A Dominance Analysis Approach to Determining Predictor Importance in Third, Seventh, and Tenth Grade Reading Comprehension Skills.

Elizabeth Tighe, Christopher Schatschneider
Author Information
  1. Elizabeth Tighe: Florida Center for Reading Research, Florida State University.
  2. Christopher Schatschneider: Florida Center for Reading Research, Florida State University.

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to investigate and rank order by importance the contributions of various cognitive predictors to reading comprehension in third, seventh, and tenth graders. An exploratory factor analysis revealed that for third grade, the best fit was a four-factor solution including Fluency, Verbal Reasoning, Nonverbal Reasoning, and Working Memory factors. For seventh and tenth grade, three-factor solutions with Fluency, Reasoning, and Working Memory factors were the best fit. The three and four-factor models were used in separate dominance analyses for each grade to rank order the factors by predictive importance to reading comprehension. Results indicated that Fluency and Verbal Reasoning were the most important predictors of third grade reading comprehension. For seventh grade, Fluency and Reasoning were the most important predictors. By tenth grade, Reasoning was the most important predictor of reading comprehension. Working Memory was the least predictive of reading comprehension across all grade levels. These results suggest that inferential reasoning skills become an important contributor to reading comprehension at increasing grade levels.

Keywords

References

  1. Child Neuropsychol. 2010;16(4):313-25 [PMID: 20455127]
  2. Read Writ. 2012 Jul;25(6):1345-1364 [PMID: 23926415]
  3. J Learn Disabil. 1994 Feb;27(2):91-103, 122 [PMID: 8195692]
  4. Br J Educ Psychol. 2005 Jun;75(Pt 2):189-201 [PMID: 16033662]
  5. J Exp Child Psychol. 1999 Jun;73(2):139-58 [PMID: 10328862]
  6. Rev Educ Res. 2009 Mar 1;79(1):262-300 [PMID: 20072704]
  7. Psychol Methods. 2003 Jun;8(2):129-48 [PMID: 12924811]
  8. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012 May;141(2):302-20 [PMID: 21875246]
  9. Percept Mot Skills. 1994 Aug;79(1 Pt 1):55-64 [PMID: 7991333]
  10. J Sch Psychol. 2008 Jun;46(3):343-66 [PMID: 19083363]
  11. Psychon Bull Rev. 1996 Dec;3(4):422-33 [PMID: 24213976]
  12. Br J Psychol. 1982 Feb;73(Pt 1):13-20 [PMID: 7059748]
  13. J Exp Child Psychol. 2010 Mar;105(3):213-31 [PMID: 20042196]
  14. J Learn Disabil. 2009 Nov-Dec;42(6):548-75 [PMID: 19745196]
  15. J Learn Disabil. 2003 Sep-Oct;36(5):424-36 [PMID: 15497486]
  16. J Learn Disabil. 1999 Mar-Apr;32(2):120-37 [PMID: 15499713]

Grants

  1. P50 HD052120/NICHD NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0gradeReasoningreadingcomprehensionFluencyWorkingMemoryimportantpredictorsthirdseventhtenthfactorsReadingrankorderimportanceanalysisbestfitfour-factorVerbalpredictivelevelsDominanceComprehensionpurposepresentstudyinvestigatecontributionsvariouscognitivegradersexploratoryfactorrevealedsolutionincludingNonverbalthree-factorsolutionsthreemodelsusedseparatedominanceanalysesResultsindicatedpredictorleastacrossresultssuggestinferentialreasoningskillsbecomecontributorincreasingAnalysisApproachDeterminingPredictorImportanceThirdSeventhTenthGradeSkillsOral

Similar Articles

Cited By