Exploring Social Networking Technologies as Tools for HIV Prevention for Men Who Have Sex With Men.

Jorge Ramallo, Thomas Kidder, Tashuna Albritton, Gary Blick, John Pachankis, Valen Grandelski, Valen Grandeleski, Trace Kershaw
Author Information
  1. Jorge Ramallo: Department of Internal Medicine-Pediatrics, University of Illinois Chicago.
  2. Thomas Kidder: World Health Clinicians, Norwalk, Connecticut.
  3. Tashuna Albritton: Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
  4. Gary Blick: World Health Clinicians, Norwalk, Connecticut.
  5. John Pachankis: Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
  6. Valen Grandeleski: Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
  7. Trace Kershaw: Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.

Abstract

Social networking technologies are influential among men who have sex with men (MSM) and may be an important strategy for HIV prevention. We conducted focus groups with HIV positive and negative participants. Almost all participants used social networking sites to meet new friends and sexual partners. The main obstacle to effective HIV prevention campaigns in social networking platforms was stigmatization based on homosexuality as well as HIV status. Persistent stigma associated with HIV status and disclosure was cited as a top reason for avoiding HIV-related conversations while meeting new partners using social technologies. Further, social networking sites have different social etiquettes and rules that may increase HIV risk by discouraging HIV status disclosure. Overall, successful interventions for MSM using social networking technologies must consider aspects of privacy, stigma, and social norms in order to enact HIV reduction among MSM.

References

  1. Am J Prev Med. 2012 Nov;43(5):467-74 [PMID: 23079168]
  2. J Med Internet Res. 2013 Feb 07;15(2):e25 [PMID: 23391459]
  3. AIDS Care. 2012;24(8):945-52 [PMID: 22519523]
  4. Lancet. 2012 Jul 28;380(9839):367-77 [PMID: 22819660]
  5. AIDS Behav. 2008 Nov;12(6):867-75 [PMID: 18401701]
  6. PLoS One. 2013 May 01;8(5):e62271 [PMID: 23658716]
  7. Am J Public Health. 2008 Jun;98(6):1059-67 [PMID: 18445804]
  8. AIDS Behav. 2014 Jan;18(1):41-9 [PMID: 23925515]
  9. AIDS Behav. 2013 Nov;17(9):2986-98 [PMID: 23673791]
  10. J Urban Health. 2013 Aug;90(4):729-39 [PMID: 22983721]
  11. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012 Sep;44(3):176-83 [PMID: 22958662]
  12. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Sep 3;159(5):318-24 [PMID: 24026317]
  13. AIDS Educ Prev. 2012 Apr;24(2):102-16 [PMID: 22468972]
  14. Health Educ Behav. 2012 Jun;39(3):276-89 [PMID: 21490310]
  15. AIDS Behav. 2015 Jun;19 Suppl 2:98-105 [PMID: 25572831]
  16. AIDS Behav. 2010 Dec;14(6):1362-70 [PMID: 20799060]
  17. JAMA Pediatr. 2013 Jun;167(6):574-80 [PMID: 23568703]
  18. BMC Public Health. 2011 Jul 21;11:583 [PMID: 21777470]
  19. AIDS. 2005 Apr;19 Suppl 1:S87-97 [PMID: 15838198]
  20. Open AIDS J. 2012;6:98-107 [PMID: 23049658]

Grants

  1. P30 MH062294/NIMH NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Focus Groups
HIV Infections
HIV Seronegativity
HIV Seropositivity
Homosexuality, Male
Humans
Interviews as Topic
Male
Middle Aged
Mobile Applications
Risk-Taking
Sexual Partners
Social Networking
Social Stigma

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0HIVsocialnetworkingtechnologiesMSMstatusSocialamongmenmaypreventionparticipantssitesnewpartnersstigmadisclosureusingMeninfluentialseximportantstrategyconductedfocusgroupspositivenegativeAlmostusedmeetfriendssexualmainobstacleeffectivecampaignsplatformsstigmatizationbasedhomosexualitywellPersistentassociatedcitedtopreasonavoidingHIV-relatedconversationsmeetingdifferentetiquettesrulesincreaseriskdiscouragingOverallsuccessfulinterventionsmustconsideraspectsprivacynormsorderenactreductionExploringNetworkingTechnologiesToolsPreventionSex

Similar Articles

Cited By