The effect of spinal manipulation on deep experimental muscle pain in healthy volunteers.

Søren O'Neill, Øystein Ødegaard-Olsen, Beate Søvde
Author Information
  1. Søren O'Neill: Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, Odense, 5230 DK Denmark ; Spine Centre of Southern Denmark, Lillebælt Hospital, Østre Hougvej 55, Middelfart, 5500 DK Denmark.
  2. Øystein Ødegaard-Olsen: Spine Centre of Southern Denmark, Lillebælt Hospital, Østre Hougvej 55, Middelfart, 5500 DK Denmark.
  3. Beate Søvde: Stathelle Healthcentre, Brugata 10, Stathelle, 3960 Norway.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High-velocity low-amplitude (HVLA) spinal manipulation is commonly used in the treatment of spinal pain syndromes. The mechanisms by which HVLA-manipulation might reduce spinal pain are not well understood, but often assumed to relate to the reduction of biomechanical dysfunction. It is also possible however, that HVLA-manipulation involves a segmental or generalized inhibitory effect on nociception, irrespective of biomechanical function. In the current study it was investigated whether a local analgesic effect of HVLA-manipulation on deep muscle pain could be detected, in healthy individuals.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: Local, para-spinal muscle pain was induced by injection of 0.5 ml sterile, hyper-tonic saline on two separate occasions 1 week apart. Immediately following the injection, treatment was administered as either a) HVLA-manipulation or b) placebo treatment, in a randomized cross-over design. Both interventions were conducted by an experienced chiropractor with minimum 6 years of clinical experience. Participants and the researcher collecting data were blinded to the treatment allocation. Pain scores following saline injection were measured by computerized visual analogue pain scale (VAS) (0-100 VAS, 1 Hz) and summarized as a) Pain duration, b) Maximum VAS, c) Time to maximum VAS and d) Summarized VAS (area under the curve). Data analysis was performed as two-way analysis of variance with treatment allocation and session number as explanatory variables.
RESULTS: Twenty-nine healthy adults (mean age 24.5 years) participated, 13 women and 16 men. Complete data was available for 28 participants. Analysis of variance revealed no statistically significant difference between active and placebo manipulation on any of the four pain measures.
CONCLUSION: The current findings do not support the theory that HVLA-manipulation has a non-specific, reflex-mediated local or generalized analgesic effect on experimentally induced deep muscle pain. This in turn suggests, that any clinical analgesic effect of HVLA-manipulation is likely related to the amelioration of a pre-existing painful problem, such as reduction of biomechanical dysfunction.

