Histological examination and clinical evaluation of the jawbone of an adult patient with cleidocranial dysplasia: a case report.

Sigmar Schnutenhaus, Ralph G Luthardt, Heike Rudolph, Werner Götz
Author Information
  1. Sigmar Schnutenhaus: Private Practice Hilzingen, Germany ; Department of Dentistry, Clinic of Prosthetic Dentistry, Ulm University Hospital Ulm, Germany.
  2. Ralph G Luthardt: Department of Dentistry, Clinic of Prosthetic Dentistry, Ulm University Hospital Ulm, Germany.
  3. Heike Rudolph: Department of Dentistry, Clinic of Prosthetic Dentistry, Ulm University Hospital Ulm, Germany.
  4. Werner Götz: Department of Orthodontics, Oral Biology Laboratory, University of Bonn Germany.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Cleidocranial dysplasia (CCD) is a rare congenital malformation syndrome, inherited autosomal-dominantly. During a course of treatment including surgical, implantological and restorative procedures, an opportunity arose to histologically examine biopsies of the maxilla and mandible of a CCD patient 47 years of age.
CASE REPORT: The aim of this case report is to present the results of the histological evaluation of the alveolar bone and the surgical pretreatment for and placement of six implants each in the maxilla and the mandible. The implants were inserted in a minimally invasive procedure using 3D template guidance. Following uneventful healing of the implants, ceramically veneered bridges were cemented on individual titanium abutments. Since the patient had not received orthodontic treatment in childhood-which would have been the treatment modality of choice-this implantological and prosthodontic approach was necessary. Biopsies were taken from the maxilla and the mandible before placing the implants. Histological evaluation showed bone with strong, coarsely interconnecting trabeculae, especially in the maxilla. Both the bone and the gingiva otherwise exhibited a normal structure without pathological features or anomalies.
CONCLUSION: The clinical parameters and histological evaluation of this one clinical case suggest that the concepts familiar from general oral implantology in terms of surgical and prosthetic procedures can be adopted for older patients with CCD.

