Paramedicine students' perception of preparedness for clinical placement in Australia and New Zealand.

Helen Hickson, Brett Williams, Peter O'Meara
Author Information
  1. Helen Hickson: La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, PO Box 199, Bendigo, VIC, 3552, Australia. h.hickson@latrobe.edu.au.
  2. Brett Williams: Department of Community Emergency Health & Paramedic Practice, Monash University, Frankston, Australia. brett.williams@monash.edu.
  3. Peter O'Meara: La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, PO Box 199, Bendigo, VIC, 3552, Australia. P.OMeara@latrobe.edu.au.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical placement is an essential element of paramedicine education and training as the profession completes the transition from vocational training to a pre-employment, university based model. The objective of this study was to survey pre-employment paramedicine students at Universities in Victoria, Australia and Auckland, New Zealand to measure their self-assessed preparedness for clinical placement.
METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study involving paper-based questionnaires employing a convenience sample of 682 undergraduate paramedicine students (years 1-4) who had completed at least one clinical placement. Student perceptions of preparedness for clinical placement were measured using an adaptation of the 'Preparedness for Hospital Practice' questionnaire.
RESULTS: There are significant differences in students' perception of preparedness for clinical placement, which reflects the differences between universities in relation to structure of their paramedicine programs, the timing of clinical education and the number of hours of clinical placement.
DISCUSSION: There needs to be clinical placement agreements between the ambulance services and universities that clearly describe the standards and expected elements of a quality clinical placement.
CONCLUSIONS: In order to improve the preparedness for placement for paramedicine students, a united approach is required by all stakeholders, including ambulance services, students and universities.

References

  1. Nurse Educ Today. 2015 Nov;35(11):1080-4 [PMID: 26091861]
  2. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2009 Dec;14(5):665-76 [PMID: 19031000]
  3. BMC Med Educ. 2011;11:99 [PMID: 22114989]
  4. Nurse Educ Today. 2012 May;32(4):368-72 [PMID: 21640449]
  5. Nurse Educ Pract. 2013 May;13(3):207-12 [PMID: 23083896]
  6. Med Educ. 2007 Nov;41(11):1089-90 [PMID: 17903193]
  7. Emerg Med Australas. 2013 Apr;25(2):114-9 [PMID: 23560960]
  8. BMC Med Educ. 2009;9:23 [PMID: 19445726]
  9. BMC Res Notes. 2009 Jul 27;2:152 [PMID: 19635136]
  10. J Altern Complement Med. 2010 Jul;16(7):733-43 [PMID: 20590483]
  11. Emerg Med J. 2007 Dec;24(12):854-7 [PMID: 18029524]
  12. Med Educ. 1998 Jan;32(1):19-24 [PMID: 9624395]
  13. Aust Health Rev. 2009 Nov;33(4):533-40 [PMID: 20166901]

MeSH Term

Adult
Age Factors
Allied Health Personnel
Attitude of Health Personnel
Australia
Clinical Competence
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Humans
Male
New Zealand
Sex Factors
Surveys and Questionnaires
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0placementclinicalparamedicinepreparednessstudentsuniversitieseducationtrainingpre-employmentstudyAustraliaNewZealanddifferencesstudents'perceptionambulanceservicesBACKGROUND:ClinicalessentialelementprofessioncompletestransitionvocationaluniversitybasedmodelobjectivesurveyUniversitiesVictoriaAucklandmeasureself-assessedMETHODS:cross-sectionalinvolvingpaper-basedquestionnairesemployingconveniencesample682undergraduateyears1-4completedleastoneStudentperceptionsmeasuredusingadaptation'PreparednessHospitalPractice'questionnaireRESULTS:significantreflectsrelationstructureprogramstimingnumberhoursDISCUSSION:needsagreementsclearlydescribestandardsexpectedelementsqualityCONCLUSIONS:orderimproveunitedapproachrequiredstakeholdersincludingParamedicine

Similar Articles

Cited By