Nursing consultations and control of diabetes in general practice: a retrospective observational study.

Trevor Murrells, Jane Ball, Jill Maben, Mark Ashworth, Peter Griffiths
Author Information
  1. Trevor Murrells: National Nursing Research Unit, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, King's College London, London.
  2. Jane Ball: NIHR CLAHRC Wessex, University of Southampton, Southampton.
  3. Jill Maben: National Nursing Research Unit, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, King's College London, London.
  4. Mark Ashworth: Department of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, King's College London, London.
  5. Peter Griffiths: NIHR CLAHRC Wessex, University of Southampton, Southampton.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: diabetes affects around 3.6 million people in the UK. Previous research found that general practices employing more nurses delivered better diabetes care, but did not include data on individual patient characteristics or consultations received.
AIM: To examine whether the proportion of consultations with patients with diabetes provided by nurses in GP practices is associated with control of diabetes measured by levels of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c).
DESIGN AND SETTING: A retrospective observational study using consultation records from 319 649 patients with diabetes from 471 UK general practices from 2002 to 2011.
METHOD: Hierarchical multilevel models to examine associations between proportion of consultations undertaken by nurses and attaining HbA1c targets over time, controlling for case-mix and practice level factors.
RESULTS: The proportion of consultations with nurses has increased by 20% since 2002 but patients with diabetes made fewer consultations per year in 2011 compared with 2002 (11.6 versus 16.0). Glycaemic control has improved and was more uniformly achieved in 2011 than 2002. Practices in which nurses provide a higher proportion of consultations perform no differently to those where nurse input is lower (lowest versus highest nurse contact tertile odds ratio [OR] [confidence interval {95% CI}]: HbA1c ≤53 mmol/mol (7%) 2002, 1.04 [95% CI = 0.87 to 1.25] and 2011, 0.95 [95% CI = 0.87 to 1.03]; HbA1c ≤86 mmol/mol (10%) 2002, 0.97 [95% CI = 0.73 to 1.29] and 2011, 0.95 [95% CI = 0.86 to 1.04]).
CONCLUSION: Practices that primarily use GPs to deliver diabetes care could release significant resources with no adverse effect by switching their services towards nurse-led care.

Keywords

References

  1. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;(2):CD001271 [PMID: 15846614]
  2. Med J Aust. 2006 Jul 3;185(1):10-2 [PMID: 16813539]
  3. J Health Organ Manag. 2006;20(6):525-36 [PMID: 17168104]
  4. JAMA. 2000 Jan 5;283(1):59-68 [PMID: 10632281]
  5. J Nurs Manag. 1999 Sep;7(5):265-70 [PMID: 10786545]
  6. Int J Nurs Stud. 2002 May;39(4):441-51 [PMID: 11909620]
  7. BMJ. 2002 Apr 6;324(7341):819-23 [PMID: 11934775]
  8. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(2):CD003286 [PMID: 12804458]
  9. N Engl J Med. 2004 Sep 30;351(14):1448-54 [PMID: 15459308]
  10. Qual Prim Care. 2008;16(2):73-4 [PMID: 18700082]
  11. BMJ. 2008;337:a1157 [PMID: 18772181]
  12. BMJ. 2008;337:a1169 [PMID: 18772182]
  13. J Adv Nurs. 2009 Mar;65(3):509-15 [PMID: 19222648]
  14. Br J Gen Pract. 2010 Jan;60(570):36-48 [PMID: 20040166]
  15. BMC Fam Pract. 2010;11:1 [PMID: 20051110]
  16. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2011 Apr;16 Suppl 1:42-9 [PMID: 21460349]
  17. Int J Nurs Stud. 2011 Oct;48(10):1199-210 [PMID: 21571273]
  18. Diabet Med. 2012 Jul;29(7):855-62 [PMID: 22537247]
  19. Inform Prim Care. 2011;19(4):251-5 [PMID: 22828580]
  20. Br J Gen Pract. 2015 Jan;65(630):10-1 [PMID: 25548295]

Grants

  1. /Department of Health

MeSH Term

Blood Glucose
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Family Nurse Practitioners
General Practice
Glycated Hemoglobin
Humans
Outcome Assessment, Health Care
Program Evaluation
Referral and Consultation
Retrospective Studies
United Kingdom

Chemicals

Blood Glucose
Glycated Hemoglobin A
hemoglobin A1c protein, human

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0diabetes0consultationsnurses200220111generalcareproportionHbA1c[95%CI=practicespatientscontrol6UKexamineretrospectiveobservationalstudypracticeversusPracticesnursemmol/mol8795healthBACKGROUND:Diabetesaffectsaround3millionpeoplePreviousresearchfoundemployingdeliveredbetterincludedataindividualpatientcharacteristicsreceivedAIM:whetherprovidedGPassociatedmeasuredlevelsglycatedhaemoglobinDESIGNANDSETTING:usingconsultationrecords319649471METHOD:Hierarchicalmultilevelmodelsassociationsundertakenattainingtargetstimecontrollingcase-mixlevelfactorsRESULTS:increased20%sincemadefewerperyearcompared1116Glycaemicimproveduniformlyachievedprovidehigherperformdifferentlyinputlowerlowesthighestcontacttertileoddsratio[OR][confidenceinterval{95%CI}]:≤537%0425]03]≤8610%977329]8604]CONCLUSION:primarilyuseGPsdeliverreleasesignificantresourcesadverseeffectswitchingservicestowardsnurse-ledNursingpractice:mellitusworkforcenursingstaffprimary

Similar Articles

Cited By