Switching between hands in a serial reaction time task: a comparison between young and old adults.

Maike Hoff, Sabrina Trapp, Elisabeth Kaminski, Bernhard Sehm, Christopher J Steele, Arno Villringer, Patrick Ragert
Author Information
  1. Maike Hoff: Department of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences Leipzig, Germany.
  2. Sabrina Trapp: Department of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences Leipzig, Germany.
  3. Elisabeth Kaminski: Department of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences Leipzig, Germany.
  4. Bernhard Sehm: Department of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences Leipzig, Germany.
  5. Christopher J Steele: Department of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences Leipzig, Germany.
  6. Arno Villringer: Department of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences Leipzig, Germany ; Mind and Brain Institute, Charité and Humboldt University Berlin, Germany.
  7. Patrick Ragert: Department of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences Leipzig, Germany ; Institute for General Kinesiology and Exercise Science, Faculty of Sport Science, University of Leipzig Leipzig, Germany.

Abstract

Healthy aging is associated with a variety of functional and structural brain alterations. These age-related brain alterations have been assumed to negatively impact cognitive and motor performance. Especially important for the execution of everyday activities in older adults (OA) is the ability to perform movements that depend on both hands working together. However, bimanual coordination is typically deteriorated with increasing age. Hence, a deeper understanding of such age-related brain-behavior alterations might offer the opportunity to design future interventional studies in order to delay or even prevent the decline in cognitive and/or motor performance over the lifespan. Here, we examined to what extent the capability to acquire and maintain a novel bimanual motor skill is still preserved in healthy OA as compared to their younger peers (YA). For this purpose, we investigated performance of OA (n = 26) and YA (n = 26) in a bimanual serial reaction time task (B-SRTT), on two experimental sessions, separated by 1 week. We found that even though OA were generally slower in global response times, they showed preserved learning capabilities in the B-SRTT. However, sequence specific learning was more pronounced in YA as compared to OA. Furthermore, we found that switching between hands during B-SRTT learning trials resulted in increased response times (hand switch costs), a phenomenon that was more pronounced in OA. These hand switch costs were reduced in both groups over the time course of learning. More interestingly, there were no group differences in hand switch costs on the second training session. These results provide novel evidence that bimanual motor skill learning is capable of reducing age-related deficits in hand switch costs, a finding that might have important implications to prevent the age-related decline in sensorimotor function.