References

  1. Am J Phys Med. 1984 Oct;63(5):217-25 [PMID: 6486245]
  2. Clin J Pain. 2014 Oct;30(10):831-8 [PMID: 24121529]
  3. Phys Ther. 2009 Dec;89(12):1292-303 [PMID: 19797305]
  4. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010 May;40(5):310-7 [PMID: 20436241]
  5. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2007 Oct;30(8):578-83 [PMID: 17996549]
  6. Pain. 2011 May;152(5):1146-55 [PMID: 21396782]
  7. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008 Nov-Dec;31(9):675-81 [PMID: 19028251]
  8. Man Ther. 2006 May;11(2):107-17 [PMID: 15914074]
  9. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2004 Jul-Aug;27(6):381-7 [PMID: 15319760]
  10. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2009 Feb;32(2):101-6 [PMID: 19243721]
  11. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2004 Mar-Apr;27(3):180-5 [PMID: 15129200]
  12. Pain. 1994 Oct;59(1):45-53 [PMID: 7854801]
  13. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2005 Jul-Aug;28(6):381-5 [PMID: 16096036]
  14. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2011 May;34(4):211-20 [PMID: 21621722]
  15. Science. 1965 Nov 19;150(3699):971-9 [PMID: 5320816]
  16. Man Ther. 2001 May;6(2):72-81 [PMID: 11414776]
  17. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1998 Sep;21(7):448-53 [PMID: 9777544]
  18. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008 Jun;31(5):332-7 [PMID: 18558274]
  19. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2005 Sep;28(7):493-501 [PMID: 16182023]
  20. J Pain. 2012 Oct;13(10):936-44 [PMID: 22981090]
  21. Eur J Pain. 2001;5(1):81-7 [PMID: 11394925]
  22. Chiropr Man Therap. 2014 Mar 28;22(1):12 [PMID: 24679336]
  23. Pain. 2003 Nov;106(1-2):159-68 [PMID: 14581123]
  24. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000 May;23(4):258-75 [PMID: 10820299]
  25. Pharmacol Rev. 2012 Jul;64(3):722-79 [PMID: 22722894]
  26. Man Ther. 2010 Feb;15(1):7-12 [PMID: 19643656]
  27. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1990 Jan;13(1):13-6 [PMID: 2324655]
  28. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2012 Oct;22(5):752-67 [PMID: 22296867]
  29. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009 Apr;10(4):283-94 [PMID: 19259101]
  30. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2011 Sep;34(7):432-40 [PMID: 21875517]
  31. J Pain. 2011 Nov;12(11 Suppl):T61-74 [PMID: 22074753]
  32. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006 Aug 15;7:68 [PMID: 16911795]
  33. Pain. 1996 Nov;68(1):69-74 [PMID: 9252000]
  34. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007 Jun;37(6):325-9 [PMID: 17612359]
  35. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2005 Nov-Dec;28(9):662-6 [PMID: 16326235]
  36. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2010 Nov-Dec;33(9):652-8 [PMID: 21109055]
  37. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2010 Oct;6(10):599-606 [PMID: 20664523]
  38. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000 Jun;23(5):324-31 [PMID: 10863252]
  39. J Pain. 2015 May;16(5):454-62 [PMID: 25683899]
  40. Pain. 1994 Sep;58(3):403-11 [PMID: 7838590]
  41. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1994 Jul-Aug;17(6):364-8 [PMID: 7964196]
  42. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2014 Jun;37(5):277-86 [PMID: 24928636]
  43. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2014 Oct;37(8):552-60 [PMID: 25220757]
  44. Chiropr Man Therap. 2012 Aug 10;20(1):26 [PMID: 22883534]
  45. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2004 Oct;27(8):493-502 [PMID: 15510092]
  46. Spine J. 2011 May;11(5):440-6 [PMID: 21463970]
  47. Man Ther. 2010 Apr;15(2):173-8 [PMID: 19945906]
  48. Pain. 2005 Aug;116(3):227-37 [PMID: 15964682]
  49. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006 Jan;29(1):5-13 [PMID: 16396724]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0painHVLA-manipulationtreatmenteffectVASspinalmusclemanipulationbiomechanicalanalgesicdeephealthyinjectionreductiondysfunctiongeneralizedcurrentlocalinduced5saline1followingbplaceboyearsclinicaldataallocationPainanalysisvarianceBACKGROUND:High-velocitylow-amplitudeHVLAcommonlyusedsyndromesmechanismsmightreducewellunderstoodoftenassumedrelatealsopossiblehoweverinvolvessegmentalinhibitorynociceptionirrespectivefunctionstudyinvestigatedwhetherdetectedindividualsMETHODSANDMATERIALS:Localpara-spinal0mlsterilehyper-tonictwoseparateoccasionsweekapartImmediatelyadministeredeitherrandomizedcross-overdesigninterventionsconductedexperiencedchiropractorminimum6experienceParticipantsresearchercollectingblindedscoresmeasuredcomputerizedvisualanaloguescale0-100HzsummarizeddurationMaximumcTimemaximumdSummarizedareacurveDataperformedtwo-waysessionnumberexplanatoryvariablesRESULTS:Twenty-nineadultsmeanage24participated13women16menCompleteavailable28participantsAnalysisrevealedstatisticallysignificantdifferenceactivefourmeasuresCONCLUSION:findingssupporttheorynon-specificreflex-mediatedexperimentallyturnsuggestslikelyrelatedameliorationpre-existingpainfulproblemexperimentalvolunteers

Similar Articles

Cited By