United States multicenter clinical trial of the cochlear nucleus hybrid implant system.

J Thomas Roland, Bruce J Gantz, Susan B Waltzman, Aaron J Parkinson, Multicenter Clinical Trial Group
Author Information
  1. J Thomas Roland: Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, New York University, New York, New York.
  2. Bruce J Gantz: Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
  3. Susan B Waltzman: Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, New York University, New York, New York.
  4. Aaron J Parkinson: University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, U.S.A.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of acoustic and electric sound processing for individuals with significant residual low-frequency hearing and severe-to-profound high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, single-arm repeated measures, single-subject design.
METHODS: Fifty individuals, ≥ 18 years old, with low-frequency hearing and severe high-frequency loss were implanted with the Cochlear Nucleus Hybrid L24 implant at 10 investigational sites. Preoperatively, subjects demonstrated consonant-nucleus-consonant word scores of 10% through 60% in the ear to be implanted. Subjects were assessed prospectively, preoperatively, and postoperatively on coprimary endpoints of consonant-nucleus-consonant words, AzBio sentences in noise, and self-assessment measures.
RESULTS: Significant mean improvements were observed for coprimary endpoints: consonant-nucleus-consonant words (35.8 percentage points) and AzBio sentences in noise (32.0 percentage points), both at P < 0.001. Ninety-six percent of subjects performed equal or better on speech in quiet and 90% in noise. Eighty-two percent of subjects showed improved performance on speech in quiet and 74% in noise. Self-assessments were positive, corroborating speech perception results.
CONCLUSION: The Nucleus Hybrid System provides significant improvements in speech intelligibility in quiet and noise for individuals with severe high-frequency loss and some low-frequency hearing. This device expands indications to hearing-impaired individuals who perform poorly with amplification due to bilateral high-frequency hearing loss and who previously were not implant candidates.

Keywords

References

  1. Ear Hear. 2004 Apr;25(2):98-116 [PMID: 15064655]
  2. J Speech Hear Res. 1978 Sep;21(3):507-18 [PMID: 713519]
  3. J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Mar;113(3):1706-17 [PMID: 12656402]
  4. Ear Hear. 2001 Aug;22(4):268-78 [PMID: 11527034]
  5. Int J Audiol. 2004 Feb;43(2):85-99 [PMID: 15035561]
  6. J Speech Hear Disord. 1962 Feb;27:62-70 [PMID: 14485785]
  7. Laryngoscope. 2005 May;115(5):796-802 [PMID: 15867642]
  8. Audiol Neurootol. 2005 May-Jun;10(3):134-44 [PMID: 15724084]
  9. J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 Mar;119(3):1752-63 [PMID: 16583917]
  10. Audiol Neurootol. 2006;11 Suppl 1:2-5 [PMID: 17063003]
  11. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007 Aug;50(4):819-34 [PMID: 17675588]
  12. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007 Oct;50(5):1194-202 [PMID: 17905905]
  13. Ear Hear. 2011 Sep-Oct;32(5):543-55 [PMID: 21336138]
  14. Int J Audiol. 2013 Dec;52(12):838-48 [PMID: 23992489]
  15. Ear Hear. 2014 Jul-Aug;35(4):410-7 [PMID: 24950254]
  16. Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35:139-52 [PMID: 24641557]
  17. Ear Hear. 2012 Jan-Feb;33(1):112-7 [PMID: 21829134]
  18. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Feb 25;173(4):293-9 [PMID: 23337978]

Grants

  1. P50 DC000242/NIDCD NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cochlear Implants
Female
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Prosthesis Design
Quality of Life
Treatment Outcome
United States

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0hearingnoiseimplantindividualshigh-frequencylossspeechlow-frequencysubjectsconsonant-nucleus-consonantquietsignificantmeasuressevereimplantedCochlearNucleusHybridcoprimarywordsAzBiosentencesimprovementspercentagepoints0percentcochlearhybridstimulationOBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS:evaluatesafetyefficacyacousticelectricsoundprocessingresidualsevere-to-profoundsensorineuralSTUDYDESIGN:Prospectivesingle-armrepeatedsingle-subjectdesignMETHODS:Fifty18yearsoldL2410investigationalsitesPreoperativelydemonstratedwordscores10%60%earSubjectsassessedprospectivelypreoperativelypostoperativelyendpointsself-assessmentRESULTS:Significantmeanobservedendpoints:35832P<001Ninety-sixperformedequalbetter90%Eighty-twoshowedimprovedperformance74%Self-assessmentspositivecorroboratingperceptionresultsCONCLUSION:Systemprovidesintelligibilitydeviceexpandsindicationshearing-impairedperformpoorlyamplificationduebilateralpreviouslycandidatesUnitedStatesmulticenterclinicaltrialnucleussystembimodalelectric-acousticpreservation

Similar Articles

Cited By