Susceptibility to cognitive distortions: the role of eating pathology.

Jennifer S Coelho, Catherine Ouellet-Courtois, Christine Purdon, Howard Steiger
Author Information
  1. Jennifer S Coelho: Eating Disorders Program, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, Canada ; Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada ; Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada.
  2. Catherine Ouellet-Courtois: Eating Disorders Program, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, Canada.
  3. Christine Purdon: Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
  4. Howard Steiger: Eating Disorders Program, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, Canada ; Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Thought-Shape Fusion (TSF) and Thought-Action Fusion (TAF) are cognitive distortions that are associated with eating and obsessional pathology respectively. Both involve the underlying belief that mere thoughts and mental images can lead to negative outcomes. TSF involves the belief that food-related thoughts lead to weight gain, body dissatisfaction, and perceptions of moral wrong-doing. TAF is more general, and involves the belief that merely thinking about a negative event (e.g., a loved one getting into a car accident) can make this event more likely to happen, and leads to perceptions of moral wrong-doing. However, the shared susceptibility across related cognitive distortions-TAF and TSF-has not yet been studied.
METHOD: The effects of TSF and TAF inductions in women with an eating disorder (n = 21) and a group of healthy control women with no history of an eating disorder (n = 23) were measured. A repeated-measures design was employed, with all participants exposed to a TSF, TAF and neutral induction during three separate experimental sessions. Participants' cognitive and behavioral responses were assessed.
RESULTS: Individuals with eating disorders were more susceptible to TSF and TAF than were control participants, demonstrating more neutralization behavior after TSF and TAF inductions (i.e., actions to try to reduce the negative effects of the induction), and reporting higher levels of trait TAF and TSF than did controls.
CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with eating disorders are particularly susceptible to both TAF and TSF. Clinical implications of these findings will be discussed.

Keywords

References

  1. Behav Res Ther. 2011 Apr;49(4):289-93 [PMID: 21316647]
  2. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2015 May;23(3):179-84 [PMID: 25728327]
  3. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2010 Dec;41(4):409-17 [PMID: 20511122]
  4. Behav Res Ther. 2012 Aug;50(7-8):449-56 [PMID: 22659153]
  5. Behav Res Ther. 2001 Jul;39(7):757-64 [PMID: 11419607]
  6. Behav Res Ther. 2003 Sep;41(9):1069-79 [PMID: 12914808]
  7. Behav Res Ther. 1999 Mar;37(3):231-7 [PMID: 10087641]
  8. Behav Res Ther. 2008 Feb;46(2):219-28 [PMID: 18163975]
  9. Assessment. 2013 Dec;20(6):764-75 [PMID: 22315482]
  10. Br J Clin Psychol. 2006 Sep;45(Pt 3):331-42 [PMID: 17147100]
  11. Br J Clin Psychol. 1999 Jun;38 ( Pt 2):167-79 [PMID: 10389598]
  12. J Psychoeduc Assess. 2009 Nov 22;20(10):1-13 [PMID: 20567603]
  13. Behav Res Ther. 2002 Oct;40(10):1169-77 [PMID: 12375725]
  14. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2013 May;201(5):407-13 [PMID: 23595095]
  15. Br J Clin Psychol. 2004 Nov;43(Pt 4):399-408 [PMID: 15530210]
  16. Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2006 Apr-Jun;18(2):115-21 [PMID: 16754417]
  17. Eat Weight Disord. 2013 Sep;18(3):245-53 [PMID: 23881747]
  18. Int J Eat Disord. 2013 Jan;46(1):77-85 [PMID: 22821739]
  19. Behav Res Ther. 2011 Oct;49(10):646-53 [PMID: 21803332]
  20. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2004 Jun;35(2):87-107 [PMID: 15210372]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0TSFTAFeatingcognitivebeliefnegativedisordersFusionpathologythoughtscanleadinvolvesperceptionsmoralwrong-doingeventeeffectsinductionswomendisordercontrolparticipantsinductionIndividualssusceptiblefusionBACKGROUND:Thought-ShapeThought-Actiondistortionsassociatedobsessionalrespectivelyinvolveunderlyingmerementalimagesoutcomesfood-relatedweightgainbodydissatisfactiongeneralmerelythinkingglovedonegettingcaraccidentmakelikelyhappenleadsHoweversharedsusceptibilityacrossrelateddistortions-TAFTSF-hasyetstudiedMETHOD:n = 21grouphealthyhistoryn = 23measuredrepeated-measuresdesignemployedexposedneutralthreeseparateexperimentalsessionsParticipants'behavioralresponsesassessedRESULTS:demonstratingneutralizationbehavioriactionstryreducereportinghigherlevelstraitcontrolsCONCLUSIONS:particularlyClinicalimplicationsfindingswilldiscussedSusceptibilitydistortions:roleCognitivedistortionEatingThought-actionThought-shape

Similar Articles

Cited By