Cytotype diversity and genome size variation in Knautia (Caprifoliaceae, Dipsacoideae).

Božo Frajman, Ivana Rešetnik, Hanna Weiss-Schneeweiss, Friedrich Ehrendorfer, Peter Schönswetter
Author Information
  1. Božo Frajman: Institute of Botany, University of Innsbruck, Sternwartestraße 15, A-6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
  2. Ivana Rešetnik: Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Marulićev trg 20/II, HR-10000, Zagreb, Croatia.
  3. Hanna Weiss-Schneeweiss: Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, A-1030, Vienna, Austria. hanna.schneeweiss@univie.ac.at.
  4. Friedrich Ehrendorfer: Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, A-1030, Vienna, Austria.
  5. Peter Schönswetter: Institute of Botany, University of Innsbruck, Sternwartestraße 15, A-6020, Innsbruck, Austria.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Polyploidisation is one of the most important mechanisms in the evolution of angiosperms. As in many other genera, formation of polyploids has significantly contributed to diversification and radiation of Knautia (Caprifoliaceae, Dipsacoideae). Comprehensive studies of fine- and broad-scale patterns of ploidy and genome size (GS) variation are, however, still limited to relatively few genera and little is known about the geographic distribution of ploidy levels within these genera. Here, we explore ploidy and GS variation in Knautia based on a near-complete taxonomic and comprehensive geographic sampling.
RESULTS: Genome size is a reliable indicator of ploidy level in Knautia, even if monoploid genome downsizing is observed in the polyploid cytotypes. Twenty-four species studied are diploid, 16 tetraploid and two hexaploid, whereas ten species possess two, and two species possess three ploidy levels. Di- and tetraploids are distributed across most of the distribution area of Knautia, while hexaploids were sampled in the Balkan and Iberian Peninsulas and the Alps.
CONCLUSIONS: We show that the frequency of polyploidisation is unevenly distributed in Knautia both in a geographic and phylogenetic context. Monoploid GS varies considerably among three evolutionary lineages (sections) of Knautia, but also within sections Trichera and Tricheroides, as well as within some of the species. Although the exact causes of this variation remain elusive, we demonstrate that monoploid GS increases significantly towards the limits of the genus' distribution.