Keywords

References

  1. Psychol Aging. 1999 Sep;14(3):427-35 [PMID: 10509697]
  2. Front Aging Neurosci. 2014 Mar 10;6:31 [PMID: 24653695]
  3. Cereb Cortex. 2010 Oct;20(10):2368-79 [PMID: 20080932]
  4. Learn Mem. 2007 Jul 10;14(7):480-4 [PMID: 17622650]
  5. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014 Sep;69(9):1139-45 [PMID: 24610868]
  6. Rev Neurosci. 2010;21(3):187-221 [PMID: 20879692]
  7. Neuropsychol Rev. 2009 Dec;19(4):504-22 [PMID: 19876740]
  8. Psychol Rev. 1996 Jul;103(3):403-28 [PMID: 8759042]
  9. J Gerontol. 1994 May;49(3):M133-9 [PMID: 8169335]
  10. Age Ageing. 2006 Jul;35(4):422-7 [PMID: 16690635]
  11. Motor Control. 2002 Jan;6(1):19-31 [PMID: 11842268]
  12. Neuroimage. 2009 Oct 1;47(4):1854-62 [PMID: 19539766]
  13. Psychol Bull. 2011 Sep;137(5):753-84 [PMID: 21463028]
  14. Hum Brain Mapp. 2010 Aug;31(8):1281-95 [PMID: 20082331]
  15. Cereb Cortex. 2012 Nov;22(11):2643-52 [PMID: 22166764]
  16. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2010 Jan;38(1):3-9 [PMID: 20016293]
  17. PLoS Comput Biol. 2010 Mar 12;6(3):e1000708 [PMID: 20300648]
  18. Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Aug;35(8):3945-61 [PMID: 24453170]
  19. Hum Mov Sci. 2008 Oct;27(5):728-37 [PMID: 18513814]
  20. Scand J Psychol. 2001 Jul;42(3):277-86 [PMID: 11501741]
  21. Exp Gerontol. 2014 Sep;57:168-74 [PMID: 24909352]
  22. PLoS One. 2009 Aug 19;4(8):e6683 [PMID: 19690610]
  23. Neuroimage. 2012 Sep;62(3):1750-60 [PMID: 22732557]
  24. Brain Res. 2009 Mar 25;1262:38-47 [PMID: 19368842]
  25. J Neurosci. 2012 Jun 13;32(24):8401-12 [PMID: 22699920]
  26. Phys Ther. 2008 Mar;88(3):351-62 [PMID: 18096651]
  27. Psychol Aging. 1992 Dec;7(4):499-506 [PMID: 1466818]
  28. Neuropsychologia. 1971 Mar;9(1):97-113 [PMID: 5146491]
  29. Neurobiol Aging. 2014 Aug;35(8):1892-900 [PMID: 24680325]
  30. Nat Neurosci. 2003 Mar;6(3):309-15 [PMID: 12548289]
  31. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010 Apr;34(5):721-33 [PMID: 19850077]
  32. Psychol Aging. 2002 Mar;17(1):85-100 [PMID: 11931290]
  33. Neurobiol Aging. 2002 Jan-Feb;23(1):117-23 [PMID: 11755026]
  34. J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Sep;23(9):2171-85 [PMID: 20954936]
  35. Psychol Aging. 1992 Jun;7(2):232-41 [PMID: 1610513]
  36. Age (Dordr). 2013 Oct;35(5):1705-19 [PMID: 23007962]
  37. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003 Oct;24(9):1849-56 [PMID: 14561615]
  38. Cereb Cortex. 2005 Nov;15(11):1676-89 [PMID: 15703252]
  39. Front Aging Neurosci. 2014 Aug 11;6:209 [PMID: 25157232]
  40. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2000 Sep;55(5):P295-303 [PMID: 10985294]
  41. PLoS One. 2013 Apr 29;8(4):e62133 [PMID: 23637982]
  42. Neurobiol Aging. 2012 Oct;33(10):2521-6 [PMID: 22177217]
  43. Neuroimage. 2006 Sep;32(3):1345-54 [PMID: 16798017]
  44. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Oct;120(10):1859-65 [PMID: 19766535]
  45. Phys Ther. 2006 Apr;86(4):478-88 [PMID: 16579665]
  46. Front Aging Neurosci. 2014 Feb 05;6:14 [PMID: 24550829]
  47. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45857 [PMID: 23029279]
  48. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014 Jun;43:1-19 [PMID: 24661987]
  49. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2004 Sep;59(5):P225-32 [PMID: 15358795]
  50. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Apr 25;8:251 [PMID: 24795606]
  51. Front Aging Neurosci. 2015 May 08;7:76 [PMID: 26005417]
  52. Neurobiol Aging. 2003 Nov;24(7):1013-9 [PMID: 12928061]
  53. Brain. 2003 Apr;126(Pt 4):873-88 [PMID: 12615645]
  54. Front Neurol. 2014 Apr 15;5:53 [PMID: 24782824]
  55. Cereb Cortex. 2014 Apr;24(4):1030-6 [PMID: 23242199]
  56. J Neurosci. 2008 Jan 2;28(1):91-9 [PMID: 18171926]
  57. Neuroimage. 2012 Mar;60(1):340-52 [PMID: 22178809]
  58. Brain Struct Funct. 2015 Jan;220(1):273-90 [PMID: 24158531]
  59. Neurobiol Aging. 2007 May;28(5):784-98 [PMID: 16621168]
  60. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Apr 17;7:142 [PMID: 23616757]
  61. Exp Brain Res. 2008 Mar;186(1):59-66 [PMID: 18040671]
  62. J Neurosci. 2014 Oct 1;34(40):13411-21 [PMID: 25274819]
  63. Neuroimage. 2014 Feb 1;86:326-34 [PMID: 24125791]
  64. Neurobiol Aging. 2012 Sep;33(9):1890-9 [PMID: 21813213]
  65. Brain Res Bull. 2006 Oct 16;70(4-6):337-46 [PMID: 17027769]
  66. Exp Aging Res. 2014;40(4):477-511 [PMID: 25054644]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0OAlearningmotorbimanualhandswitchcostsage-relatedtimealterationsperformancehandsskillYAserialreactionB-SRTTagingbraincognitiveimportantadultsHowevermightevenpreventdeclinenovelpreservedcomparedn=26taskfoundresponsetimespronouncedHealthyassociatedvarietyfunctionalstructuralassumednegativelyimpactEspeciallyexecutioneverydayactivitiesolderabilityperformmovementsdependworkingtogethercoordinationtypicallydeterioratedincreasingageHencedeeperunderstandingbrain-behaviorofferopportunitydesignfutureinterventionalstudiesorderdelayand/orlifespanexaminedextentcapabilityacquiremaintainstillhealthyyoungerpeerspurposeinvestigatedtwoexperimentalsessionsseparated1weekthoughgenerallyslowerglobalshowedcapabilitiessequencespecificFurthermoreswitchingtrialsresultedincreasedphenomenonreducedgroupscourseinterestinglygroupdifferencessecondtrainingsessionresultsprovideevidencecapablereducingdeficitsfindingimplicationssensorimotorfunctionSwitchingtask:comparisonyoungold

Similar Articles

Cited By (8)