  11. Vaccine. 2013 Oct 1;31(42):4881-7 [PMID: 23928466]
  12. Vaccine. 2010 Jun 7;28(25):4192-203 [PMID: 20417262]
  13. Scand J Infect Dis. 2005;37(11-12):821-32 [PMID: 16308215]
  14. PLoS Med. 2014 Jun 03;11(6):e1001657 [PMID: 24892763]
  15. Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Dec 15;59(12):1724-32 [PMID: 25159581]
  16. Lancet. 2006 Oct 28;368(9546):1495-502 [PMID: 17071283]
  17. Value Health. 2012 Jan-Feb;15(1 Suppl):S15-9 [PMID: 22265061]
  18. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009 Apr;28(4 Suppl):S66-76 [PMID: 19325449]
  19. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2013 Mar;32(3):203-7 [PMID: 23558320]
  20. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2010 Jun;17(6):1017-26 [PMID: 20427630]
  21. PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e36226 [PMID: 22558393]
  22. Vaccine. 2011 Sep 2;29(38):6686-94 [PMID: 21745516]
  23. Lancet. 2013 Jan 19;381(9862):214-22 [PMID: 23158882]
  24. Vaccine. 2012 Mar 2;30(11):1936-43 [PMID: 22266291]
  25. Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Mar 15;38(6):830-5 [PMID: 14999627]
  26. Vaccine. 2011 Nov 15;29(49):9127-31 [PMID: 21983361]
  27. Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Feb;9(1):7-15 [PMID: 17333089]
  28. N Engl J Med. 2003 May 1;348(18):1737-46 [PMID: 12724479]
  29. An Pediatr (Barc). 2014 Mar;80(3):173-80 [PMID: 23796611]
  30. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;(2):CD001480 [PMID: 19370566]
  31. Lancet Infect Dis. 2011 Oct;11(10):760-8 [PMID: 21621466]
  32. Biomed J. 2012 Nov-Dec;35(6):450-6 [PMID: 23442357]
  33. N Engl J Med. 2006 Apr 6;354(14):1522-4 [PMID: 16598050]
  34. Vaccine. 2011 Jul 12;29(31):4963-72 [PMID: 21621575]
  35. BMC Pediatr. 2013 Aug 13;13:122 [PMID: 23941314]
  36. Lancet. 2011 Dec 3;378(9807):1962-73 [PMID: 21492929]
  37. Vaccine. 2014 Jun 5;32(27):3452-9 [PMID: 24690148]
  38. Vaccine. 2004 Mar 12;22(9-10):1138-49 [PMID: 15003641]
  39. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010 Aug;83(2):301-6 [PMID: 20682872]
  40. Vaccine. 2010 Jul 26;28(33):5485-90 [PMID: 20554066]
  41. BMJ. 2010 Jun 02;340:c2509 [PMID: 20519267]

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Child
Child, Preschool
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Female
Financing, Government
Humans
Immunization Programs
Income
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Male
Markov Chains
Middle Aged
Philippines
Pneumococcal Vaccines
Pneumonia, Pneumococcal
Streptococcus pneumoniae
Vaccination
Vaccines, Conjugate

Chemicals

10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine
13-valent pneumococcal vaccine
Pneumococcal Vaccines
Vaccines, Conjugate

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0PhpvaccinationPCV10PCV13perprogramanalysisPCVuniversal1valuemoneyimmunizationPhilippinescurrentICERsQALYgainedimpactcostcomparedbudgetbillionnationalOBJECTIVES:objectivestudyassessintroducingpneumococcalconjugatevaccinespartlower-middleincomecountryeligibleGAVIsupportlowervaccinepricesalsoincludesnewestclinicalevidenceevaluatingefficacylackingpreviousstudiesMETHODS:cost-utilityconductedMarkovsimulationmodelconstructedexaminecostsconsequencesscenariolifetimehorizonhealthsystemperspectiveemployedexploredifferentfundingschemesincludepartialcoveragesubsidizedgovernmentResultspresentedincrementalcost-effectivenessratiosPhilippinepesoUSD=4420ProbabilisticsensitivityperformeddetermineparameteruncertaintyRESULTS:dose624700PCVscost-effectivegivenceilingthreshold120000yielding6818254510respectivelyPartial25%birthcohortresultedsignificantlyhigherICERvalues11264084654duelossherdprotectionreveals387434annual68timesCONCLUSION:inclusionrecommendedachievedbetterHoweveraffordabilitysustainabilityimplementationlong-termconsidereddecisionmakersPneumococcalConjugateVaccinesRepresentGoodValueMoneyLower-MiddleIncomeCountry?Cost-UtilityAnalysis

Similar Articles

Cited By