A target-controlled infusion system with bispectral index monitoring of propofol sedation during endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Atsushi Imagawa, Hidenori Hata, Morihito Nakatsu, Akihiro Matsumi, Eijiro Ueta, Kozue Suto, Hiroyuki Terasawa, Hiroyuki Sakae, Keiko Takeuchi, Manabu Fujihara, Hitomi Endo, Hisae Yasuhara, Shinichi Ishihara, Hiromitsu Kanzaki, Hideki Jinno, Hidenori Kamada, Eisuke Kaji, Akio Moriya, Masaharu Ando
Author Information
  1. Atsushi Imagawa: Department of Gastroenterology, Mitoyo General Hospital, Kagawa, Japan.
  2. Hidenori Hata: Department of Gastroenterology, Mitoyo General Hospital, Kagawa, Japan.
  3. Morihito Nakatsu: Department of Gastroenterology, Mitoyo General Hospital, Kagawa, Japan.
  4. Akihiro Matsumi: Department of Gastroenterology, Mitoyo General Hospital, Kagawa, Japan.
  5. Eijiro Ueta: Department of Gastroenterology, Mitoyo General Hospital, Kagawa, Japan.
  6. Kozue Suto: Department of Gastroenterology, Mitoyo General Hospital, Kagawa, Japan.
  7. Hiroyuki Terasawa: Department of Gastroenterology, Mitoyo General Hospital, Kagawa, Japan.
  8. Hiroyuki Sakae: Department of Gastroenterology, Mitoyo General Hospital, Kagawa, Japan.
  9. Keiko Takeuchi: Department of Gastroenterology, Mitoyo General Hospital, Kagawa, Japan.
  10. Manabu Fujihara: Department of Gastroenterology, Mitoyo General Hospital, Kagawa, Japan.
  11. Hitomi Endo: Department of Gastroenterology, Mitoyo General Hospital, Kagawa, Japan.
  12. Hisae Yasuhara: Department of Gastroenterology, Mitoyo General Hospital, Kagawa, Japan.
  13. Shinichi Ishihara: Department of Gastroenterology, Mitoyo General Hospital, Kagawa, Japan.
  14. Hiromitsu Kanzaki: Department of Gastroenterology, Mitoyo General Hospital, Kagawa, Japan.
  15. Hideki Jinno: Department of Gastroenterology, Mitoyo General Hospital, Kagawa, Japan.
  16. Hidenori Kamada: Department of Gastroenterology, Mitoyo General Hospital, Kagawa, Japan.
  17. Eisuke Kaji: Department of Gastroenterology, Mitoyo General Hospital, Kagawa, Japan.
  18. Akio Moriya: Department of Gastroenterology, Mitoyo General Hospital, Kagawa, Japan.
  19. Masaharu Ando: Department of Gastroenterology, Mitoyo General Hospital, Kagawa, Japan.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Propofol administration via a target-controlled infusion system with bispectral index monitoring (BIS/TCI system) is expected to prevent complications from sedation during complex and long endoscopic procedures. We evaluated the feasibility of setting the BIS/TCI system for non-anesthesiologist administration of propofol (NAAP) during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).
PATIENTS AND METHODS: From May 2009 to February 2013, 250 patients with esophagogastric neoplasms were treated with ESD using the BIS/TCI system with NAAP. In the TCI system, the initial target blood concentration of propofol was set at 1.2 μg/mL. The titration speed of propofol was adjusted according to the BIS score and the movement of the patient. The BIS target level ranged from moderate to deep sedation, at which a stable BIS score between 60 and 80 was obtained.
RESULTS: In 80.4 % of patients, it was possible to maintain stable sedation with a blood concentration of propofol of less than 1.6 µg/mL using TCI throughout the ESD procedure. The default setting for ideal blood concentration of propofol was 1.2 μg/mL, because the medians of the lower and upper bounds of blood concentration were 1.2 μg/mL (range 0.6 - 1.8 μg/mL) and 1.4 μg/mL (range 1.0 - 3.8 μg/mL), respectively. Although hypotension occurred in 27 patients (10.8 %), oxygen desaturation occurred in only nine patients (3.6 %), and severe desaturation in only two patients (0.8 %).
CONCLUSIONS: Using our settings, it is possible for a non-anesthesiologist to maintain stable sedation during a lengthy endoscopic procedure through propofol sedation with a BIS/TCI system.

