Emotional words can be embodied or disembodied: the role of superficial vs. deep types of processing.

Ensie Abbassi, Isabelle Blanchette, Ana I Ansaldo, Habib Ghassemzadeh, Yves Joanette
Author Information
  1. Ensie Abbassi: Centre de Recherche, Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal and Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC Canada.
  2. Isabelle Blanchette: Département de Psychologie, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC Canada.
  3. Ana I Ansaldo: Centre de Recherche, Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal and Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC Canada.
  4. Habib Ghassemzadeh: Department of Psychiatry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran Iran ; Visiting Scholar, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR USA.
  5. Yves Joanette: Centre de Recherche, Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal and Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC Canada.

Abstract

Emotional words are processed rapidly and automatically in the left hemisphere (LH) and slowly, with the involvement of attention, in the right hemisphere (RH). This review aims to find the reason for this difference and suggests that emotional words can be processed superficially or deeply due to the involvement of the linguistic and imagery systems, respectively. During superficial processing, emotional words likely make connections only with semantically associated words in the LH. This part of the process is automatic and may be sufficient for the purpose of language processing. Deep processing, in contrast, seems to involve conceptual information and imagery of a word's perceptual and emotional properties using autobiographical memory contents. Imagery and the involvement of autobiographical memory likely differentiate between emotional and neutral word processing and explain the salient role of the RH in emotional word processing. It is concluded that the level of emotional word processing in the RH should be deeper than in the LH and, thus, it is conceivable that the slow mode of processing adds certain qualities to the output.

