The relationship between attention allocation and cheating.

Andrea Pittarello, Daphna Motro, Enrico Rubaltelli, Patrik Pluchino
Author Information
  1. Andrea Pittarello: Psychology Department, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel. andre.pittarello@gmail.com.
  2. Daphna Motro: Department of Management and Organizations, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA. dmotro@email.arizona.edu.
  3. Enrico Rubaltelli: Department of Developmental and Socialization Psychology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
  4. Patrik Pluchino: Department of Developmental and Socialization Psychology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.

Abstract

Little is known about the relationship between attention allocation and dishonesty. The goal of the present work was to address this issue using the eyetracking methodology. We developed a novel task in which participants could honestly report seeing a particular card and lose money, or they could falsely report not seeing the card and not lose money. When participants cheated, they allocated less attention (i.e., shorter fixation durations and fewer fixations) to the card than when they behaved honestly. Our results suggest that when dishonesty pays, shifting attention away from undesirable information can serve as a self-deception strategy that allows individuals to serve their self-interests while maintaining a positive self-concept.

Keywords

References

  1. Behav Res Methods. 2011 Sep;43(3):853-63 [PMID: 21487902]
  2. Neuroreport. 1997 Dec 1;8(17):3661-5 [PMID: 9427347]
  3. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012 Nov;141(4):757-73 [PMID: 22409664]
  4. Cognition. 2012 Mar;122(3):267-79 [PMID: 22197059]
  5. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Sep;35(5):1196-206 [PMID: 19686015]
  6. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014 Mar;106(3):398-417 [PMID: 24377356]
  7. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2005 Mar;31(3):407-15 [PMID: 15657455]
  8. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Jun;35(3):876-95 [PMID: 19485697]
  9. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2011 Mar;37(3):330-49 [PMID: 21307176]
  10. Psychol Sci. 2009 Aug;20(8):923-7 [PMID: 19549082]
  11. Nat Neurosci. 2003 Dec;6(12):1317-22 [PMID: 14608360]
  12. Psychol Sci. 2015 Jun;26(6):794-804 [PMID: 25878171]
  13. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1998 Dec;76(3):253-276 [PMID: 9878510]
  14. Front Psychol. 2012 Jun 13;3:173 [PMID: 22707943]
  15. Psychol Sci. 2005 Jun;16(6):435-9 [PMID: 15943668]
  16. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2013 Sep;144(1):190-206 [PMID: 23845447]
  17. Front Psychol. 2012 Oct 01;3:335 [PMID: 23162481]
  18. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2010 Nov;57(11):null [PMID: 20667803]
  19. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Oct;91(4):612-25 [PMID: 17014288]
  20. Psychol Sci. 2010 May;21(5):712-20 [PMID: 20483851]

MeSH Term

Adult
Attention
Deception
Eye Movement Measurements
Female
Humans
Male
Self Concept
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0attentioncardrelationshipallocationdishonestyparticipantshonestlyreportseeinglosemoneyserveLittleknowngoalpresentworkaddressissueusingeyetrackingmethodologydevelopednoveltaskparticularfalselycheatedallocatedlessieshorterfixationdurationsfewerfixationsbehavedresultssuggestpaysshiftingawayundesirableinformationcanself-deceptionstrategyallowsindividualsself-interestsmaintainingpositiveself-conceptcheatingAttentionBehavioralethicsEyetrackingUnethicalbehavior

Similar Articles

Cited By