Cost-effectiveness of RAS screening before monoclonal antibodies therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer based on FIRE3 Study.

Feng Wen, Yu Yang, Pengfei Zhang, Jian Zhang, Jing Zhou, Ruilei Tang, Hongdou Chen, Hanrui Zheng, Ping Fu, Qiu Li
Author Information
  1. Feng Wen: a Department of Medical Oncology ; Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy; West China Hospital; Sichuan University ; Chengdu , China.
  2. Yu Yang: a Department of Medical Oncology ; Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy; West China Hospital; Sichuan University ; Chengdu , China.
  3. Pengfei Zhang: a Department of Medical Oncology ; Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy; West China Hospital; Sichuan University ; Chengdu , China.
  4. Jian Zhang: a Department of Medical Oncology ; Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy; West China Hospital; Sichuan University ; Chengdu , China.
  5. Jing Zhou: a Department of Medical Oncology ; Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy; West China Hospital; Sichuan University ; Chengdu , China.
  6. Ruilei Tang: a Department of Medical Oncology ; Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy; West China Hospital; Sichuan University ; Chengdu , China.
  7. Hongdou Chen: a Department of Medical Oncology ; Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy; West China Hospital; Sichuan University ; Chengdu , China.
  8. Hanrui Zheng: b West China Biostatistics and Cost-Benefit Analysis Center; Sichuan University ; Chengdu , China.
  9. Ping Fu: b West China Biostatistics and Cost-Benefit Analysis Center; Sichuan University ; Chengdu , China.
  10. Qiu Li: a Department of Medical Oncology ; Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy; West China Hospital; Sichuan University ; Chengdu , China.

Abstract

The surprising results published by FIRE-3 revealed that the overall survival (OS) of RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with Cetuximab(Cmab) and FOLFIRI combination was prolonged to 33.1 months. The substantial increase in testing and treatment costs, however, impose a considerable health burden on patients and society. Hence the study was aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of RAS screening before monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) therapy based on FIRE-3 study. Four groups were analyzed: group 1, patients with KRAS testing treated with Cmab and FOLFIRI; group 2, patients with RAS testing treated with Cmab and FOLFIRI; group 3, patients with KRAS testing treated with bevacizumab(Bmab) and FOLFIRI; group 4, patients with RAS testing treated with Bmab and FOLFIRI. A Markov model comprising 3 health states (progression-free survival, progressive disease and death) was built. The costs were calculated from a Chinese payer perspective, and survival was reported in quality-adjusted life-months (QALMs). Average total lifetime costs ranged from $104,682.44 (RAS-Bmab) to $136,867.44 (RAS-Cmab), while the survival gained varied from 16.88 QALMs in RAS-Bmab to 21.85 QALMs in RAS-Cmab. The cost per QALM was $6,263.86 for RAS-Cmab, $6,145.84 for KRAS-Bmab, $6,201.57 for RAS-Bmab and $6,960.70 for KRAS-Cmab respectively. The KRAS-Cmab strategy was dominated by the other 3 groups. The first-treatment cost of RAS-Cmab was the most influential one to the model. In all, the RAS screening prior to Cmab treatment in mCRC seems to be a cost-effective strategy in the time of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) therapy with the most gained QALMs.

Keywords

References

  1. Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Oct 1;17(19):6338-46 [PMID: 21807639]
  2. Clin Ther. 2010 Mar;32(3):437-53 [PMID: 20399983]
  3. Eur J Cancer. 2002 May;38(7):986-99 [PMID: 11978524]
  4. Lancet Oncol. 2013 Jan;14(1):29-37 [PMID: 23168366]
  5. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Sep;15(10):1065-75 [PMID: 25088940]
  6. N Engl J Med. 2013 Nov 28;369(22):2159-60 [PMID: 24283232]
  7. Health Econ. 2000 Apr;9(3):235-51 [PMID: 10790702]
  8. Eur J Cancer. 2014 Nov;50(16):2791-801 [PMID: 25219451]
  9. Value Health. 2004 Sep-Oct;7(5):518-28 [PMID: 15367247]
  10. Health Econ. 2004 Jan;13(1):21-35 [PMID: 14724891]
  11. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e92147 [PMID: 24691006]
  12. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2014 Feb;14(1):131-8 [PMID: 24397606]
  13. J Med Econ. 2013 Dec;16(12):1387-98 [PMID: 24102083]
  14. Chin J Cancer Res. 2012 Mar;24(1):1-8 [PMID: 23359628]
  15. Clin Ther. 2008 Feb;30(2):382-92 [PMID: 18343276]
  16. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014 Jan-Feb;64(1):9-29 [PMID: 24399786]
  17. Ann Oncol. 2010 May;21 Suppl 5:v93-7 [PMID: 20555112]
  18. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Jul 20;32(21):2240-7 [PMID: 24687833]
  19. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012 Dec 5;104(23):1785-95 [PMID: 23197490]
  20. Eur J Cancer. 2014 Jan;50(1):40-9 [PMID: 24011538]

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
Bevacizumab
Cetuximab
Colorectal Neoplasms
Cost-Benefit Analysis
DNA Mutational Analysis
Disease-Free Survival
Humans
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Metastasis
Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult

Chemicals

KRAS protein, human
Bevacizumab
Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)
Cetuximab

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0RASpatientstreatedFOLFIRItestingsurvivalCmabscreeningmonoclonalantibodiesgroupQALMsRAS-Cmab$6metastaticcolorectalcancercoststherapy3RAS-BmabFIRE-3mCRC1treatmenthealthstudycost-effectivenessmAbsbasedgroupsKRASBmabmodel44gainedcostKRAS-CmabstrategysurprisingresultspublishedrevealedoverallOSwild-typeCetuximabcombinationprolonged33monthssubstantialincreasehoweverimposeconsiderableburdensocietyHenceaimedassessFouranalyzed:2bevacizumab4Markovcomprisingstatesprogression-freeprogressivediseasedeathbuiltcalculatedChinesepayerperspectivereportedquality-adjustedlife-monthsAveragetotallifetimeranged$104682$136867varied16882185perQALM2638614584KRAS-Bmab2015796070respectivelydominatedfirst-treatmentinfluentialonepriorseemscost-effectivetimeCost-effectivenessFIRE3Studychemotherapy

Similar Articles

Cited By