Keywords

References

  1. Case Rep Dent. 2012;2012:262043 [PMID: 23320199]
  2. J Orofac Orthop. 2009 Nov;70(6):495-510 [PMID: 19960292]
  3. Int J Oral Surg. 1974;3(6):380-5 [PMID: 4217313]
  4. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004 Mar-Apr;19(2):282-7 [PMID: 15101601]
  5. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol. 1993 Apr-Jun;13(2):98-108 [PMID: 8325973]
  6. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2003 Nov;32(6):347-54 [PMID: 15070835]
  7. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1977 Dec;44(6):830-6 [PMID: 271922]
  8. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24 Suppl:28-38 [PMID: 19885433]
  9. J Am Dent Assoc. 1982 Oct;105(4):661-6 [PMID: 6957474]
  10. J Craniofac Surg. 2005 Nov;16(6):1122-6 [PMID: 16327567]
  11. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003 Feb;14(1):125-30 [PMID: 12562375]
  12. Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol Odontol. 1993 Jul-Sep;36(3-4):101-7 [PMID: 8219688]
  13. Minerva Stomatol. 2010 Mar;59(3):117-27 [PMID: 20357738]
  14. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Apr;40(4):434-7 [PMID: 21115325]
  15. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2004 Jan;14(1):49-53 [PMID: 14706028]
  16. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1997 Fall;22(1):83-6 [PMID: 9643211]
  17. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol. 1995 Oct-Dec;15(4):212-21 [PMID: 8719350]
  18. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005 Feb;99(2):185-90 [PMID: 15660090]
  19. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 May-Jun;26(3):618-30 [PMID: 21691610]
  20. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997 Jan;111(1):28-33 [PMID: 9009920]
  21. Br Dent J. 1975 Oct 21;139(8):313-8 [PMID: 1058009]
  22. Angle Orthod. 2009 Jan;79(1):178-85 [PMID: 19123713]
  23. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1999 Mar;28(2):89-97 [PMID: 10522197]
  24. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1974 May;121(1):5-16 [PMID: 4833883]
  25. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23 Suppl 6:124-35 [PMID: 23062137]
  26. Dent Pract Dent Rec. 1972 Feb;22(6):215-9 [PMID: 4502590]
  27. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23 Suppl 6:217-28 [PMID: 23062144]
  28. Stoma (Heidelb). 1970 Nov;23(4):212-5 [PMID: 5276162]
  29. J Prosthodont. 2014 Jan;23(1):64-70 [PMID: 23725034]
  30. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24 Suppl:118-25 [PMID: 19885439]
  31. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013 Jan;115(1):46-55 [PMID: 23102800]
  32. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29 Suppl:271-86 [PMID: 24660203]
  33. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2010 Mar;11(1):39-43 [PMID: 20359281]
  34. J Prosthodont. 2011 Oct;20 Suppl 2:S26-31 [PMID: 22003879]
  35. Hum Mol Genet. 1995 Jan;4(1):71-5 [PMID: 7711736]
  36. Australas Radiol. 1992 Aug;36(3):238-42 [PMID: 1445108]
  37. Korean J Orthod. 2013 Oct;43(5):248-60 [PMID: 24228240]
  38. Gen Dent. 2008 May-Jun;56(4):393, 395-6 [PMID: 19284203]
  39. Indian J Dent Res. 2008 Jul-Sep;19(3):253-6 [PMID: 18797104]
  40. Am J Med Genet. 2001 Nov 15;104(1):1-6 [PMID: 11746020]
  41. J Orofac Orthop. 2010 Jan;71(1):17-31 [PMID: 20135247]
  42. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2012 Dec;12(4):252-5 [PMID: 24293923]
  43. J Med Genet. 1999 Mar;36(3):177-82 [PMID: 10204840]
  44. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Mar;21(3):255-61 [PMID: 19958375]
  45. Eur J Oral Sci. 2006 Oct;114(5):361-73 [PMID: 17026500]
  46. J Periodontol. 2006 Jun;77(6):1085-90 [PMID: 16734586]
  47. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 May;131(5):666-9 [PMID: 17482089]
  48. Dent Update. 1999 Dec;26(10):458-62 [PMID: 10765791]
  49. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997 Feb;111(2):173-83 [PMID: 9057617]
  50. Dent Clin North Am. 1987 Jul;31(3):441-56 [PMID: 3301437]
  51. J Dent. 2010 Aug;38(8):612-20 [PMID: 20546821]
  52. Br Dent J. 1992 Mar 21;172(6):243-7 [PMID: 1554531]
  53. Int J Oral Surg. 1978 Aug;7(4):267-73 [PMID: 100437]
  54. Odontol Revy. 1971;22(4):363-9 [PMID: 5292152]
  55. J Prosthet Dent. 1974 May;31(5):518-26 [PMID: 4595888]
  56. Quintessence Int. 1991 May;22(5):349-54 [PMID: 1681565]
  57. J Periodontol. 2015 Feb;86(2):185-91 [PMID: 25186777]
  58. Aust Dent J. 1984 Feb;29(1):1-4 [PMID: 6378162]
  59. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1997 May;18(5):509-12, 514 [PMID: 9533362]
  60. J Dent Res. 2009 Aug;88(8):693-703 [PMID: 19734454]
  61. J Can Dent Assoc. 2006 May;72(4):337-42 [PMID: 16684478]
  62. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Jul;128(1):110-7 [PMID: 16027635]

MeSH Term

Adult
Biopsy
Cleidocranial Dysplasia
Dental Implantation, Endosseous
Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported
Dental Veneers
Humans
Male
Mandible
Maxilla
Middle Aged
Osseointegration
Radiography, Panoramic
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0implantsmaxillaevaluationCCDtreatmentsurgicalmandiblepatientcaseboneclinicalCleidocranialdysplasiaimplantologicalproceduresreporthistologicalHistologicalOBJECTIVES:rarecongenitalmalformationsyndromeinheritedautosomal-dominantlycourseincludingrestorativeopportunityarosehistologicallyexaminebiopsies47yearsageCASEREPORT:aimpresentresultsalveolarpretreatmentplacementsixinsertedminimallyinvasiveprocedureusing3DtemplateguidanceFollowinguneventfulhealingceramicallyveneeredbridgescementedindividualtitaniumabutmentsSincereceivedorthodonticchildhood-whichmodalitychoice-thisprosthodonticapproachnecessaryBiopsiestakenplacingshowedstrongcoarselyinterconnectingtrabeculaeespeciallygingivaotherwiseexhibitednormalstructurewithoutpathologicalfeaturesanomaliesCONCLUSION:parametersonesuggestconceptsfamiliargeneraloralimplantologytermsprostheticcanadoptedolderpatientsexaminationjawboneadultcleidocranialdysplasia:computer-assistedsurgerydentalhistologyosseointegration

Similar Articles

Cited By