References

  1. Evolution. 2012 Jan;66(1):211-28 [PMID: 22220876]
  2. Plant Cell. 2010 Jul;22(7):2277-90 [PMID: 20639445]
  3. New Phytol. 2010 Apr;186(1):63-71 [PMID: 19912548]
  4. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e39988 [PMID: 22792207]
  5. Cytometry. 2002 Jan 1;47(1):1-7 [PMID: 11774343]
  6. Plant Cell. 2001 Aug;13(8):1735-47 [PMID: 11487689]
  7. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2013;140(2-4):137-50 [PMID: 23796571]
  8. Ann Bot. 2009 Apr;103(6):963-74 [PMID: 19196717]
  9. Syst Biol. 2012 May;61(3):539-42 [PMID: 22357727]
  10. Mol Biol Evol. 2009 Jan;26(1):85-98 [PMID: 18842687]
  11. Curr Protoc Cytom. 2006 Nov;Chapter 7:Unit7.30 [PMID: 18770844]
  12. Genome. 1994 Aug;37(4):646-55 [PMID: 18470109]
  13. Mol Gen Genet. 2000 Jun;263(5):741-51 [PMID: 10905342]
  14. Genetica. 2002 May;115(1):29-36 [PMID: 12188046]
  15. Ann Bot. 2011 Feb;107(2):255-68 [PMID: 21156758]
  16. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2007 Apr;43(1):140-55 [PMID: 17188521]
  17. Am J Bot. 2004 Mar;91(3):439-48 [PMID: 21653400]
  18. Trends Ecol Evol. 1999 Sep;14(9):348-352 [PMID: 10441308]
  19. Am J Bot. 2009 Jan;96(1):336-48 [PMID: 21628192]
  20. Ann Bot. 2006 Sep;98(3):665-78 [PMID: 16868002]
  21. Ann Bot. 2005 Jan;95(1):177-90 [PMID: 15596465]
  22. New Phytol. 2007;174(3):669-682 [PMID: 17447921]
  23. Ann Bot. 2008 Oct;102(4):599-607 [PMID: 18684733]
  24. New Phytol. 2014 Mar;201(4):1484-1497 [PMID: 24299166]
  25. Ann Bot. 2013 Mar;111(3):419-31 [PMID: 23348752]
  26. Ann Bot. 2013 Jun;111(6):1095-108 [PMID: 23589633]
  27. Am J Bot. 2007 Aug;94(8):1391-401 [PMID: 21636507]
  28. Methods Cell Biol. 1990;33:105-10 [PMID: 1707478]
  29. Chromosome Res. 2012 Feb;20(2):303-15 [PMID: 22362177]
  30. New Phytol. 2005 Oct;168(1):241-52 [PMID: 16159337]
  31. Plant J. 2013 Jun;74(5):829-39 [PMID: 23517128]
  32. Ann Bot. 2010 Feb;105(2):249-64 [PMID: 20007978]
  33. BMC Evol Biol. 2013 Jul 03;13:136 [PMID: 23819574]
  34. Ann Bot. 2012 Oct;110(5):977-86 [PMID: 23002267]
  35. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2014 May;74:97-110 [PMID: 24508604]
  36. Mol Biol Evol. 2004 May;21(5):860-9 [PMID: 15014163]
  37. Am J Bot. 2012 Jun;99(6):1043-57 [PMID: 22645096]
  38. Ann Bot. 2011 Jan;107(1):77-87 [PMID: 21059612]
  39. Ann Bot. 2010 Dec;106(6):967-77 [PMID: 20880930]
  40. Annu Rev Genet. 1999;33:479-532 [PMID: 10690416]
  41. Ann Bot. 2009 Oct;104(5):965-73 [PMID: 19633312]
  42. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005;109(1-3):250-8 [PMID: 15753584]
  43. Heredity (Edinb). 2013 Feb;110(2):99-104 [PMID: 23149459]
  44. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Aug 18;106(33):13875-9 [PMID: 19667210]
  45. Preslia. 2009;81(3):309-319 [PMID: 22318659]
  46. Ann Bot. 2013 Apr;111(4):641-9 [PMID: 23425783]
  47. Ann Bot. 2005 Jan;95(1):91-8 [PMID: 15596458]
  48. Ann Bot. 2008 Apr;101(6):805-14 [PMID: 18222910]

MeSH Term

Biological Evolution
Caprifoliaceae
Chromosomes, Plant
Genome Size
Magnoliopsida
Phylogeny
Polyploidy

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0KnautiaploidyGSvariationspeciesgeneragenomesizegeographicdistributionwithintwosignificantlyCaprifoliaceaeDipsacoideaelevelsmonoploidpossessthreedistributedsectionsBACKGROUND:PolyploidisationoneimportantmechanismsevolutionangiospermsmanyformationpolyploidscontributeddiversificationradiationComprehensivestudiesfine-broad-scalepatternshoweverstilllimitedrelativelylittleknownexplorebasednear-completetaxonomiccomprehensivesamplingRESULTS:GenomereliableindicatorlevelevendownsizingobservedpolyploidcytotypesTwenty-fourstudieddiploid16tetraploidhexaploidwhereastenDi-tetraploidsacrossareahexaploidssampledBalkanIberianPeninsulasAlpsCONCLUSIONS:showfrequencypolyploidisationunevenlyphylogeneticcontextMonoploidvariesconsiderablyamongevolutionarylineagesalsoTricheraTricheroideswellAlthoughexactcausesremainelusivedemonstrateincreasestowardslimitsgenus'Cytotypediversity

Similar Articles

Cited By