The Performance and Usability of a Factory-Calibrated Flash Glucose Monitoring System.

Timothy Bailey, Bruce W Bode, Mark P Christiansen, Leslie J Klaff, Shridhara Alva
Author Information
  1. Timothy Bailey: 1 AMCR Institute , Escondido, California.
  2. Bruce W Bode: 2 Atlanta Diabetes Associates , Atlanta, Georgia .
  3. Mark P Christiansen: 3 Diablo Clinical Research , Walnut Creek, California.
  4. Leslie J Klaff: 4 Rainier Clinical Research Center , Renton, Washington.
  5. Shridhara Alva: 5 Clinical Affairs, Abbott Diabetes Care , Alameda, California.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the performance and usability of the FreeStyle(®) Libre™ Flash glucose monitoring system (Abbott Diabetes Care, Alameda, CA) for interstitial glucose results compared with capillary blood glucose results.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-two study participants with type 1 or type 2 diabetes were enrolled by four U.S. clinical sites. A sensor was inserted on the back of each upper arm for up to 14 days. Three factory-only calibrated sensor lots were used in the study. Sensor glucose measurements were compared with capillary blood glucose (BG) results (approximately eight per day) obtained using the BG meter built into the reader (BG reference) and with the YSI analyzer (Yellow Springs Instrument, Yellow Springs, OH) reference tests at three clinic visits (32 samples per visit). Sensor readings were masked to the participants.
RESULTS: The accuracy of the results was demonstrated against capillary BG reference values, with 86.7% of sensor results within Consensus Error Grid Zone A. The percentage of readings within Consensus Error Grid Zone A on Days 2, 7, and 14 was 88.4%, 89.2%, and 85.2%, respectively. The overall mean absolute relative difference was 11.4%. The mean lag time between sensor and YSI reference values was 4.5±4.8 min. Sensor accuracy was not affected by factors such as body mass index, age, type of diabetes, clinical site, insulin administration, or hemoglobin A1c.
CONCLUSIONS: Interstitial glucose measurements with the FreeStyle Libre system were found to be accurate compared with capillary BG reference values, with accuracy remaining stable over 14 days of wear and unaffected by patient characteristics.

Associated Data

ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT02073058

References

  1. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014 Nov;16(11):759-67 [PMID: 25233297]
  2. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2008 Apr;10(2):102-10 [PMID: 18260773]
  3. Clin Chim Acta. 2001 May;307(1-2):187-92 [PMID: 11369356]
  4. Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Apr;28(4):525-31 [PMID: 22435798]
  5. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009 Jun;11 Suppl 1:S11-6 [PMID: 19469670]
  6. Diabetes Care. 2007 May;30(5):1125-30 [PMID: 17337488]
  7. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013 May;7(3):789-94 [PMID: 23759412]
  8. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009 Oct;11(10):669-74 [PMID: 19821760]
  9. Diabet Med. 2015 May;32(5):609-17 [PMID: 25661981]
  10. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009 Jul;3(4):971-80 [PMID: 20144348]
  11. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010 Jan;4(1):221-5 [PMID: 20167187]
  12. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 22;363(4):311-20 [PMID: 20587585]
  13. Diabetes Care. 2011 Apr;34(4):795-800 [PMID: 21335621]
  14. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013 Sep;7(5):1210-9 [PMID: 24124948]
  15. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015 Jan;17(1):8-15 [PMID: 25260047]
  16. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2003;5(4):572-86 [PMID: 14511412]
  17. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010 Sep;4(5):1087-98 [PMID: 20920428]
  18. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2008 Sep;2(5):768-77 [PMID: 19885259]
  19. Diabetes Care. 2013 Feb;36(2):251-9 [PMID: 23275350]
  20. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014 Feb;16(2):113-22 [PMID: 24205978]
  21. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009 Dec;11(12):749-55 [PMID: 20001675]
  22. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014 Jul;8(4):699-708 [PMID: 24876423]
  23. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009 Jan;11(1):11-8 [PMID: 19132850]
  24. Diabetes Care. 2009 Aug;32(8):1378-83 [PMID: 19429875]
  25. Sensors (Basel). 2010;10(12):10936-52 [PMID: 22163505]
  26. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014 Jan 1;8(1):89-94 [PMID: 24876543]
  27. Diabet Med. 2003 Nov;20(11):953-6 [PMID: 14632723]
  28. Diabetologia. 2009 Aug;52(8):1496-503 [PMID: 19526212]
  29. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2008 Oct;10(5):377-83 [PMID: 18715214]
  30. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013 Jul;7(4):842-53 [PMID: 23911165]

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Blood Glucose
Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring
Calibration
Capillaries
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Reference Values
Reproducibility of Results
Time Factors
Young Adult

Chemicals

Blood Glucose

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0glucoseresultsBGreferencecapillarysensorstudycomparedtype14SensoraccuracyvaluesFreeStyleFlashsystembloodparticipants2diabetesclinicaldaysmeasurementsperYSIYellowSpringsreadingswithinConsensusErrorGridZone4%2%meanINTRODUCTION:purposeevaluateperformanceusability®Libre™monitoringAbbottDiabetesCareAlamedaCAinterstitialMATERIALSANDMETHODS:Seventy-two1enrolledfourUSsitesinsertedbackupperarmThreefactory-onlycalibratedlotsusedapproximatelyeightdayobtainedusingmeterbuiltreaderanalyzerInstrumentOHteststhreeclinicvisits32samplesvisitmaskedRESULTS:demonstrated867%percentageDays7888985respectivelyoverallabsoluterelativedifference11lagtime45±48 minaffectedfactorsbodymassindexagesiteinsulinadministrationhemoglobinA1cCONCLUSIONS:InterstitialLibrefoundaccurateremainingstablewearunaffectedpatientcharacteristicsPerformanceUsabilityFactory-CalibratedGlucoseMonitoringSystem

Similar Articles

Cited By