OpenLB
Open Library of Bioscience
Advanced Search
International journal of nanomedicine
2015;10 4837-46.

Ongoing ethical issues concerning authorship in biomedical journals: an integrative review.

Rachel Anne Kornhaber, Loyola M McLean, Rodney J Baber
Author Information
  1. Rachel Anne Kornhaber: Faculty of Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania, Alexandria, New South Wales, Australia ; School of Nursing, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  2. Loyola M McLean: Brain and Mind Centre and Westmead Psychotherapy Program, Discipline of Psychiatry, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia ; Sydney West and Greater Southern Psychiatry Training Network, Cumberland Hospital, Western Sydney Local Health District, Parramatta, New South Wales, Australia ; Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  3. Rodney J Baber: Discipline of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Neonatology, Sydney Medical School, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia ; Royal North Shore Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
PMID: 26257520 DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S87585

Abstract

Health professionals publishing within the field of health sciences continue to experience issues concerning appropriate authorship, which have clinical, ethical, and academic implications. This integrative review sought to explore the key issues concerning authorship from a bioethical standpoint, aiming to explore the key features of the authorship debate. Studies were identified through an electronic search, using the PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and Scopus databases of peer-reviewed research, published between 2009 and 2014, limited to English language research, with search terms developed to reflect the current issues of authorship. From among the 279 papers identified, 20 research papers met the inclusion criteria. Findings were compiled and then arranged to identify themes and relationships. The review incorporated a wide range of authorship issues encompassing equal-credited authors, honorary (guest/gift) and ghost authorship, perception/experiences of authorship, and guidelines/policies. This review suggests that the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors' (ICMJE) recommended guidelines for authorship are not reflected in current authorship practices within the domain of health sciences in both low-and high-impact-factor journals. This devaluing of the true importance of authorship has the potential to affect the validity of authorship, diminish the real contributions of the true authors, and negatively affect patient care.

Keywords

ICMJE authorship bioethics equal credit ghost honorary

References

  1. Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2014 Oct;22(10):781-91 [PMID: 25558501]
  2. Dan Med J. 2012 May;59(5):A4455 [PMID: 22549492]
  3. BMC Med Educ. 2010 Mar 09;10:21 [PMID: 20214826]
  4. J Med Ethics. 2014 May;40(5):346-8 [PMID: 23955369]
  5. Radiology. 2014 May;271(2):472-8 [PMID: 24475845]
  6. Crit Care Med. 2012 Mar;40(3):967-9 [PMID: 22020242]
  7. J Adv Nurs. 2005 Dec;52(5):546-53 [PMID: 16268861]
  8. Am J Med Sci. 2011 Feb;341(2):106-9 [PMID: 20924283]
  9. J Med Ethics. 2005 May;31(5):308 [PMID: 15863695]
  10. PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20206 [PMID: 21713036]
  11. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010 Oct;85(10):920-7 [PMID: 20884825]
  12. J Med Ethics. 2011 Jul;37(7):424-8 [PMID: 21266387]
  13. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Jun;198(6):1247-55 [PMID: 22623536]
  14. PLoS One. 2013 Aug 05;8(8):e71430 [PMID: 23940753]
  15. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Dec 20;12:189 [PMID: 23256648]
  16. Emerg Med (Fremantle). 2003 Jun;15(3):263-70 [PMID: 12786648]
  17. Sci Eng Ethics. 2011 Jun;17(2):335-9 [PMID: 21611821]
  18. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Jan-Feb;14(1):16-8 [PMID: 17068347]
  19. Dev World Bioeth. 2014 Apr;14(1):15-9 [PMID: 23025813]
  20. Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Oct;15(10):963-9 [PMID: 18801021]
  21. Prog Transplant. 2005 Mar;15(1):8-13 [PMID: 15839365]
  22. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Aug;85(8):1605-9 [PMID: 12925643]
  23. BMJ. 2011 Oct 25;343:d6128 [PMID: 22028479]
  24. Radiology. 2011 May;259(2):479-86 [PMID: 21386051]
  25. J Investig Med. 2007 May;55(4):174-80 [PMID: 17651671]
  26. Iran J Public Health. 2011;40(1):15-21 [PMID: 23113050]
  27. Ann Epidemiol. 2010 Nov;20(11):868-71 [PMID: 20933195]
  28. BMC Med Ethics. 2014 Jul 02;15:53 [PMID: 24989359]
  29. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Mar;95(3):418-28 [PMID: 24215989]
  30. Soc Sci Med. 2010 May;70(9):1458-65 [PMID: 20172638]
  31. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2009 Dec;60(5):231-6 [PMID: 19819102]
  32. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2014 Apr;48(2):335-45 [PMID: 24918895]
  33. PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e23477 [PMID: 21931600]

MeSH Term

Authorship
Biomedical Research
Humans
Periodicals as Topic
Journal Article Review
Article has an altmetric score of 6

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0authorshipissuesreviewconcerningresearchHealthwithinhealthsciencesethicalintegrativeexplorekeyidentifiedsearchcurrentpapersauthorshonoraryghostICMJEtrueaffectprofessionalspublishingfieldcontinueexperienceappropriateclinicalacademicimplicationssoughtbioethicalstandpointaimingfeaturesdebateStudieselectronicusingPubMedCumulativeIndexNursingAlliedLiteratureCINAHLScopusdatabasespeer-reviewedpublished20092014limitedEnglishlanguagetermsdevelopedreflectamong27920metinclusioncriteriaFindingscompiledarrangedidentifythemesrelationshipsincorporatedwiderangeencompassingequal-creditedguest/giftperception/experiencesguidelines/policiessuggestsInternationalCommitteeMedicalJournalEditors'recommendedguidelinesreflectedpracticesdomainlow-andhigh-impact-factorjournalsdevaluingimportancepotentialvaliditydiminishrealcontributionsnegativelypatientcareOngoingbiomedicaljournals:bioethicsequalcredit

Similar Articles

Cited By (29)