Emergent identity but not symmetry following successive olfactory discrimination training in rats.

Ashley Prichard, Danielle Panoz-Brown, Katherine Bruce, Mark Galizio
Author Information
  1. Ashley Prichard: University of North Carolina Wilmington.
  2. Danielle Panoz-Brown: University of North Carolina Wilmington.
  3. Katherine Bruce: University of North Carolina Wilmington.
  4. Mark Galizio: University of North Carolina Wilmington.

Abstract

The search for symmetry in nonhuman subjects has been successful in recent studies in pigeons (e.g., Urcuioli, 2008). The key to these successes has been the use of successive discrimination procedures and combined training on identity, as well as arbitrary, baseline relations. The present study was an effort to extend the findings and theoretical analysis developed by Urcuioli and his colleagues to Rats using olfactory rather than visual stimuli. Experiment 1 was a systematic replication of Urcuioli's (2008) demonstration of symmetry in pigeons. Rats were exposed to unreinforced symmetry probes following training with two arbitrary and four identity conditional discriminations. Response rates on symmetry probe trials were low and provided little evidence for emergent symmetry in any of the seven Rats tested. In Experiment 2, a separate group of six Rats was trained on four identity relations and was then exposed to probe trials with four novel odor stimuli. Response rates were high on identity probe trials, and low on nonmatching probe trials. The similar patterns of responding on baseline and probe trials that were shown by most Rats provided a demonstration of generalized identity matching. These findings suggest that the development of stimulus control topographies in Rats with olfactory stimuli may differ from those that emerge in pigeons with visual stimuli. Urcuioli's (2008) theory has been highly successful in predicting conditions necessary for stimulus class formation in pigeons, but may not be sufficient to fully understand determinants of emergent behaviors in other nonhuman species.

Keywords

References

  1. J Exp Anal Behav. 2002 Nov;78(3):449-65 [PMID: 12507014]
  2. J Exp Anal Behav. 2005 Sep;84(2):147-65 [PMID: 16262184]
  3. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2006 Jan;32(1):80-6 [PMID: 16435967]
  4. J Exp Anal Behav. 2006 Mar;85(2):203-21 [PMID: 16673826]
  5. J Exp Anal Behav. 1997 Jul;68(1):27-45 [PMID: 16812849]
  6. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2008 Jan;34(1):178-84 [PMID: 18248124]
  7. J Exp Anal Behav. 2008 Nov;90(3):257-82 [PMID: 19070336]
  8. Learn Behav. 2009 May;37(2):188-203 [PMID: 19380896]
  9. J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 Nov;94(3):267-82 [PMID: 21541171]
  10. J Exp Anal Behav. 2011 Sep;96(2):139-54 [PMID: 21909161]
  11. J Exp Anal Behav. 2011 Nov;96(3):329-41 [PMID: 22084494]
  12. J Exp Anal Behav. 2012 Jan;97(1):5-27 [PMID: 22287802]
  13. J Exp Anal Behav. 2012 Nov;98(3):283-93 [PMID: 23144506]
  14. Learn Motiv. 2013 Aug 1;44(3):143-158 [PMID: 23729864]
  15. J Exp Anal Behav. 2014 Jan;101(1):130-51 [PMID: 24170540]
  16. J Exp Anal Behav. 2014 Jan;101(1):152-5 [PMID: 24249646]
  17. J Exp Anal Behav. 2014 Jan;101(1):161-4 [PMID: 24249692]
  18. J Exp Anal Behav. 2014 Jan;101(1):156-60 [PMID: 24249703]
  19. J Exp Anal Behav. 2014 Jan;101(1):10-25 [PMID: 24436073]
  20. Behav Processes. 2015 Mar;112:49-60 [PMID: 25050907]
  21. Anim Cogn. 2015 Jul;18(4):831-7 [PMID: 25690508]
  22. J Exp Anal Behav. 2015 Sep;104(2):119-32 [PMID: 26216645]
  23. J Exp Anal Behav. 2014 Jan;101(1):165-170 [PMID: 28386134]
  24. Conductual. 2015 Apr;3(1):4-25 [PMID: 28386579]
  25. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jan;37(1):23-44 [PMID: 7057127]
  26. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 May;59(3):471-82 [PMID: 8315365]
  27. Physiol Behav. 1993 Apr;53(4):795-804 [PMID: 8511188]

Grants

  1. R15 DA029252/NIDA NIH HHS
  2. DA029252/NIDA NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Animals
Conditioning, Operant
Discrimination Learning
Generalization, Psychological
Male
Odorants
Rats
Rats, Sprague-Dawley
Smell

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0symmetryidentityratsprobetrialspigeonsstimuli2008successivediscriminationtrainingolfactoryfournonhumansuccessfulUrcuioliarbitrarybaselinerelationsfindingsvisualExperimentUrcuioli'sdemonstrationexposedfollowingconditionalResponserateslowprovidedemergentgeneralizedstimulusmaysearchsubjectsrecentstudiesegkeysuccessesuseprocedurescombinedwellpresentstudyeffortextendtheoreticalanalysisdevelopedcolleaguesusingrather1systematicreplicationRatsunreinforcedprobestwodiscriminationslittleevidenceseventested2separategroupsixtrainednovelodorhighnonmatchingsimilarpatternsrespondingshownmatchingsuggestdevelopmentcontroltopographiesdifferemergetheoryhighlypredictingconditionsnecessaryclassformationsufficientfullyunderstanddeterminantsbehaviorsspeciesEmergentnose-pokeolfactometer

Similar Articles

Cited By (6)