Keywords

References

  1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Mar 15;91(6):2016-20 [PMID: 8134342]
  2. Psychol Sci. 2007 Jun;18(6):475-80 [PMID: 17576257]
  3. Psychother Psychosom. 1985;44(2):89-94 [PMID: 2419941]
  4. Cogn Sci. 2007 Feb;31(1):183-92 [PMID: 21635293]
  5. Cereb Cortex. 2012 Jul;22(7):1634-47 [PMID: 21914634]
  6. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2005 May;22(3):455-79 [PMID: 21038261]
  7. Cognition. 1992 Mar;42(1-3):61-105 [PMID: 1582161]
  8. Top Cogn Sci. 2011 Apr;3(2):273-302 [PMID: 25164297]
  9. Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Aug;15(4):838-44 [PMID: 18792513]
  10. Cognition. 2007 Jul;104(1):19-46 [PMID: 16814274]
  11. J Physiol Paris. 2008 Jan-May;102(1-3):106-19 [PMID: 18468869]
  12. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007 Dec;8(12):976-87 [PMID: 18026167]
  13. J Physiol Paris. 2008 Jan-May;102(1-3):59-70 [PMID: 18448316]
  14. Neuropsychologia. 2010 Jan;48(1):43-50 [PMID: 19686767]
  15. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2003 May 1;20(3):525-40 [PMID: 20957583]
  16. Psychother Psychosom. 1985;44(1):1-5 [PMID: 4080924]
  17. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2011 Sep;11(3):372-85 [PMID: 21533883]
  18. Cogn Sci. 2008 Apr 5;32(3):579-90 [PMID: 21635347]
  19. J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Mar;19(3):525-42 [PMID: 17335399]
  20. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 May;9(5):619-27 [PMID: 23482627]
  21. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 May 12;364(1521):1281-9 [PMID: 19528009]
  22. Psychon Bull Rev. 1996 Jun;3(2):135-48 [PMID: 24213861]
  23. Front Psychol. 2012 Oct 16;3:385 [PMID: 23133427]
  24. Cogn Psychol. 2001 Sep;43(2):129-69 [PMID: 11527433]
  25. Psychol Sci. 2003 Mar;14(2):119-24 [PMID: 12661672]
  26. Psychopathology. 2003 Jul-Aug;36(4):171-80 [PMID: 14504450]
  27. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Apr 09;7:125 [PMID: 23576972]
  28. Neuroimage. 2005 Aug 1;27(1):188-200 [PMID: 15893940]
  29. Annu Rev Psychol. 2008;59:617-45 [PMID: 17705682]
  30. J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 Jun;25(6):920-35 [PMID: 23363408]
  31. Brain Lang. 2012 Sep;122(3):211-26 [PMID: 22277309]
  32. Behav Brain Sci. 1999 Aug;22(4):577-609; discussion 610-60 [PMID: 11301525]
  33. Emotion. 2005 Dec;5(4):489-97 [PMID: 16366752]
  34. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Oct;83(4):804-16 [PMID: 12374436]
  35. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Nov;15(11):527-36 [PMID: 22001867]
  36. Neuropsychologia. 2011 Aug;49(10):2947-56 [PMID: 21756925]
  37. Cortex. 2012 Jul;48(7):788-804 [PMID: 21163473]
  38. Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Jun;14(3):436-41 [PMID: 17874584]
  39. Cogn Psychol. 2004 Jun;48(4):422-88 [PMID: 15099798]
  40. Neuropsychologia. 2014 Apr;56:79-89 [PMID: 24440410]
  41. Neuroimage. 2000 Oct;12(4):478-84 [PMID: 10988041]
  42. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2006;10(1):20-46 [PMID: 16430327]
  43. J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Nov;16(9):1583-94 [PMID: 15622612]
  44. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2010 Jul;1(4):586-96 [PMID: 26271505]
  45. Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Oct;16(5):914-9 [PMID: 19815798]
  46. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2003 May 1;20(3):451-86 [PMID: 20957580]
  47. Neuropsychologia. 2009 Sep;47(11):2290-8 [PMID: 19159634]
  48. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2001 Apr;11(2):194-201 [PMID: 11301239]
  49. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2011 Feb;140(1):14-34 [PMID: 21171803]
  50. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2005;9(3):184-211 [PMID: 16083360]
  51. Mem Cognit. 2004 Mar;32(2):244-59 [PMID: 15190717]
  52. Cereb Cortex. 2007 Jul;17(7):1516-30 [PMID: 16926240]
  53. Cognition. 1989 Nov;33(1-2):25-62 [PMID: 2691184]
  54. J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Sep;22(9):2027-41 [PMID: 19722916]
  55. Neuroimage. 2010 Dec;53(4):1318-25 [PMID: 20619347]
  56. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001 Sep;2(9):635-42 [PMID: 11533731]
  57. Psychother Psychosom. 1985;43(4):202-8 [PMID: 4034891]
  58. J Cogn Neurosci. 2000 Jan;12(1):1-47 [PMID: 10769304]
  59. Am J Psychol. 2006 Fall;119(3):349-84 [PMID: 17061691]
  60. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003 Jul 29;358(1435):1177-87 [PMID: 12903648]
  61. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2009 Oct;132(2):173-89 [PMID: 19298949]
  62. Emotion. 2008 Jun;8(3):395-409 [PMID: 18540755]
  63. Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Dec;9(4):625-36 [PMID: 12613670]
  64. Psychol Bull. 1996 Jul;120(1):3-24 [PMID: 8711015]
  65. Neuropsychologia. 2011 Apr;49(5):1105-27 [PMID: 21192959]
  66. Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Apr;30(3):349-62 [PMID: 20116915]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0processingemotionalwordsLHinvolvementRHwordEmotionalprocessedhemispherecanimagerysuperficiallikelyconceptualautobiographicalmemoryrolerapidlyautomaticallyleftslowlyattentionrightreviewaimsfindreasondifferencesuggestssuperficiallydeeplyduelinguisticsystemsrespectivelymakeconnectionssemanticallyassociatedpartprocessautomaticmaysufficientpurposelanguageDeepcontrastseemsinvolveinformationword'sperceptualpropertiesusingcontentsImagerydifferentiateneutralexplainsalientconcludedleveldeeperthusconceivableslowmodeaddscertainqualitiesoutputembodieddisembodied:vsdeeptypescerebralhemispheresdisembodied/embodiedmeaningaccesssuperficial/deep

Similar Articles

Cited By (4)