The effect of low-dose dexmedetomidine on hemodynamics and anesthetic requirement during bis-spectral index-guided total intravenous anesthesia.

Hee Yeon Park, Jong Yeop Kim, Sang Hyun Cho, Dongchul Lee, Hyun Jeong Kwak
Author Information
  1. Hee Yeon Park: Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gachon University, Gil Medical Center, 1198 Guwol-dong, Namdong-gu, Incheon, 405-760, Republic of Korea.
  2. Jong Yeop Kim: Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, San 5, Wonchon-dong, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon, 443-721, Republic of Korea.
  3. Sang Hyun Cho: Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, San 5, Wonchon-dong, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon, 443-721, Republic of Korea.
  4. Dongchul Lee: Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gachon University, Gil Medical Center, 1198 Guwol-dong, Namdong-gu, Incheon, 405-760, Republic of Korea.
  5. Hyun Jeong Kwak: Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gachon University, Gil Medical Center, 1198 Guwol-dong, Namdong-gu, Incheon, 405-760, Republic of Korea. hyun615@gilhospital.com.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of low-dose dexmedetomidine on hemodynamics and anesthetic requirements during propofol and remifentanil anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Thirty adult patients were randomly allocated to receive dexmedetomidine infusion of 0.3 μg/kg/h (dexmedetomidine group, n = 15) or comparable volumes of saline infusion (control group, n = 15). Target controlled infusion of propofol and remifentanil was used for anesthetic induction and maintenance, and adjusted in order to maintain a bispectral index of 40-55 and hemodynamic stability. We measured hemodynamics and recorded total and mean infused dosages of propofol and remifentanil. For anesthesia induction and maintenance, mean infused doses of propofol (121 ± 27 vs. 144 ± 29 μg/kg/min, P = 0.04) and remifentanil (118 ± 27 vs. 150 ± 36 ng/kg/min, P = 0.01) were lower in the dexmedetomidine group than in the control group, respectively. The dexmedetomidine group required 16 % less propofol and 23 % less remifentanil. During anesthetic induction and maintenance, the dexmedetomidine group required fewer total doses of propofol (9.6 ± 2.3 vs. 12.4 ± 3.3 mg/kg, P = 0.01) and remifentanil (9.6 ± 3.4 vs. 12.7 ± 2.6 μg/kg, P = 0.01). The change in mean arterial pressure over time differed between the groups (P < 0.05). Significantly lower mean arterial pressure was observed in the dexmedetomidine group than in the control group at immediately and 5 min after pneumoperitoneum. The time to extubation after completion of drug administration did not differ between the groups (P = 0.25). This study demonstrated that a low-dose dexmedetomidine infusion of 0.3 μg/kg/h reduced propofol and remifentanil requirements as well as hemodynamic change by pneumoperitoneum without delayed recovery during propofol-remifentanil anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Keywords

References

  1. Anesth Analg. 2004 Aug;99(2):393-8, table of contents [PMID: 15271713]
  2. Anesthesiology. 1993 May;78(5):821-8 [PMID: 8098191]
  3. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2012 Feb;62(2):113-8 [PMID: 22379564]
  4. J Pharm Sci. 2001 Feb;90(2):172-81 [PMID: 11169534]
  5. J Clin Anesth. 2007 Jun;19(4):280-5 [PMID: 17572323]
  6. Anesthesiology. 1997 Jan;86(1):10-23 [PMID: 9009935]
  7. Saudi Med J. 2009 Dec;30(12):1537-41 [PMID: 19936416]
  8. Anesth Analg. 2008 Dec;107(6):1871-4 [PMID: 19020132]
  9. Anesthesiology. 2004 Jul;101(1):239-41 [PMID: 15220796]
  10. Anesthesiology. 1999 Jun;90(6):1502-16 [PMID: 10360845]
  11. Trop Gastroenterol. 2009 Jul-Sep;30(3):171-4 [PMID: 20306755]
  12. Ir J Med Sci. 2015 Dec;184(4):805-11 [PMID: 25085686]
  13. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2012 Nov;63(5):436-40 [PMID: 23198038]
  14. Indian J Anaesth. 2014 Nov-Dec;58(6):726-31 [PMID: 25624537]
  15. Paediatr Anaesth. 2008 Dec;18(12):1190-5 [PMID: 19076573]
  16. Anesth Analg. 2005 Jun;100(6):1804-6 [PMID: 15920217]
  17. Anesth Analg. 2014 May;118(5):946-55 [PMID: 24722260]
  18. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2012 Jan-Feb;62(1):118-33 [PMID: 22248773]
  19. Anesthesiology. 2004 Sep;101(3):744-52 [PMID: 15329600]
  20. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013 Apr;57(4):480-7 [PMID: 23240685]
  21. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2001 Jan;14(1):13-21 [PMID: 16369581]
  22. Indian J Anaesth. 2012 Nov;56(6):542-6 [PMID: 23325938]
  23. Br J Anaesth. 1999 Sep;83(3):372-80 [PMID: 10655905]
  24. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2012 May;29(5):251-4 [PMID: 22450531]
  25. Anesthesiology. 1992 Dec;77(6):1134-42 [PMID: 1361311]
  26. J Clin Anesth. 2005 Mar;17(2):117-21 [PMID: 15809127]

MeSH Term

Adult
Anesthesia, General
Anesthesia, Intravenous
Anesthetics
Anesthetics, Intravenous
Arterial Pressure
Blood Pressure
Carbon Dioxide
Cholecystectomy
Dexmedetomidine
Female
Heart Rate
Hemodynamics
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Piperidines
Pneumoperitoneum
Propofol
Remifentanil
Time Factors

Chemicals

Anesthetics
Anesthetics, Intravenous
Piperidines
Carbon Dioxide
Dexmedetomidine
Remifentanil
Propofol