References

  1. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53311 [PMID: 23308191]
  2. Endoscopy. 2006 Jul;38(7):684-9 [PMID: 16761209]
  3. Nihon Rinsho. 2011 Apr;69(4):684-90 [PMID: 21591423]
  4. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 May;101(5):967-74 [PMID: 16573781]
  5. Gastroenterology. 2002 Jul;123(1):8-16 [PMID: 12105827]
  6. Anesth Analg. 2009 Mar;108(3):828-34 [PMID: 19224790]
  7. J Clin Anesth. 2011 Dec;23(8):636-42 [PMID: 22137516]
  8. Endoscopy. 2006 Oct;38(10):987-90 [PMID: 17058162]
  9. World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jan 28;19(4):463-81 [PMID: 23382625]
  10. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2012 Sep;21(3):259-63 [PMID: 23012666]
  11. Endoscopy. 2013 Nov;45(11):915-9 [PMID: 24104763]
  12. Gastric Cancer. 2014 Oct;17(4):686-91 [PMID: 24399495]
  13. Endoscopy. 2010 Nov;42(11):960-74 [PMID: 21072716]
  14. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Sep;60(3):356-60 [PMID: 15332023]
  15. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Aug;107(8):1205-12 [PMID: 22641306]
  16. Dig Endosc. 2013 Mar;25 Suppl 1:13-9 [PMID: 23480399]
  17. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Mar;268(3):457-62 [PMID: 20811901]
  18. Endoscopy. 2013 Nov;45(11):907-14 [PMID: 24165817]
  19. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Sep;60(3):361-6 [PMID: 15332024]
  20. Endoscopy. 2008 Nov;40(11):905-9 [PMID: 19023932]
  21. Dig Endosc. 2014 Jul;26(4):515-24 [PMID: 24354404]
  22. Anesth Analg. 2002 May;94(5):1212-6, table of contents [PMID: 11973192]
  23. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 May;57(6):664-71 [PMID: 12709694]
  24. Endoscopy. 2014 Mar;46(3):236-44 [PMID: 24338242]
  25. Endoscopy. 2009 Dec;41(12):1046-51 [PMID: 19967620]
  26. Gastroenterology. 2009 Dec;137(6):2161-7 [PMID: 19961989]
  27. Endoscopy. 2013 Nov;45(11):869-75 [PMID: 23884795]
  28. Endoscopy. 2006 Apr;38(4):360-7 [PMID: 16680635]
  29. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001 Jul;54(1):14-7 [PMID: 11427835]
  30. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Nov;98(11):2440-7 [PMID: 14638346]
  31. Br J Anaesth. 1989 Jan;62(1):46-53 [PMID: 2783854]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0systempropofolsedation1patientsμg/mLBIS/TCIendoscopicbloodconcentrationESD2BISstableANDadministrationtarget-controlledinfusionbispectralindexmonitoringsettingnon-anesthesiologistNAAPsubmucosaldissectionusingTCItargetscore80possiblemaintainprocedurerange0occurred8 %desaturationBACKGROUNDSTUDYAIMS:PropofolviaexpectedpreventcomplicationscomplexlongproceduresevaluatedfeasibilityPATIENTSMETHODS:May2009February2013250esophagogastricneoplasmstreatedinitialsettitrationspeedadjustedaccordingmovementpatientlevelrangedmoderatedeep60obtainedRESULTS:4 %less6 µg/mLthroughoutdefaultidealmedianslowerupperbounds6 - 18 μg/mL40 - 38respectivelyAlthoughhypotension2710oxygennine36 %severetwoCONCLUSIONS:Usingsettingslengthy

Similar Articles

Cited By